Contemporary Social Problems and Integrative Solutions Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Contemporary Social Problems and Integrative Solutions Essay
This assignment will demonstrate your ability to break down assumptions and values of at least two disciplinary arguments surrounding a problem. You should be able to recognize disciplinary approaches as well as perceptions of the processes as they are interpreted by you and your group mates.
Use the skills you learned in the lessons related to ethical consciousness and perspective taking to help you account for the process of identifying disciplinary and value laden perspectives on the problem.
In the exercise you will map the complexity of perspectives on the problem. You will align perspectives with at least two disciplinary approaches to research the problem and other factors that build perceptions of the problem.
You will describe how the integration of perspectives is possible through the identification of common and aligned perspectives represented by the disciplines in your Annotated Bibliography and Peer Review assignments.
Criteria for Success
This is it! This assignment is the culmination of all lessons and assignments of the course. It is the assignment that will demonstrate your mastery of the skills and values of interdisciplinarity. You should review the progress you have made related to the understanding and use of our core skills: Perspective taking, appreciation for diversity, intellectual dexterity, and critical thinking. Also be ready to unpack ALL of your cognitive tool kit. Skills such as ethical consciousness and metacognition will be called upon. Know what these skills are and articulate how you used them.
Use your skills for collaboration and appreciation for diversity to heighten your creativity. The diversity of perspectives can be found in the annotated bibliographies in the group site. The explanations in the annotations and your peer review will explain the various perspectives from the disciplines as well as the perspectives of your group mates. Use these as much as possible.
Reference the Annotated Bibliography discussion board. Use the annotated bibliographies and your peer review to support your work. You will reference the information on the group page, but the completion of this map is done individually. All of the following instructions will be done individually and turned in individually through the assignment portal.
- Use Critical Thinking to describe the strengths and limitations of each disciplinary approach to the problem. (30 points)
- What is each discipline’s contribution to understanding the problem?
- What has each discipline missed?
- How does a purely disciplinary approach to the problem limit a holistic understanding of the problem? Be specific.
- Map of Interdisciplinary Connections: (30 points)
- Map the disciplinary variables and interests related to the problem. (review lectures on mapping in the course site) A sample map is available via Canvas in this module.
- You must show at least 2 disciplinary connections to the problem in your map.
- You may include variables or issues, interests, etc. that are not aligned with a discipline. (What each discipline has missed). Indicate those clearly in the map through a distinct line style.
Formatting your map
- Formatting for the map can be done in MS Word, PowerPoint, or even drawn by hand.
- An image of the map can be uploaded separately as a jpeg or gif file. It can also be inserted into your paper.
- You may use colors or line styles to indicate disciplinary attachments to variables, issues, etc. For example, instead of colored lines representing disciplinary perspectives, you can use solid and dashed lines to differentiate one discipline from another.
- If there are variables, issues, etc., that are important but not attached to a disciplinary perspective please include them. Use a third color or line style to indicate connections that are not included in a disciplinary perspective.
- If you experience problems formatting the map you should let us know. But plan ahead. If your assignment is not turned in on time it will be considered late. If this assignment is not complete because of the image file, a deduction of 20 points will be applied.
- Integrative Solutions (40 points)
- Explain where common ground exists and how a balance of perspectives is possible. Be descriptive. For example, you may find that many points on the map are common. You should write about the fact that many are common, pull out 2 to 3 important examples of common points of interest, variables followed in the research, etc and describe how the disciplines use them in similar ways. (30/40 points)
- Explore ways in which the common ground could present opportunities for solutions to the problem. (10/40 points)
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.