Teaching Conformity Leads to Violence Essay

Teaching Conformity Leads to Violence Essay

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Teaching Conformity Leads to Violence Essay

Teaching, Conformity, Leads, Violence, Essay

School shootings have been a widely debated and ongoing topic over the last decades. From the Stockton Schoolyard shooting in January of 1989, to more recently the Douglas High School shooting in February of 2018, school shootings are still a prevalent problem.

To help stop and prevent these shootings in the future, it is crucial to look deeply into the shooter’s past to understand what could trigger this brutal violence. Fortunately, we have the tools and resources to comprehend the minds of some of these shooters, such as Erich Harris from the Columbine High School shooting of 1999, along with scientific evidence that could be helpful in preventing these shootings in the future.

A common theme seen is the unmeaningful education these students are receiving and therefore resorting them to violent acts. This leads to deeper questions about our educational system and if we are really teaching students how to be critical and impactful thinkers for our world.

Are the strict and conformed atmospheres of teaching prohibiting students from developing thoughts and ideas apart from what they are being taught? Is the system taking away their individuality and shaping them into people we are expected to be? This, among other motives, was one of the main arguments Eric Harris reiterated which ultimately led him to make the decision to shoot up Columbine High School in April of 1999.

He was convinced the schooling system was rigged into making everyone the same which took away their individuality and uniqueness. Although it was later confirmed that he had psychological issues, he does bring up similar points to Staples’s research article Violence in Schools. Staples also argues the point that children need to be able to express their individuality, which schools have been taking away from their students.

Lastly, the most viewed Ted Talk to date by Sir Ken Robinson titled “Do Schools Kill Creativity?” claims that from when children set foot in the schooling system, all they are taught to do is not to make mistakes and that mistakes are possibly the worst thing you can do, therefore leading them in a direction only not to make mistakes and not question the status quo.

In Eric Harris’s journal entries, he is very convinced about the idea that schools take away student’s individuality and brainwash them to all believe and be taught the same things. He writes passionately that school is “…society’s way of turning all the young people into good little robots and factory workers. That’s why we sit in desks in rows and go by bell schedules, to get prepared for the real world cause ‘that’s what its like’” (Harris 2).

He then goes on to talk more broadly about life in general and how this schooling affects all of humanity in the future, “Human nature is smothered out by society, job, and work and school. Instincts are deleted by laws. I see people say things that contradict themselves, or people that don’t take any advantage to the gift of human life” (Harris 3). Despite his imminent anger towards the world, he does provide important insight into why he ultimately made the decision to shoot up Columbine.

Although Harris did suffer from psychological disorders, his claims are backed up with reasoning and research from political scientist Staples. In his article, Violence in Schools, he argues that our “broken world” is due to the lack of engagement of people in meaningful ways and our consumerism mentality. Staples writes that “Greed, boredom, and distraction as elements of a broken world lead the individual to seek escape from the immediacy of the fundamental

yearning for significance in a crazed dialectic that never resolves itself” (Staples 33). Each stage of our “broken world” then leads from one to the other in a chain reaction. “Greed sated leads to boredom, which seeks to escape through distraction or a return to greed” (Staples 33). Ultimately, because of this, we are consumed by these qualities rather than engaging with the world in a meaningful, and productive way.

We have lost our “…fundamental yearning for significance through engagement in the processes of reflection, creativity, compassion, and the gift of self to others” (Staples 33). The lack of all these significant attributes one should embody leads us to desolation and unfulfillment. In response to this problem, Staples writes, “Violence is often merely a response to the emptiness in which they find themselves” (Staples 34).

To understand the root of this problem, Staples looks at institutionalized schooling in America. He says that schooling has “…become a routinized process, lacking sustained meaningfulness. It is experienced by many students as a boring, fearful series of daily rituals that have to be endured as a means to some future end, one not even decided by the students themselves” (Staples 36).

In response to this, it makes sense that students then feel powerless in their education and feel like they have no control over where their lives take them. They feel trapped. This creates anger and frustration, as seen in Eric Harris’ journal entries. Staples argues that “…violence in our schools exists in increasing proportions because the fundamental yearning for significance has been thwarted or perverted by the cultural milieu in which we live” (Staples 31). This lack of personalization alienates students from a world of significance and discovery, where we need future generations to be inspired to investigate and learn more about.

The most viewed TedTalk to date speaks on the topic “Do Schools Kill Creativity?” by Sir Ken Robinson with over 64 million views. He starts his talk by giving examples of children and how most children will take a chance and not be afraid to be wrong because they have not yet learned the consequences of being wrong. When these children reach adulthood, they lose this capacity. Robinson says, “They have become frightened of being wrong.

And we run our companies like this. We stigmatize mistakes. And we’re now running national education systems where mistakes are the worst thing you can make. And the result is that we are educating people out of their creative capacities” (Robinson 5:14). This fear of being wrong has shown us only to do what is taught in classes or workspaces as right. As spoken about before, this conformity and lack of meaningful engagement cause students to lose their individuality and make them feel like they have no purpose.

Another insightful example Robinson gives quotes Picasso. He says, “Picasso once said this, he said that all children are born artists. The problem is to remain an artist as we grow up. I believe this passionately, that we don’t grow into creativity, we grow out of it. Or rather, we get educated out of it” (Robinson 5:57).

This is an interesting perspective to think that schools are actually educating students out of their own creativity that they innately have. It is then our job to make sure this does not happen for future generations. The reason this Ted Talk has so many views is that schools have the intention to give the best education to children, but in that process, they are also taking away important qualities that cannot be taught and must be nourished.

In conclusion, the main factor for violence in school is the feeling that students feel like they have lost their sense of individuality and have fallen into conformity with school policies. This is seen not only in school but in workspaces and large institutions as well. The only way to reverse this normality is to start accepting failures as a part of life and growth. We need to stop punishing those who do not conform to institutional norms and start using their individuality as a tool for growth and discovery.

Work Cited:

Harris’ journal: Langman, Peter. October 2014. Version 1.3.

Staples

Robinson, Ken. “Transcript of ‘Do Schools Kill Creativity?”.” TED, Feb. 2006, www.ted.com/talks/sir_ken_robinson_do_schools_kill_creativity/transcript.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.