BTF5000 Current Issues in Corporate Governance and Regulation Essay

BTF5000 Current Issues in Corporate Governance and Regulation Essay

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

BTF5000 Current Issues in Corporate Governance and Regulation Essay

BTF5000, Current, Issues, Corporate, Governance, Regulation, Essay

 

Reaction Paper Due Date: Wednesday 3rd June 2020 11:59PM ONLINE SUBMISSION This assignment is to be submitted online via Moodle in .pdf format.

The instructions for online submission by Moodle are set out at http://guides.lib.monash.edu/moodle/assignments Assignments are not to be placed in staff mail boxes under any circumstances TASK

The reaction paper involves submission of a written paper of a maximum of 800 words (excluding footnotes) on a scholarly article. By 10 April 2020, each student should have selected a scholarly article among those set out at the end of this assignment on which the student will write a reaction paper.

The final version of the reaction paper must be submitted via Moodle by 3 June 2020. Students must retain a copy of their marked reaction paper until the release of final results for this unit.

The reaction paper DOES need to:

• do more than simply describe an existing problem or legal issue;
• adequately cover the subject. Topic selection is critical here—you want a topic that you can adequately discuss in a short paper length;
• answer questions such as:

o (i) why do the issues dealt with in the scholarly article on

which you write the reaction paper matter, o (ii) whether the selected article refers to a specific

jurisdiction or specific jurisdictions and what this jurisdiction or these jurisdictions is/are;

o (iii) whether the selected scholarly article refers to the current law (in other words: has the law changed?)—if the law has changed, briefly explain what approach you want to adopt in your reaction paper with respect to the occurred changes in the law,

o (iv) what are the most relevant contributions in the literature on the topic,

o (vi) what is your opinion on the arguments proposed in the scholarly article you write a reaction paper on,

o (vii) what arguments is your opinion based on.

HINT: Concrete examples can do wonders;

• be written in an organized, clear and succinct fashion. The more active and interesting the writing, the better!

The final reaction paper must contain a reference list. You are required to reference scholarly journals and books. Your work must contain footnotes (NOT endnotes). You are required to adopt the referencing style APA 6th (please visit: https://guides.lib.monash.edu/citing-referencing/apa).

You must include a reference list at the end of the reaction paper. Organise your reference list alphabetically. The reference list must include all scholarly journals and books you consult when preparing your work. It is expected that reaction papers will contain a brief review of the literature on the topic.

The words and ideas found in the literature must be properly referenced in both footnotes and the reference list. Ideas that are paraphrased from the literature must be properly referenced in both footnotes and the reference list. Students must ensure to avoid plagiarism when writing their reaction papers. Plagiarism is the unattributed use of another’s thoughts or words.

When in doubt, CITE IT! I would much prefer to receive an overcautious paper with too many citations than one with too few. Submission and Cover Sheet You must submit the reaction paper through the unit Moodle site. You also must submit a completed cover sheet through the unit Moodle site.

You can find an Assignment Cover Sheet on the unit Moodle site. The cover sheet contains a warning regarding plagiarism. Assessment Criteria The following matters are taken into account in grading. The more effectively you perform on each task, the better the overall grade:

• understanding of the relevant matters; • logical structure; • clarity of expression; • soundness of the arguments; • identification and synthesis of main issues; • succinctness; • evidence of good research.

Length The maximum length of your reaction paper should be 800 words (excluding footnotes). The words in the reference list do not count. Referencing Style You are required to adopt the referencing style APA 6th (please visit: https://guides.lib.monash.edu/citing-referencing/apa).

Penalty for late submission For any late submissions of the reaction paper, a penalty of 10% of the maximum value of the assessment task applies for each day or part days (including any weekend days and/or public holidays).

Special Considerations For Special consideration applications, please see https://www.monash.edu/exams/changes/special- consideration%23tabs__541603. Assessment Task Contribution The reaction paper counts for 40% of the total marks for the subject. Plagiarism & Collusion A warning regarding plagiarism and collusion is set out on the assignment cover sheet. Please read this carefully.

SCHOLARLY ARTICLES FOR YOUR SELECTION Select the scholarly article on which you write your reaction paper among the following articles and communicate your selection by 10 April 2020.

Separation of Ownership and Control

John C. Coffee Jr., The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control, 111 Yale L. J. 1 (2001) Margaret M. Blair & Lynn A. Stout, A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law, 85 VA. L. REV. 247 (1999) Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci, Archeology, Language, and Nature of Business Corporations, 89 Miss. L.J. 43

Agency Costs

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. Claire A. Hill and Brett H. McDonnell, The Agency Cost Paradigm: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, 38 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 561 (2015) Hideki Kanda, Debtholders and Equityholders, 21 Journal of Legal Studies 431

Shareholders

1. Gordon Smith, The Shareholder Primacy Norm, 23 J. CORP. L. 277 (1998).

Lucian A. Bebchuk, The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise, 93 Va. L. Rev. 675 (2007)

Lynn A. Stout, Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy, 75 S. CAL. L. REV. 118

Stakeholders

Margaret M. Blair & Lynn A. Stout, A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law, 85 VA. L. REV. 247 (1999) Martin Gelter, The Dark Side of Shareholder Influence: Managerial Autonomy and Stakeholder Orientation in Comparative Corporate Governance, 50 HARV. INT’L L. J. 129-194. Margaret Blair, Locking in Capital: What Corporate Law Achieved for Business Organizers in the Nineteenth Century, 51 UCLA Law Review 387 (2003)

Firm-Specific Investments

Elizabeth Pollman, Team Production Theory and Private Company Boards, 38 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 619 (2015). Margaret M. Blair & Lynn A. Stout, A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law, 85 VA. L. REV. 247 (1999)

Jonathan R. Macey, Externalities, Firm-Specific Capital Investments, and the Legal Treatment of Fundamental Corporate Changes, 1989 Duke Law Journal 173-201 (1989)

Directors

Margaret M. Blair, Boards of Directors as Mediating Hierarchs, 38 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 297 (2015). Einer Elhauge, Sacrificing Corporate Profits in the Public Interest, 80 N.Y.U.L. REV. 733 Stephen M. Bainbridge, Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance, 97 Nw. U. L. Rev. 547

Related-Party Transactions

Vladimir Atanasov, Bernard Black, and Conrad Ciccotello, Law and Tunneling, 37 Journal of Corporation Law 1 Luca Enriques, Related Party Transactions: Policy Options and Real-World Challenges (with a Crtitique of the European Commission Proposal), 16 European Business Organization Law Review 1 Zohar Goshen, The Efficiency of Controlling Corporate Self-Dealing: Theory Meets Reality, 91 California Law Review 393

Conflicts of Interests

James D. Cox, Managing and Monitoring Conflicts of Interest: Empowering the Outside Directors with Independent Counsel, 48 Vill. L. Rev. 1077 (2003)

Zohar Goshen, The Efficiency of Controlling Corporate Self-Dealing: Theory Meets Reality, 91 California Law Review 393 Klaus J. Hopt, Conflict of Interest Secrecy and Insider Information of Directors—A Comparative Analysis, 10 European Company Law and Financial Law Review 167

Corporate Entities and Fundamental Changes

Jonathan R. Macey, Externalities, Firm-Specific Capital Investments, and the Legal Treatment of Fundamental Corporate Changes, 1989 Duke Law Journal 173-201 (1989) Paul G. Mahoney and Mark Weinstein, The Appraisal Remedy and Merger Premiums, 1 American Law and Economics Review 239 Robert B. Thompson, Squeeze-out Mergers and the “New” Appraisal Remedy, 62 Washington University Law Quarterly 415

Controlling Shareholders

Ronald J. Gilson, Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Governance: Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy, 119 Harvard Law Review 1641

Marcel Kahan, Sales of Corporate Control, 9 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 368 Ronald J. Gilson and Jeffrey N. Gordon, Controlling Controlling Shareholders, 152 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 785

Securities Markets

Joel Seligman, The Historical Need for a Mandatory Corporate Disclosure System, 9 Journal of Corporation Law 1 Edward B. Rock, Securities Regulation as Lobsters Trap: A Credible Commitment Theory of Mandatory Disclosure, 23 Cardozo Law Review 675 Frank H. Easterbrook and Daniel R. Fischel, Mandatory Disclosure and the Protection of Investors, 70 Virginia Law Review 669

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.