Tall grass Gothic by Melanie Marnich Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Tall grass Gothic by Melanie Marnich Essay
Play Critique/Production Essay Guidelines
The following are the plays and the guidelines for your play critique.
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO WRITE ONE RESPONSE PAPER FOR ONE OF THE TWO PRODUCTION OF YOUR CHOOSING.
YOU WILL TURN IN YOUR TICKET FOR YOUR SECOND PRODUCTION.
YOUR TICKET IS THE ONLY THING REQUIRED BY YOU FOR YOUR SECOND PRODUCTION AND IT MUST BE TURNED IN BY THE DUE DATE . NO WRITTEN PAPER IS REQUIRED FOR THE SECOND PRODUCTION.
PRODUCTION RESPONSE #1 WRITTEN REACTION = 50PTS
PRODUCTION RESPONSE #2 TICKET ONLY = 50PTS
The Two Gentlemen Of Verona
By William Shakespeare • Directed by Mark Ramont
February 24-March 11, 2017 February 24, 25, March 2-4, 9-11 at 8 pm February 26, March 4, 5, 11, 12 at 2 pm Young Theatre
( Tallgrass Gothic )
By Melanie Marnich • Directed by James R. Taulli
March 10-April 9, 2017 March 10, 11, 16-18, 23-25, April 6, 7, 8 at 8 pm March 12, 18, 19, 25, 26, April 8, 9 at 2 pm Hallberg Theatre
Andrew Lippa’s Wild Party
Book, Music & Lyrics by Andrew Lippa Based on the poem by Joseph Moncure March Directed by Patrick Pearson Musical Direction by Mitchell Hanlon Choreography by William F. Lett
April 21-May 7, 2017 April 21, 22, 27-29, May 3-6 at 8 pm April 23, 29, 30, May 6, 7 at 2 pm Young Theatre
In the paper you need to cover ALL the following areas: acting, directing, design (set,
light, costume, sound, hair and makeup). With all of these areas, talk about what you found was
effective and ineffective. Who stood out to you and why? What was effective or ineffective
about them? What about the show was a whole? What was the message of the show? What
themes did you find in the show? THIS IS NOT A PLOT SUMMARY. I do not need or want
you to just talk about the plot or give me a play-by-play of the show. I saw the show as well.
You can touch on the plot, but I am much more interested in your opinion of the show (and all its
various aspects). Also, you cannot just refer to someone by their character name or their
title (director, designer, etc.). You are expected to give credit to the actor, director or
designer by using their name, which must be spelled correctly (or at least how it was
spelled in the program). You will LOSE POINTS if you do not do so. You will also lose
points if you do not talk about the acting, the design AND the direction!!
PLEASE BE AWARE – The designers are listed at the TOP of the program, and
will say something like “Light Designer … Matt Schleicher”, etc. Do NOT list the Design
Advisor or Crew Members. These people did NOT design the show, and you will have
points deducted from your paper for incorrectly listing this information.
In your paper, don’t forget YOUR reaction and to the performance itself. THIS IS
THE MOST IMPORTANT PART! How do you react to this play? How does the message
of the play affect you individually? Discuss directorial choices, design choices, acting choices
… anything that you had a reaction to. Be as specific as you can be, and use specific examples
from the performance to illustrate your point. You don’t have to love the play or even like it, but
you need to be able to support your arguments. So just saying “I loved this play” or “I hated it”
or “it was all right” won’t cut it – tell me WHY you are having the reactions you are having.
Each paper will be 700-1200 words long, MAXIMUM of 1200 words. This paper is not
a just plot summary or a book report. Plot is very important, but it is only one of the many
areas you need to discuss. I want to hear YOUR reactions to this performance.
If you do not give credit to the designers by name, you will automatically have TEN
POINTS deducted from your grade. Mentioning only some of the designers but not all when
then incur a partial deduction. If you do not give credit to the director by name, you will
automatically have EIGHT POINTS deducted from your grade. If you do not give credit to the
actors by name, you will automatically have FIFTEEN POINTS deducted from your grade.
NOTE: This does NOT MEAN that you have to talk about EVERY SINGLE ACTOR in the show. Some of the shows have 30 actors – you do not need to talk about them all.
Each critique will be worth 50 points. NO late papers will be accepted.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tall grass Gothic by Melanie Marnich Essay
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.