Angry Adolescence Case Analysis Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Angry Adolescence Case Analysis Paper
Angry, Adolescence, Case, Analysis, Paper
The case study selected for the discussion included an adolescent female who appears to be extremely upset. The first video presented the client exhibiting extreme anger. The client as observed in the first video, appeared to be highly disrespectful towards the therapist and refuses to discuss anything.
The client was also observed to have misbehaved with the therapist. In the second video, it was observed that the therapist succeeded to initiate a productive discussion with the client, which revealed significant points regarding the personality of the client.
The client was identified to be a popular girl at her school; however, she reported having anger-related issues. The client’s behavior indicated that she is most likely to be suffering from oppositional defiant disorder (ODD).
The ODD is a form of disruptive behavior disorder in which the client experiences irritable or angry mood, vindictiveness, and disobedient behavior (Cavanagh, et al., 2017). Clients experiencing ODD finds it difficult to keep their anger under control and exhibits a rebellious and noncompliant behavior (Cavanagh, et al., 2017).
The DSM-5 criteria for the diagnosis of ODD require that the client experience a pattern of irritable mood or anger, aggressive or rebellious behavior, or vindictiveness for a minimum duration of six months (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). According to the American Psychiatric Association (2013), the DSM-5 criteria for ODD requires that the client must exhibit a minimum of four of the following symptoms:
- Frequent loss of temper
- Frequent anger and resentment
- Frequently irritable or get annoyed easily
- Frequent arguments with authoritative figures
- Frequent denial to follow orders
- Frequently upsets others
- Frequently place blame on others for own mistakes
- Remains mean or spiteful
Because the patient exhibited anger towards the therapist and behaved disrespectfully, it is suggested that the client is experiencing ODD. The client exhibited no fear of the consequences of her actions for being noncompliant.
The preferred therapeutic approach to be used with the client is child-based therapy and parent training. This is the preferred psychotherapies for the clients diagnosed with ODD (Katzmann, et al, 2018).
Child-based therapy focuses on problem-solving whereas parent training supports parents to develop skills required for the management of troublesome behavior of their child (Goertz-Dorten, et al., 2019). This is accomplished by applying the technique of limiting involuntary positive reinforcement of troublesome behavior (Goertz-Dorten, et al., 2019).
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is identified to be effective psychotherapy for clients with ODD (Katzmann, et al, 2018). Therefore, the client would be referred to CBT and parent training would be referred for the parents.
Psychotropic medications appropriate for the treatment of ODD are second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) (Arnold & Moody, 2018). Risperdal is the brand name of risperidone, which is considered the preferred psychopharmacological agent for the treatment of ODD because of its proven efficacy for adolescents (Arnold & Moody, 2018). Therefore, the appropriate psychotropic medication for the client would be Risperdal.
The expected outcome for the client based on selected therapeutic approaches will be that parents will be able to have a better understanding of their child’s behavior. The parents would gain the ability to manage the disruptive behavior of their child.
It would also be expected that the client would be able to have a better understanding of herself, her thoughts, behavior, and pertinent actions. It is expected that the client would experience a decline in ODD symptoms and become capable of managing her disruptive behavior.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: Author.
Arnold, M. J., & Moody, A. L. (2018). Atypical Antipsychotics for Disruptive Behavior Disorders in Children and Adolescents. American Family Physician, 97(11), 5-6. Retrieved from https://www.aafp.org/afp/2018/0601/p715.html
Cavanagh, M., Quinn, D., Duncan, D., Graham, T., & Balbuena, L. (2017). Oppositional defiant disorder is better conceptualized as a disorder of emotional regulation. Journal of Attention Disorders, 21(5), 1-9. doi:10.1177/1087054713520221
Goertz-Dorten, A., Benesch, C., Berk-Pawlitzek, E., Faber, M., Hautmann, C., Hellmich, M., & Doepfner, M. (2019). Efficacy of individualized social competence training for children with oppositional defiant disorders/conduct disorders: A randomized controlled trial with an active control group. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(2), 65-65. doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1144-x
Katzmann, J., Döpfner, M., & Görtz-Dorten, A. (2018). Child-based treatment of oppositional defiant disorder: Mediating effects on parental depression, anxiety and stress. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(9), 81-92. doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1181-5
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Angry Adolescence Case Analysis Paper
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.