Stakeholder Relationships and Alliance Discussion Essay Paper

Stakeholder Relationships and Alliance Discussion Essay Paper

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Stakeholder Relationships and Alliance Discussion Essay Paper

Each reply must be at least 300 words. For

each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 2 scholarly or

biblical resources in current AMA format. Each reply must incorporate at least

1 scholarly or biblical resource as well.

 

First reply:

Hayley Hudson

Section 7 & 8

COLLAPSE

Section Seven

STAKEHOLDER RELATIONSHIPS AND ALLIANCES

All key stakeholders for the Lewisville Community Health Coalition have been clearly identified. All individuals, organizations and entities that contribute to the mission and continuation of the program are regarded as key stakeholders. In the future, the stake holders will continue to grow as the program reaches more and more youth, families, schools and communities. Other stakeholders will remain constant such as facilitators, medical personnel, education personnel and donors/ sponsors/volunteers for the program. The expectations and requirements of all members are provided in a definition of role presentation. The main focus of each player is to build the relationships that are essential to keep the program in play. Stakeholders are expected to report any anomalies to designated personnel as to allow the proper implementation of changes. All stakeholders will complete surveys for satisfaction overall. Al policy changes will be distributed accordingly to ensure changes are kept at the forefront of the organization. As the community is a core stakeholder for the program, it will be imperative for the organization to run itself as a fluid community keeping the relationships between stakeholders transparent and unstrained. Stakeholders will be consulted before any changes are implemented, especially in an area that will affect them significantly.

Section Eight

RISK FACTORS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Risk Management

The risks that will face the organization will be combatted with pre-planning and solid effort to ensure their effects are minimal. Compliance with parents’ wishes will be essential as not to violate the student relations and consent. The goal is to promote health and reduce liability for the organization from a health standpoint. A part of risk management is also to minimize potential loss of sponsors, donors and investors. Maintaining communication between stakeholders is key in regulatory compliance.

Regulatory Compliance

The board of directors will be in charge of ensuring regulatory compliance throughout the program. There will be regulation on operational compliance, financial compliance, personnel compliance and security compliance. As the program deals with the well-being of minors, security is of the utmost importance. HIPPA compliance is also important and extends to all relations held with medical personnel on staff.

Corporate Governance

The board of directors will meet monthly to discuss and remedy any ethical issues or short comings befalling the organization with cause for further damage. Any changes decided upon will be done so with majority vote and will be implemented immediately. These updates shall be disseminated throughout the ranks of the organization accordingly.

Taxation

Maintenance of tax exempt status is a priority for the organization. Any potential loss of this status will be prioritized and eliminated before the status is changed.

Health and Safety

All employees will be CPR and First Aid trained. There will always be a designated emergency personnel member present at school sites. Maintaining health and safety standards set forth by school grounds is mandatory.

HIPPA and other privacy issues

All HIPPA guidelines and regulations will be followed without deviation.

Second reply:

Stephanie Rosson

Section7&8

COLLAPSE

Section Seven

STAKEHOLDER RELATIONSHIPS AND ALLIANCES

A stakeholder is considered one who has control of the non-profit because he or she is in position to exercise influence over the organization’s conduct¹. Paws for a Cure is in the process stage of developing more key stakeholders. Currently, Paws for a Cure internal stakeholders include, board of directors, volunteers, and staff. PAWS for a Cure is in the developing stage of obtaining external stakeholders. External stakeholders will play a big part in this organization. Paws for a Cure would like to develop key relationships and partnerships with local organizations to build awareness in the community. Stakeholders will be chosen based on experience and skills. Paws for a Cure wants stakeholders able to make this non-profit organization a success. Additionally, Paws for a Cure expects stakeholders to present ideas to the board and generate additional support for this organization. Paws for a Cure is expected to obtain external stakeholders such as, funders, faith-based organizations, local business alliance, government officials, and advocacy organizations for veterans and active service members.

Strengths would include: An experienced board of directors, staff, and volunteer system. Paws for a Cure has developed a strong relationship with local mental health professionals, psychiatric doctors, and the Department of Veterans Affairs in Salem, Virginia.

Weaknesses include: Lack of external stakeholders. An inability to develop relationships with local government officials, and local non-profit organizations in the community to raise awareness and have others become involved and engaged.

Paws for a Cure is focused on developing a quarterly meeting with stakeholders to provide a financial and meta-analysis report on the organization. Growth and success will be based upon the number of individuals served each month and the demand for the service. Policy changes and legal matters will be discussed and approved by stakeholders. Stakeholders will bridge the gap of the organization’s weaknesses. Paws for a Cure will advocate and develop relationships through organized non-profit local meetings and board members will initiate lunch meetings to develop external stakeholders for the organization.

Stakeholders will be expected to uphold the mission of Paws for a Cure. Therefore, stakeholders will be expected to provide a reality check and have transparency with Paws for a Cure. This will help relationships amongst each other in the company to grow and flourish. Lastly, stakeholders will be brief on each matter that poses a concern or threat to this organization

Section Eight

RISK FACTORS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Risk Management

Several risk factors are involved in this organization. Service members and veterans are faced with physical, emotional, and mental changes caused by war and situations experienced in the military. The current uneven access to appropriate mental health services that returning U.S. veterans encounter echoes the disparities in access to quality mental health services for the general population². This causes damages to personal relationships of service members and veterans. This is why this organization is an essential part in this community. Paws for a Cure has a team equipped to handle different mental health conditions. This enables our staff to work closely with clients to ensure the proper care is taken care of and their need is heard. Staff at Paws for a Cure is confident in our service dogs to know the needs of each client will be met and their daily lives will be impacted.

The priority for this organization is to alleviate the daily struggles each client may face. This is considered to be high priority when handling a client’s need. Business and financial priorities are next. Lastly, community priorities will be handled on a coordinated basis through a volunteer committee. Paws for a Cure would like to develop a routine that works for each client by the end of the first month. This will help the organization establish the weaknesses, gaps, and successes. By the end of the year, the organization would like to see the demand for this service to increase by 75%. The achievement of this goal would lead the organization to hire more staff and rely on stakeholders to keep relationships in the community fluid.

Risks to Paws for a Cure:

Financial hardship

Loss risk

Demand risk

Awareness risk

Retaining staff

Funding sources

Interest

Regulatory Compliance

Corporate This will be handled by the board of directors to ensure all tasks are handed out to the appropriate stakeholder. This will help guarantee operations can be run smoothly.

Taxation; Tax exemption status will be maintained to ensure the loss of this is not at risk.

Superannuation; This will be made available to all staff members.

Employing staff; Recruitment and hiring staff will be the responsibility of head staff members.

Health and safety; Health and Safety of the organization will be the responsibility of board members to ensure health and safety code are followed. Quarterly safety meetings will be held and staff members will be briefed if any changes occur before then.

Trade practices; This will be developed and handled by stakeholders and the executive director. Tasks may be delegated else where if needed or if experience is not there. Experienced partners with the organization may be asked to become involved.

Intellectual property rights and HIPAA and other privacy issues; This will be handled by the organization’s lawyers. Staff members, and stakeholders will have a well understanding on HIPPA laws and rights. A HIPPA test will be required by all staff members.

Environmental issues; This will be addressed with board members and staff members will be briefed on the handling of an issue if one were to arise.

Environmental and social impacts and regulatory compliance. Regulatory compliance is expected of staff members, board of directors, and stakeholders in a professional manner. This will impact the environmental and social impacts of the organization in the community. The board of directors will be expected to handle tough situations involving these type of impacts.

References

1. Nonprofit Risk Management Center. 2020. Influence Matters: Stakeholders And Risk – Nonprofit Risk Management Center. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 September 2020].
2. Hester, R., 2020. Lack Of Access To Mental Health Services Contributing To The High Suicide Rates Among Veterans.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Stakeholder Relationships and Alliance Discussion Essay Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.