A look into Research Hierarchy
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Please complete the Research Hierarchy Activity before beginning this assignment to provide context for the assignment.
You can see how each sort of study fits into a certain hierarchy now that you’ve done the Research Hierarchy task. This is significant since it includes details on each type of research study, such as its validity, rigor, soundness, and reliability. With this in mind, you will now analyze the twenty articles offered below to get experience determining which article corresponds to which level of the research hierarchy.
The Regis Library has a list of twenty nursing journal articles available for you to read. These papers come from a variety of research methods, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and expert opinions.
B. P. Cotton and G. G. Ferszt (2018). The role of NPs in opioid use disorder medication-assisted treatment. Nurse Practitioner, vol. 43, no. 5, p. 8.
E. R. Currie, B. J. Christian, P. S. Hinds, S. J. Perna, C. Robinson, S. Day, and K. Meneses (2016). At the end of life, parents’ thoughts on neonatal intensive care. 478489. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 478489.
Y. Dai and J. Livesley (2018). A comprehensive study of the effectiveness and acceptability of preoperative psychological preparation programs for children undergoing elective surgery using a mixed method approach. 20222037 in Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(9).
M. L. Goh, E. N. K. Ang, Hong-Gu H., Y. Chan, and K. Vehviläinen-Julkunen (2018). In a Singapore hospital, patient happiness is connected to nursing workload. 692713 in Clinical Nursing Research.
S. Górska, K. Forsyth, and D. Maciver (2018). A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on the lived experience of dementia. Gerontologist, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. e180e196.
Griffiths, P., Recio-Saucedo, A., Dall’Ora, C., Briggs, J., Maruotti, A., Meredith, P., Recio-Saucedo, A., Dall’Ora, C., Briggs, J., Maruotti, A., Meredith, P., Recio-Saucedo, A., Reci
J. Ball (2018). A thorough review of the relationship between nurse staffing and nursing care omissions. 74(7), 14741487 in Journal of Advanced Nursing.
J. M. Guirguis-Blake, Y. L. Michael, L. A. Perdue, E. L. Coppola, and T. L. Beil (2018). Updated evidence report and systematic evaluation for the US Preventive Services Task Force on interventions to prevent falls in older individuals. 319(16), 17051716, Journal of the American Medical Association.
E. M. Harvey, D. Freeman, A. Wright, J. Bath, V. K. Peters, G. Meadows, and B. R. Collier (2019). The impact of advanced nurse teamwork training on the effectiveness of trauma teams. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 715
L. Hooper, A. Abdelhamid, D. Bunn, T. Brown, C. D. Summerbell, and C. M. Skeaff (2015). The impact of total fat consumption on body weight. 1-213 in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
De Souza Nogueira, L., de Cassia Gengo e Silva Butcher, R., Reboreda, J. Z., Silva Bonfim, A. K., & Padilha, K. G. Jokh Chaaya, D. A., de Souza Nogueira, L., de Cassia Gengo e Silva Butcher, R., Reboreda, J. Z., Silva Bonfim, A. K., & (2018). The relationship between pulse pressure and the risk of death in critically ill individuals. Advanced Critical Care, AACN, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 118125.
A. J. L. King, R. Johnson, H. Cramer, S. Purdy, and A. L. Huntley (2018). A systematic evaluation and qualitative evidence synthesis of community case management and unplanned hospital admissions in patients with heart failure. 74(7), 14631473, Journal of Advanced Nursing.
H. Li, Y. Shao, Z. Xing, Y. Li, Y. Li, S. Wang, M. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li,
J. Sun (2019). A mixedmethods systematic evaluation of nursing staff napping on nightshifts. 291312 in Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(2).
N. Lök, K. Bademli, and M. Canbaz (2018). A randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of anger management education on teenage rage expression and self-esteem. 7581 in Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, vol. 32, no. 1.
C. Mabire, A. Dwyer, A. Garnier, and J. Pellet. Mabire, A. Dwyer, A. Garnier, and A. Garnier (2018). The effectiveness of nursing discharge planning treatments for elder inpatients sent home was studied in a meta-analysis. 788799. Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 788799.
F. Milligan, F. Martinez, and S. H. Aal M. A., S. A. Ahmed, B. Joby, J. S. Matalam,… S. S. Melepeedikayil, Melepeedikayil, Melepeedikayil, Melep (2018). Anxiety and depression in cancer patients are assessed. S18S23 in British Journal of Nursing, 27(10).
Relationships between glycemic management and cardiovascular fitness, Moxley, E. W., Smith, D., Quinn, L., and Park, C. (2018). 422428 in Biological Research for Nursing.
Z. Rahimimoghadam, Z. Rahemi, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat, Z. Sadat (2019). Pilates workouts and people with chronic renal disease’s quality of life 34, 3540 in Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice.
L. Sasso, M. Hayter, G. Catania, G. Aleo, M. Zanini, A. Bagnasco, L. Sasso, M. Hayter, G. Catania, G. Aleo, M. Zanini, M. Zanini, M. Zanini, M. Zanini, M. Zanini (2019). Opportunities for nursing researchers in incorporating qualitative research into randomized controlled trials. 705706. Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 705706.
M. VonStein, B. L. Buchko, C. Millen, D. Lampo, T. Bell, and A. B. Woods (2019). In intensive care patients, the effect of a scheduled nurse intervention on thirst and dry mouth. The American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 4146.
H.-E. Yeom (2018). In Korean men and women, there are gender disparities in climacteric symptoms and associated conditions. Applied Nursing Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 2128.
Instructions for the Assignment
In preparation for this task, go over all of the articles. You will list one journal article for each of the seven levels of the research hierarchy pyramid using this Research Hierarchy Template (Word) (you will not need to use all twenty articles to complete the hierarchy; you will use a total of seven of the twenty articles). Articles will not be used at more than one level in the hierarchy.
After you’ve found one journal article that matches to each level of the hierarchy, write a one- to two-sentence statement for each one to explain why you chose it and assigned it to that level of the hierarchy. Using the Research Hierarchy paper that you submit, write one to two sentences defending your choice.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.