AI and Governance: The Challenge of Ensuring Transparency and Accountability
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
AI and Governance: The Challenge of Ensuring Transparency and Accountability
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used by governments to enhance their efficiency, effectiveness, and decision-making capabilities. However, as AI is becoming more sophisticated and widespread, it raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and fairness. Ensuring transparency and accountability in AI governance is essential to prevent unintended consequences, bias, and ethical dilemmas that can arise from its use.
One of the main challenges in AI governance is ensuring transparency in how AI algorithms and systems operate. AI algorithms are often complex and difficult to understand, even by the experts who design them. This lack of transparency makes it challenging to assess the fairness of AI decisions, understand how decisions are made, and detect errors or biases. For example, an AI system that decides who gets a loan might be trained on historical data that reflects past discriminatory practices, resulting in biased outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that the design and implementation of AI systems are transparent and accountable to address issues related to fairness and bias.
Another challenge is accountability in AI governance. Who is responsible for decisions made by AI systems? Is it the designers, the users, or the AI systems themselves? Accountability must be established to ensure that individuals and institutions are held responsible for the consequences of AI decisions. This can be achieved by establishing clear regulations and standards that define the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders involved in AI governance, such as developers, users, and regulators.
Moreover, governments should be accountable for the ethical use of AI. They should establish frameworks that promote ethical and responsible AI development and use. For example, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides a legal framework for protecting individuals’ rights in the processing of their personal data. It establishes the principle of “privacy by design” and requires organizations to be transparent about the data they collect, the purposes for which they use it, and the rights of individuals in relation to their data.
Another important aspect of AI governance is ensuring that AI systems are fair and unbiased. AI systems can perpetuate or amplify existing social biases and discrimination if the data used to train them is biased or the algorithms are not designed to avoid discrimination. Governments should take steps to ensure that AI systems are designed and tested to prevent bias and discrimination. For example, the use of explainable AI can help identify and mitigate the effects of biases in AI decision-making.
Finally, it is essential to involve stakeholders in the development and implementation of AI systems. Stakeholders include individuals, communities, civil society organizations, and private sector actors. Involving stakeholders in AI governance can increase trust and accountability, promote transparency, and ensure that AI systems are designed to address the needs and concerns of all members of society.
In conclusion, AI governance is a complex and challenging issue that requires transparency, accountability, and fairness. Governments must take a proactive approach to ensure that AI systems are designed and implemented with these principles in mind. This can be achieved by establishing clear regulations and standards, promoting ethical and responsible AI development and use, ensuring the fairness and impartiality of AI systems, and involving stakeholders in the development and implementation of AI systems. By doing so, we can harness the power of AI to improve people’s lives while minimizing unintended consequences and ethical dilemmas.
AI and Governance: The Challenge of Ensuring Transparency and Accountability
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
![]() |
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.