Almighty Latin Kings and Queens Nation Sociology Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Almighty Latin Kings and Queens Nation Sociology Discussion
Deposit your answers to the correct Assignments Link.
Read the following scenario and answer the questions
Luis Francisco is the leader of the Almighty Latin Kings and Queens Nation. He was convicted of murder in 1998 and sentenced to life imprisonment plus forty-five years. Luis Francisco’s life has been filled with
displacement, poverty, and chronic predatory delinquency. The son of a prostitute in Havana, at the age of nine he was sent to prison for robbery.
He had trouble in school, and teachers described him as having attention problems; he dropped out in the seventh grade. On his nineteenth birthday in 1980, he emigrated to the United States and soon became a
gang member in Chicago, joining the Latin Kings.
After moving to the Bronx, he shot and killed his girlfriend in 1981. He fled to Chicago and was not apprehended until 1984. Sentenced to nine years for second degree manslaughter, Luis Francisco ended up in a New
York prison, where he started a prison chapter of the Latin Kings. As King Blood, Inka, First Supreme Crown, Francisco ruled the two thousand Latin Kings in and out of prison. Disciplinary troubles erupted when some
Kings were found stealing from the organization.
Infuriated, King Blood wrote to his street lieutenants and ordered their termination. Federal authorities, who had been monitoring Francisco’s mail, arrested thirty-five Latin Kings. The other thirty-four pled guilty; only
Francisco insisted on a trial, where he was fund guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.
Summarize the three developmental theories: a)life-course theory, b)latent-trait theory, and c)trajectory theory.
Identify and explain the life-course concepts that help define the life course view.
Using the above Life-course concepts, explain Luis’s behavior patterns.
How would a latent trait theorist explain his escalating delinquent activities?
6 PointsRead the following scenario, answer the following questions and post your responses to the Assignments Link.You are the governor of your state. In 1991, when Steven B. was a 16 -year- old high school wrestler, he and a teammate raped and severely beat a young girl who asked them for a ride home from a party. Though never in serious trouble before the attack, Steven was involved in an ongoing pattern of school misbehavior, substance abuses, and pety scrapes with the law. Those who knew him recognized that he had a short attention span and poor study habits, and he seemed to be impulsive and lacking in self-control.
There were allegations that he was sexually aggressive and tried to force himself on young girls, but no formal charges were ever made. While out on bail, Steven escaped to Europe with the help of his wealthy parents. After wandering the continent for two years, he settled in a small French town. There, Steve, now known as “Paul”, established a thriving wine shop, became a respected community member, married a local woman, and fathered tow children. He even served on the town council. However, after more than a decade abroad, Steven’s true identity became known when he was involved in a minor traffic accident.
After some negotiation, French authorities turned him over to American authorities, and he has been returned home to face the outstanding charges. Steven now asks that you pardon him so he can return to his home and family. He argues that his friend, who was convicted of rape and served time in prison, was the one who actually attacked the girl.
Steven claims he merely held her down and prevented her from escaping; his friend substantiates the story. He now realizes he was wrong, but he points out that he has liven an exemplary life for the last 10 years, that his family needs him, and that he poses no danger to society. He has offered to apologize to the victim and make financial restitution before returning to France.
Pick a specific life course or latent trait theory from chapter 5 – either a)age-graded or b)general theory of crime – that you think best explains Steven’s behavior.
Identify, explain the theory and state why you think it fits.
Do you believe that Steven is unlikely to commit another violent act as an adult, even though he did so as a juvenile? Why? Or why not?
Is it possible, now that Steven is an adult, that his impulsive personality has moderated and he has regained that ability to control his own behavior?
Or do you believe that behavior patterns originating in childhood, such as lack of self-control, persist into adulthood?
Should the justice system distinguish between a young offender who commits a single act of violence and a chronic offender who is repeatedly involved in criminal acts? This is your opinion.
5 PointsDeposit your answers in the correct Assignments Link.Go to these websites for more information.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Harris_and_Dylan_Klebold http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kinkel/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurston_High_School_shootingRead the following scenario and answer the following questions.The most violent school event of the century took place on April 20,1999, when two students, Eric Harris,18, and Dylan Klebold,17, shot and killed 12 students and a teacher and seriously wounded 22 others at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. In addition to the shootings, their murderous rampage involved planting 50 homemade bombs in different locations in the school in a planned effort to blow up the entire school in a blaze of fire. When they were finished killing and wounding their fellow students they committed suicide. There is limited evidence of a dysfunctional family background, and the families were not criminogenic. For example, the parents of Kip Kinkel were both respected high school teachers, and none of the other parents manifested severe family problems. With the exception of some minor issues regarding school disciplinary action, none of the killers had a prior record of severe delinquency. Most of them seemed to experience some form of alienation or separation from their high school classmates.
Using what you have learned so far,
which theories would best explain this action? (Use chapters 3,4,or 5).
Pick two theories.
Identify, explain and justify the theories you have chosen including the chapter(s) from which you choose your theories.
10 PointsDeposit your answers to the correct Assignments Link.This is a summary assignment based on information from any of the chapters you have read so far.Go to this websitePBS FrontlineRead all the information found at this site, than answer the following questions.Questions
After reading the information on this website, what would you say are the best predictors of violence in children?
Juvenile delinquents are considered less responsible for their behavior than adult offenders and therefore considered less culpable. In the administration of justice, the emphasis is more on the youth’s personality and the motivation for the illegal act than the offense itself, emphasis is more on
treatment and rehabilitation than on punishment.
How was this exemplified in each of the cases?
If you had been the judge would your dispositions been different in each of the four cases? How or how not?
What would have been your reasoning?
Pick one case, describe it and apply a theory or theories that you think best explain it. Give your reasoning.
Click on the tab at the top right of the page titled: Facts and Statistics.
Look at Child or Adult? A Century Long View as well as Juvenile Verses Adult Justice. Summarize what you find in the two areas.
At the bottom of the page, click on: From Both Sides of the Bench.
Choose two items, identify and summarize them.
Almighty Latin Kings and Queens Nation Sociology Discussion
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.