Argument, Political Sciences Global Justice
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Global Justice Paper 3 Prompts?
?
General Instructions?
?
Choose one of the following 5 prompts and answer it in a paper of 2,000 words maximum.?
?
Some general advice: Basically, what you should be doing in a paper like this is making an argument. You will have some position (a thesis) that you want to argue for, and everything in your paper should play some role in contributing to your argument. You should be taking positions and making arguments of your own. That is, its not enough to reproduce the arguments of the authors weve read. This is an exercise in developing your own analytical skills, not an exercise in recalling information or (mere) reading comprehension. You should be drawing on the course readings to help develop/support your arguments (or to explore possible objections to them), but your own arguments should be the centerpiece of the paper.?
?
Some things you should do:?
?
-Identify which prompt you are answering.?
?
-Write as clearly and directly as you can to effectively communicate your ideas. This often means using plain language, as opposed to trying to sound academic or intellectual.?
?
-Clearly state your thesis near the beginning of the paper.?
?
-Make sure you answer the prompt.?
?
-Provide arguments/evidence to back up your claims.?
?
-When you use a quote or other piece of evidence, make sure you explain to the reader what you think it shows (what role its playing in your argument) and why.?
?
-Explicitly communicate what each part of your paper is contributing to your overall argument and how the different parts of your paper relate to each other.?
?
-Sometimes its also a good idea to introduce what you think is the clearest/strongest objection to your position and try to answer it.?
And, if you want more advice, here are the guides to philosophical writing also linked on the syllabus:?
?
The Pink Guide: https://sites.google.com/a/wellesley.edu/pinkguidetophilosophy/ ?The Jim Pryor Guide: http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/guidelines/writing.html?
?
A note on grading: I will generally be more lenient with the memo grades and less lenient with the paper grades. The memos are short and meant to be exploratory, but you have more space to develop your ideas in the papers and they should generally be more complete and polished.?
Prompts?
?
What, if any, restrictions are states morally justified in placing on emigration (people moving permanently out of the state)? In your answer, draw on at least two of the following: Abizadeh, Carens, Stilz, Ypi. (Note: Possible restrictions include, but are not limited to, bans on emigration, taxes levied at the point of emigration, taxes on foreignearned income after emigration, and requirements that emigrants perform some amount of service in their home country before leaving.)?
?
In The Case for Open Borders, Carens makes what he calls the cantilever argument, which says, roughly: if its the case that we should recognize freedom of movement within states as a human right, then we should also recognize freedom of movement across state borders (including the right to enter and settle in another state of ones own choosing) as a human right. Do you think the cantilever argument succeeds???
?
Note: Dont argue for or against the position that we should recognize freedom of movement within states as a human right. What you should do is assess whether one who accepts that position should also, to be logically consistent, accept the position that we should recognize freedom of movement across state borders as a human right.??
?
If you do think the cantilever argument succeeds, why? Be sure to address at least one objection to the cantilever argument and explain why you think the objection fails.?
?
If you dont think the cantilever argument succeeds, why not? What is your alternative view and why do you think its preferable to Carenss??
?
How (if at all) should an institutions or concepts past entanglement with racist ideas or practices affect our assessment of that institution or concept today? Answer with reference to ONE of the following: immigration policy, international human rights law, or the concept of sovereignty. Draw on at least two of the following in your answer: Fine, Mills, Mutua, Anghie, Valdez.?
?
?
?
Imagine you buy goods from a large company that you know employs subcontractors who operate sweatshops. In these sweatshops, workers work excessively long hours in unsanitary and unsafe conditions, are frequently subject to harassment, and are not allowed to unionize or take sick days. As an individual consumer, are you required by justice to do anything to mitigate the harms workers in the sweatshops suffer? If not, why not? If so, what are you required to do and why???
?
How (if at all) and why would your answer change if you were the CEO of the large company instead of a consumer???
?
Draw on at least two of the following in your answer: Young, Nagel, Julius.?
?
Assume you are a participant in global politics, looking to promote reform in line with your favorite theory of global justice. You must choose whether to focus your energy on civil-society activism (e.g., participating in protests and consumer boycotts, working with and through NGOs and transnational activist movements) or on working directly through formal political institutions (e.g., voting in elections, volunteering on political candidates campaigns, lobbying elected officials). How should you choose to focus your energy? What are the major moral reasons for and against each option? Draw on at least two course readings to support your answer.?
Sources:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.