Assessing A Variety of Individuals and Various Disorders
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Assessing A Variety of Individuals and Various Disorders
Telehealth provides a way for diagnosing and assessing a variety of individuals and various disorders. It provides an alternative way for individuals to receive treatment amongst a variety of situations. While there are many advantages for using telehealth, there are also disadvantages. For example, telehealth does not provide face to face contact, therefore making physical observations difficult. Evaluating the patient requires various assessments, thus making a correct diagnosis may be difficult. Although telehealth may produce challenges for assessing mild, moderate, and severe mental health disorders, the practitioner can modify assessment procedures which may assist in making a correct diagnosis when using telehealth to conduct assessments (Luxton, Pruitt & Osenbach, 2014). It also allows individuals to be assessed when travel or location is a concern. The professional must ensure they are following ethical principles and telepsychology guidelines as outlined in Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists (2013) in attempt to stay in compliance with laws and regulations while conducting telehealth services. Evaluating the situation according to APA guidelines is the best place to start according to Harris & Younggren (2011). This includes conducting a risk benefit analysis of conducting telehealth interventions versus other options. Every situation and the severity of the mental health condition varies, therefore it is the responsibility for the psychologist to assess the client and make a decision based on what is best for the client. For example, if the client should be referred to alternative interventions rather than telehealth due to the severity of the mental health disorder, then this needs to be communicated.
Research has been conducted on integrating evidence-based practices by telehealth. Gros et al. (2013) conducted studies using evidence-based practices by telehealth versus traditional in-person treatments and reported that outcomes were very close to equivalent. The differences that were reported were minor differences and were inconsistent across studies. In addition, technology such as the use of smartphones allows behavioral health care more accessible, efficient, and interactive as well as improving the distribution of evidence-based treatments (Luxton, McCann, Bush, Mishkind & Reger, 2011). Although telehealth is being used more and more as technology advances, it is important to continue research and consider best options for the client.
The population identified in week one were individuals in adulthood. This includes young adults in search of a career path as well as adults already established in their career looking to advance in their current career or in search of a new career. Based on the client focus, specialty, and treatment preferences, clients could be assessed in a variety of ways. The use of traditional in-person, telephone, texted based, virtual, or video telehealth could provide appropriate options for individuals. While all these options provide services in a variety of ways, it really comes down to the needs of the client. Individuals who prefer traditional therapy options and are within traveling distance, this may be an appropriate option for them. Sometimes individuals may not be comfortable with alternative therapy sessions such as using video and they may prefer traditional sessions. The psychologist would also be able to observe behaviors in person, which provides an advantage. Individuals who choose to discuss therapy sessions over the phone may be an option as well. However, there may be some draw backs as sometimes it can be difficult to gain a complete understanding about the situation for various reasons. Sometimes the phone may be static or it may be difficult to hear one another, therefore there may be some confusion. In addition, client behaviors would not be able to be observed. Text based sessions may be an option as well, but the client would need to be aware that the information may not be secure using this method. In addition, it may be a longer process as typing typically takes longer than having a verbal conversation. Text based may allow the client to gather their thoughts and review them prior to sending the information. This may provide the client additional time to think about things and how they want to portrait themselves. The drawback would be that the psychologist would not be able to observe behaviors and would not hear the clients voice as verbal communication such as their tone of voice, grammar, etc. may provide valuable information. Finally, virtual and video telehealth may also be appropriate for clients. This allows the client to engage in services in a comfortable environment and alleviates any travel. The psychologist would be able to conduct various assessments and observe behaviors. The professional would be able to speak with the client, observe behaviors, and conduct a session while being able to visually see the client. According to Baker & Bufka (2011) the psychologist must assess and communicate the benefits and risk that telehealth may pose with the client as well as having an understanding about when electronic-based interventions should be used and for whom. The use of telehealth technology at various levels increases the quality of life for diverse individuals (Miller, 2006).
As discussed, all of the above delivery methods have risks and benefits. It is essential prior to conducting any therapy session to obtain informed consent. In addition, it is also essential to communicate with the client privacy, security, and confidentiality. While the psychologist makes every attempt to maintain confidentiality and secure patient’s privacy, it must be communicated that delivering information using technology does not ensure the information will remain secure and private. In addition, personal and professional boundaries must be established as well as avoiding potential harm to the client and at times there may be an interruption of services. For example, information may get lost in cyberspace or at times the internet may not be working, thus causing an interruption in services. Communicating risks and benefits with the professional and client is essential and indicates attempt to uphold ethical standards and code of conduct.
Baker, D. C., & Bufka, L. F. (2011). Preparing for the telehealth world: Navigating legal, regulatory, reimbursement, and ethical issues in an electronic age. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 405-411. doi:10.1037/a0025037
Gros, D. F., Morland, L. A., Greene, C. J., Acierno, R., Strachan, M., Egede, L. E., … & Frueh, B. C. (2013). Delivery of evidence-based psychotherapy via video telehealth. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35(4), 506. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9363-4
Harris, E., & Younggren, J. N. (2011). Risk management in the digital world. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 412-418. doi:10.1037/a0025139
Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists. (2013). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. American Psychologist, 68(9), 791-800. doi:10.1037/a0035001
Luxton, D. D., McCann, R. A., Bush, N. E., Mishkind, M. C., & Reger, G. M. (2011). mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 505-512. doi:10.1037/a0024485
Luxton, D. D., Pruitt, L. D., & Osenbach, J. E. (2014). Best practices for remote psychological assessment via telehealth technologies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(1), 27-35. doi:10.1037/a0034547
Miller, T. W. (2006). Telehealth issues in consulting psychology practice. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(2), 82-90. doi:10.1037/1065-9218.104.22.168 ReplyReply to Comment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.