Assumption for the Implementation of the Project Plan
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Assumption for the Implementation of the Project Plan
Running Head: MTA OPEN GANGWAY PROJECT 1
MTA OPEN GANGWAY PROJECT 7
MTA Open Gangway Project
The assumption for the Implementation of the Project Plan
The MTA Open Gangway project is expected to solve the problem of train delays and customer congestions in the New York trains. However, the implementation of the plan is complex, and some of the things must be considered constant. The trains are expected to be open with no doors in between the cabins to reduce the time of boarding and to alight the train in real-time. In Montreal, the design suits the objectives and goals of the project perfectly. However, in New York is where the main problem is every weekend, evening, and morning. There are large masses of people who wait anxiously to board the train. Therefore it is right to assume that the project will help to reduce the problem of people crowding as the wait for the trains. It is not yet feasible to clarify that the open gangway train will help solve the problem of the train. According to other cities like London, who have the open gangway cars in operation and are less crowded than New York have indicated only a 10% effectiveness on the open gangway cars (MTA, 2020).
The New York subway system is one of the largest in the world without the improved tarns, and the biggest assumption is that the problem that exists right now is because of the lack of modern trains. It is assumed that the extra space created by the open gangway cars will have a significant effect of increasing the number of people carried per trip. It must also assume that the amount of time that will be saved during the exit and entry to the trains will be significant in solving the current problem. However, some factors, such as the length of the trains run in some lines, might be a hindrance to the assumptions made. For instance, the Washington Metro trains run different lengths of cars in every line. Given that the United States agency expects in Honolulu has refused to adopt the changes, and this creates a lot of problem to implementation of the plan (MTA, 2020). Therefore the corporation of the agencies must be present for the project to be successful.
Cross-cultural, Economic, and Geopolitical Factors that May Impact the Business Environment and Concept
The current system has led to a lot of complaints about people of different personalities on the train. Some say that the current system is dangerous because of overcrowding and lack of space to move around. Bad people take advantage of harassing others on the train, and others, especially the homeless people, have been accused of making customers uncomfortable because of the odor that comes from some of them. Gang-related activities have also been a problem on the train as the movement becomes a problem. The open gangway cars will offer more space for customers to move in case they feel uncomfortable in the spot they are in the car. The Metropolitan Transport Authority in New York has faced a lot of critics from the public because of the lack of concern in the state of the New York subway system (Cohen, 2020).
The geography of New York is demanding, and the right measures have to be taken to solve the problem. New York is the largest city in the United States, which is close to the ocean, and due to its position, the city attracts a lot of inhabitants. That is the main reason why the city is always overcrowded as many people live in it and move back and forth in other cities in the country for work. The open gangway cars will solve the problem of the geopolitics of the city by ensuring that the residents move out of the city faster and easier. There is a huge problem of where the money to fund the project will come from. The MTA is having big issues of how the project should be funded without causing financial issues or objections. The funds might be pulled from taxpayers, but it will mean that the State of New York has to increase the taxes that the New Yorkers pay. This is not easy to implement because the action will not be received well by the public. The other possible sourcing is from the fares charged on the passengers (Cohen, 2020). However, increasing fares to fund the project is not easy to implement and might take long procedures.
Legally and Ethically Compliant Environment of the Plan
The current management of the MTA subways is not working effectively and has to change with the introduction of the new open gangway cars. Legally each delay of the trains should be given a precise explanation. However, currently, the management does not do that as when there is a delay; the cause of the delay is not identified. The bureaucratic agency that manages the subway system just jumps into the conclusion that the crowding of passengers caused the delay. This happens despite that the delays must be logged with official explanations. The new open gangway cars must come along with a lot of changes to help improve the entire subway system. The management has to report all the issues and operations taking place in the subways system in the right way proposed by the agency. The main causes of delays, such as maintenance schedules, train slowdowns, and train breakages, must be reported from root to cause (Gannon, 2019). The bureaucracy of dwelling on overcrowding as the cause of problems in the system is illegal and should be discouraged. The passengers have the right to know why they are being delayed on the station by being given the right explanation.
The new trains will also maintain high levels of hygiene to avoid complaints from the passengers. The old cars are littered with trash and rats that disturb the comfort of passengers and violate environmental standards. The system relies on the autonomy of the computer, which might fail and cause a catastrophic outcome. The new open gangway project will consider replacing the old system with a new improve computer system to avoid causing harm to people due to the breakdown of the old system (Gannon, 2019). Due to overcrowding, people have died either in the trains or in the stations without the right action being taken. It was once reported that a person died on the train without people noticing or the authorities taking the right action, and when people were alighting at Queens, the person just fell. This I wrong ethically, and the open gangway cars are expected to offer space for immediate actions to be taken in such circumstances.
Incorporation of Stakeholder and Customer Diversity
The new open cars are revolutionary because of the open design because they offer more space for customers to move around. The doors of the cars will be wider than the previous cars such that the amount of time that the train will spend in a station will be minimized. The cars will be installed with modern technology that will improve customer experience. Delay is one of the greatest problems that customers are experiencing in the current subway system. The management is poor, the trains are old, and the right explanation to all the inconveniences is not well explained. The new cars will lead to the automation of the entire subway system such that the delays will be reduced with a significant margin (Waldek, 2020). The customers will be able to reach home or place of work faster than before. The congestion that is a norm in the current trains will not be a problem because more space will be provided, and entry and exit of customers will be made much easier. The alert systems ad advertisements in the cars will be improved, and any delay or inconvenience will be communicated effectively.
Time is money, as the saying goes. The time that will be saved in the stations as the pickup and drop off customers become faster will generate more money for the stakeholders of the subway system. Increased space means that more customers will be transported per trip ad a reduced time. The increase in the number of customers means more revenue from the fares paid. Saving of time in between trips also translates to more trips and more revenue. The new open gangway cars will improve the value of the company as the revenues improve. This will be great for stakeholders because the stock price of the agency will improve and attack more investors. There is a great future ahead of the MTA after the implementation of the open gangway project is completed. Both customers and stakeholders will feel the positive effects of the open gangway project like their lives will improve (Waldek, 2020).
Corporate Social Responsibility
The main objective of the open gangway cars is to improve the corporate social responsibility of the agency. The first goal is the provision of sustainable public transportation for passengers. The new cars will use a climate-resilient system that will help improve the fight for the improvement of current environmental problems. The cars will help improve the efficiency of energy in both the facilities and fleets. Improvement of the subway system will attract more people to prefer using public transport over the use of private cars (Salcedo, 2019). This will help in reducing the emission of carbon in the environment and improve on the fight against the destruction of the ozone layer.
The project implementation plan involves setting up a science-based target to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases and bring the temperatures low to 2 degrees centigrade. The target aims at determining all the paths for reducing greenhouse from both direct and indirect emissions. The project also aims at responding to the demand for transport services in New York. The current system is insufficient in satisfying the current demand for commuter services in the state. The response to the high demand will increase the amount of capital that will be used to improve the transport system even further. Therefore the success of the project will ensure that the community benefits not only in better transport services but also in the environment (Salcedo, 2019).
Cohen, M. (2020). MTA moves ahead with plans to buy up to 949 new subway cars with open gangway design. Retrieved from https://www.6sqft.com/mta-moves-ahead-with-plans-to-buy-up-to-949-new-subway-cars-with-open-gangway-design/
Gannon, D. (2019). NYC’s subway is finally starting to improve, MTA says. Retrieved from https://www.6sqft.com/nycs-subway-is-finally-starting-to-improve-mta-says/
MTA. (2020). Department of Environmental Sustainability and Compliance. Retrieved from https://new.mta.info/agency/environmental-sustainability-and-compliance
Salcedo, A. (2019). The MTA Has a $54 Billion Plan for the Subway. Now What? Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/19/nyregion/nyc-subway-plan.html
Waldek, S. (2020). Look Inside New York City’s Next-Generation Subway Cars. Retrieved from https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/look-inside-new-york-city-next-generation-subway-cars
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.