Avoidance of Conflict as A Style Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Avoidance of Conflict as A Style Discussion
Rahim (2011) identify five conflict styles. On pages 152-178 of your text, avoidance of conflict as a style is discussed. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of this style? What have been some of the dynamics you noticed when individuals and couples use avoidance in relationships? How do you feel when someone uses this in his or her relationship with you? What suggestion might you have for someone who primarily uses avoidance of conflict as a style? Responded to two peers
Peer1. eek 2 Discussion
After reviewing the chapter, the five conflict styles are avoiding, dominating (competing), compromising, obliging (accommodating), and integrating (collaborating). After taking the assessment it’s obvious that I use the style obliging. I can see how I have a tendency of putting others wants before my own because I want to make everyone happy, it also makes me feel good when I’m always giving to others. I may not realize so much that I do this because I am used to it but it’s something I am working on. Conflict styles are patterned responses, or clusters of behavior, that people use in conflict (Hocker, Berry, & Wilmot, 2022, p. 150). The disadvantages of constantly obliging, can make any relationship with someone accept the fact that the obliger will always give in to any situation. An obliging conflict style puts high value on a partner, but a low value on oneself. An obliging person elevates the options and actions of another person to make them feel better about a conflict. Advantages of an obliger can put out there that the person is complaisant. This means this person has the qualities that make one liked and easy to deal with. When individuals and couples use avoidance in relationships this can create an unhealthy toxic dynamic at times. Conflict avoidance is damaging for a relationship no matter which partner exhibits this behavior. To experience a healthy relationship, you must be sure that both people are not using conflict avoidance patterns. I feel this kind of behavior when used in his or in my relationships, is a form of unhealthy toxicity. Relationships shouldn’t be handled in that way. For example, I have dated a lot of people who had avoidant behavior styles, and, in the end, it always just made me feel insecure. With constant avoidant behavior between the two people, it can create resentment, hate, insecurities and just bring up very negative feelings towards each other while making the connection fall apart. My suggestion for someone who primarily uses avoidance of conflict as a style is to maybe be open to therapy or finding some form of support to dig deeper into why you carry this kind of conflict style with you. Then working with a professional in finding better ways to deal with the triggers so later there can be healthier patterns in your relationships.
Conflict styles can be described as various behaviors and ways a person responds when a conflict arises.
There are 5 conflict styles. They are accommodating, avoiding, collaborating, competing, and compromising. Accommodating is giving the opposing side what it wants even if it is at your own expense.
Avoiding is used to avoid the issue completely and avoid all conflict. Collaborating is integrating ideas from multiple people to come to one creative solution. Compromising is both parties involved in the conflict give up what they want to be equal and agree on one solution. Competing is when each party competes for what they want, and one side will win while the other loses.
After doing the survey in the textbook, I was neutral for four out of the five conflict styles. The two styles I resonated most with were avoiding and accommodating. I scored a twenty-two for avoiding and a twenty-four for accommodating. The advantages of having an avoiding style are not having to deal with conflict at all because of ignoring it. It is easy to do this rather than face the situation. The disadvantages of an avoiding style are it could escalate a situation because instead of facing it and talking it out, it will continue to carry on and grow into a worse situation. The advantage of an accommodating conflict style is I
will not disappoint people because I am giving them generally what they want. I am very go with the flow when it comes to situations so I find it easier to follow people and what they want to do. The disadvantage of this style is that I do not get to do what I want to do a lot of the time. People can view this as being a push over and I could risk getting walked all over and taken advantage of.
This can create more conflicts.
I have seen avoidance used many times in relationships and in individuals and it does not normally go over well. It is a very passive aggressive way of handling situations, and it does not solve anything.
It can create walls between people and make it difficult for communication in relationships. “Avoidance should not be a substitute for proper resolution, however; pushing back conflict indefinitely can and will lead to more (and bigger) conflicts down the line.”(2021). Communication is super important.
I do struggle with avoidance mainly because I have an issue with expressing my feelings and emotions into words. Sometimes, it is easier to avoid a situation and hope it blows over.
When the problem seems to worsen, I will figure out a resolution, but I am working on my communication skills.
My girlfriend puts a lot of emphasis on great communication skills and saying exactly how we are feeling so if she suddenly started using avoidance with me, I would understand her frustrations with me sometimes.
I know it is not a style that helps a situation, it worsens it.
My suggestion for a person who struggles with avoidance is to start by processing their feelings and learning how to speak it into existence in a healthy way.
Just talking about your feelings and emotions can benefit a person being able to communicate better. Doing everything you can to not shut yourself out is already a step in the right direction. Talk it out and do not be scared.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.