Brainstorming and Planning of Child Welfare Needs
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Brainstorming and Planning of Child Welfare Needs
Running head: CHILD WELFARE NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1
CHILD WELFARE NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2
Child Welfare Needs Assessment
Child Welfare Needs Assessment
The following major steps would be required for the child welfare needs assessment to complete the project. These include:
Step 1: Brainstorming and Planning
First of all, I will consider gathering all the concern key stakeholders who will tend to serve as the task force for the needs assessment regarding the child welfare project. In context, the group will include individuals in service delivery staff, leadership, consumers as well as volunteers. During the gathering, I will create questionnaires whereby I will be asking questions relating to various factors such as duration, frequency, scope severity and perceptions the project will take and aim (Cummings, 2016). Based on brainstorming, I will initiate validated methods like Modified Delphi Technique that is a simple meeting facilitation technique to give every participant an equal chance to contribute their voices as well as ideas regarding the concern project.
Step 2: Guiding Documents
I will collect and gather feedback that directly comes from the concern task force where then I will analyze. Thereafter, I will use the analyzed data to come up with concrete solutions to act as the guideline documents for the entire child welfare needs assessment. Besides, I will ensure that the documents are well attached and published in a comprehensive manner for both task force and stakeholders involved to clearly read and understand.
Step 3: secondary data collection
In step three, I will utilize the existing sources in formulating relevant information concerning the child welfare project. Moreover, I will use the secondary data or information to support the project’s questions in regards to my surveys, interviews and focus groups. Further, I will conduct an in-depth research on the available literatures for an effective understanding on research evidence state relating to the subjective area associating to the child welfare project (Child Welfare Strategy Group).
Step 4: Primary data collection
I will also utilize both methods of collecting primary data including qualitative and quantitative methods which will help me in collecting direct information concerning the child welfare project from the people I will be serving. Some of the primary data sources I will initiate include electronic or written surveys, moderated focus groups and key informant interviews.
Step 5: Data analysis
With all data required for the project, I will tend to use both qualitative and quantitative analysis to verify the results. During the analyzing, I will seek help from a statistician who will help to predict the outcomes of the results and to determine whether the data collected are valid and relevant to the project.
Some of the most significant stakeholders that I will prefer to include in the child welfare project include the government and the financial institutions. As a reason, it is evident that the project requires a heavy amount of capital to fund it to its completion. As such, the government and financial institutions will act as the funding sources as their contributions towards the t project will assist the organization to successfully complete the project without interference that may arise as a result of lack of adequate funds for the project sustainability (Stones, 2006). Furthermore, as Stone and colleagues (2006) suggest, I will call upon partnerships with the same goals and objectives to work together and sharing ideas relevant to the project. In addition, I will, also involves the community concerned to offer the first hand information regarding the challenges facing their children in day to day activities.
Question 1: Please provide an indication of which program will be utilized during the project implementation
Justification: Some of the programs to be used include Baltimore, GA, Jacksonville, FA, and Gwinnett Programs, GA
Question 2: Identify which role you will play
Justification: Referral agency
Question 3: How frequencies do you have interactions with NTF
Question 4: Which knowledge do you have in relation to your profession?
Justification: Working with NTF in demonstrating an overall children and families’ needs knowledge
Question 5: who will you engage in your project?
Justification: The community’s families will be engaged in the project where respect will be maintained to all the members.
Question 6: how will you offer your support?
Justification: all the stakeholders concerned will be given a chance to offer their ideas and the relevant one will be supported in respect to their expertise areas.
Question 7: what will be your workforce timeline?
Justification: all the concerned members are easily accessible and tend to respond to phone calls whenever they are needed.
Question 8: significant of the services to be offered
Justification: all the services to be offered are be focused on addressing the identified needs and requirements for the community.
Question 9: which things are been done so well in the project?
Justification: showing and demonstrating an honest interest regarding the well-being as well as safety of all children especially those in need of help.
Question 10: please show us how we can efficiently improve
Justification: increasing the number of families that are in need of the services concerning child welfare.
Child Welfare Strategy Group. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.aecf.org/work/child-welfare/child-welfare-strategy-group//
Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., & Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human relations, 69(1), 33-60.
Stone, S., D’andrade, A., & Austin, M. (2006). Educational services for children in foster care: Common and contrasting perspectives of child welfare and education stakeholders.Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1(2), 53-70.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.