BUS693 Global Feasibility Analysis Assignment

BUS693 Global Feasibility Analysis Assignment

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

BUS693 Global Feasibility Analysis Assignment

BUS693 Global Feasibility Analysis
The final assignment for this course is a Global Feasibility Analysis for a company that is considering market entry into a selected country with a particular product or service. The focus is a preliminary analysis to be presented to the executive team with recommendations for a go/no go decision. The purpose of the Final Project is for you to culminate the learning achieved in the course by describing your understanding and application of knowledge in the field of global business strategy through the analysis of a mini case.

Topics to be addressed within the paper include:

Description of the company and its products, goods or services.
Identification of the major drivers of globalization for the industry
Identification of a country for market entry
Analysis of the economic development stage of the country
Exploration of the risks and opportunities of the company doing business in the country.
Identification of strategic actions and measurements, to include performance priorities, sources of competitive advantage, and competitive strategy in the industry in the identified country.
Presentation of final recommendation with supporting rationale.
The Final Project:

Must be ten to fifteen double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
Must use at least five scholarly sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford Online Library.
Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Required Resources
Text
Review the following chapter in Total global strategy:

Chapter 10: Measuring Industry Drivers, Strategy Levers, Organization Factors, and Regional Focus
Total Possible Score: 25.00
Company: Products, Goods, Services, Industry
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – An appropriate company is chosen, and a thorough and comprehensive description of the company’s industry and its products or services is provided.
Proficient – An appropriate company is chosen, and a sufficient description of the company’s industry and its products or services is provided.
Basic – A company is chosen, and an adequate description of the company’s industry and its products and services is provided; however, the description lacks sufficient detail.
Below Expectations – A company is identified, but description of its industry and the products or services it offers is unclear or incomplete.
Non-Performance – Identification of the company, its industry, and the products, goods or services it offers is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Major Industry Globalization Drivers
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – The major industry globalization drivers are clearly identified and thoroughly supported by ample research.
Proficient – The major industry globalization drivers are identified and supported by research.
Basic – The major industry globalization drivers are identified and supported by research; however, detail is limited and insufficient.
Below Expectations – The major industry globalization drivers are vague or incompletely addressed and/or research support is insufficient.
Non-Performance – Identification of the major industry globalization drivers is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Country for Market Entry
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – The country for market entry is identified, the risks and opportunities of doing business within the country are explored, and the economic development stage of the country is identified and well-supported. Analysis is exceptionally detailed, creative, and fully supports the final recommendation.
Proficient – The country for market entry is identified, the risks and opportunities of doing business within the country are explored, and the economic development stage of the country is identified and supported. Analysis is sufficient to support the final recommendation.
Basic – The country for market entry is identified, the risks and opportunities of doing business within the country are explored, and the economic development stage of the country is identified. Analysis is adequate, but lacks detail and depth.
Below Expectations – Exploration of the target country is vague or limited, and doesn’t sufficiently address the risks, opportunities and/or the country’s economic development stage.
Non-Performance – The country for market entry and its risks, opportunities and economic development stage is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Strategy: Strategic Actions, Measurements, and Final Recommendation
Total: 5.00
Distinguished – Identification of strategic actions and measurements includes evaluation of the performance priorities, sources of competitive advantage, and competitive strategy in the industry in the identified country. Evaluation is detailed, creative and addressed with critical thought using the measures and methods introduced in the course and concludes with a well-supported final recommendation.
Proficient – Identification of strategic actions and measurements includes some evaluation of the performance priorities, sources of competitive advantage, and competitive strategy in the industry in the identified country. Evaluation uses measures introduced in the course and sufficiently supports the final recommendation.
Basic – Adequate identification of strategic actions and measurements is made and includes a minimal evaluation of the performance priorities, sources of competitive advantage, and competitive strategy in the industry in the identified country. More thorough treatment of one or more elements would have more strongly supported the final recommendation.
Below Expectations – Identification of strategic actions and measurements isn’t made, or doesn’t include a complete evaluation of the performance priorities, sources of competitive advantage, and/or competitive strategy in the industry in the identified country. These elements are necessary for a well-supported final recommendation.
Non-Performance – Identification of the strategic actions, measurements and final recommendation is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Creative Thinking: Solving Problems
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Develops a logical, consistent plan to solve a problem, and identifies consequences of the solution and can clearly communicate the reason for choosing the solution.
Proficient – Carefully chooses among alternatives, develops a logical, consistent plan to problem solving.
Basic – Takes into account and eliminates less acceptable approaches to problem solving.
Below Expectations – Takes into account a single approach and uses the approach to problem solving.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Critical Thinking: Conclusions and Related Outcomes
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and clearly reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
Proficient – Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
Basic – Conclusions and related outcomes are identified and minimally reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
Below Expectations – Conclusions and related outcomes are not logical or reflective of student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA Formatting
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper; however, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. Layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Page Requirement
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirements predetermined in the assignment description.
Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement.
Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Resource Requirement
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Provides ample sources and uses the correct amount of sources from the specified search agents.
Proficient – Provides the approximate number of sources, while using some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment instructions.
Basic – Provides over half of the sources required in the assignment instructions.
Below Expectations – Barely provides adequate sources and unable to include sources from specified search agents.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

BUS693 Global Feasibility Analysis Assignment

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.