BUSM4176 Introduction to Management Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
BUSM4176 Introduction to Management Assignment
Hello Management Arians
I wanted to clarify the referencing requirements for A1. To be eligible for a mark of CR, you have to cite (in RMIT Harvard style)::
(1) The Schroth article
(2) The Ted Talk
(3) Three academic journal articles (e.g., not the text book, not lecture slides, not newspapers, not blogs)
To be eligible for a mark of HD, you will need Six academic journal articles
There are journal articles you may wish to use in the Supplemental Readings, but you may also go to the library to find articles that are closer to the points you are trying to make. Please go to the online library portal for assistance.
Course code and name: BUSM4176 Introduction to Management
Assignment name: Scenario Analysis: What does it mean to be an effective manager in a diverse workforce?
Assignment due date: Week 4, Friday by 23:59
Length: 750 words (excluding references) # + 10%acceptable
Learning Objectives Assessed:
Learning outcomes This assignment task addresses the following Course Learning Outcomes : CLO2: Research management theory and explain how this theory applies to contemporary and socially responsible practices. CLO4: Critically reflect on the relationship between management theory and management research evidence and communicate your knowledge of responsible management practices.
Analysis of your managing and management work
Assignment task: What do I need to do?
This assignment asks you to consider, ‘what does it mean to be an effective manager in a diverse workforce?’ It requires you to read and synthesise information from current research articles in order to write an informed response.
Rationale: Why is this important?
(1) The contemporary workplace is diverse, global, and constantly changing. Effective managers understand their personal style of leadership in order to lead and manage employees from diverse backgrounds.
(2) This assignment task will help you develop your skills in research, critical thinking and evaluation. You will also develop your ability to analyse your response to key concepts/issues in a reading and communicate your ideas clearly in a short piece of academic writing.
How do I complete this assignment task?
- Read the ‘Instructions on how to complete Assignment 1 ’ guide.
- Locate and read the rubric for assignment 1 – check that your essay is assessable based on those criteria
- Use Harvard EasyCite to correctly reference your article and cite any direct quotations or paraphrasing used. (Links to an external site.)
- NOTE: Use a minimum of 3 academic references. (To get an ‘HD ‘ you would need a minimum of 6 additional references. Three would give you enough to pass.)
Feedback on the quality of your work will be provided online and is based on the rubric criteria.
BUSM4176 – A1 – 1910
BUSM4176 – A1 – 1910 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeComprehension
6.0 to >4.8 Pts
Has understood and responded to each of the task requirements appropriately. Anticipates how ethical, cultural, social and team (ESCT) issues may affect managerial behaviour.
4.8 to >4.2 Pts
Has understood and responded to most task requirements appropriately. Addresses most ethical, cultural, social and team (ESCT) issues which may affect managerial behaviour.
4.2 to >3.6 Pts
Has understood some task requirements and attempted to respond appropriately. Addresses one or two ethical, cultural, social and team (ESCT) issues which may affect managerial behaviour.
3.6 to >2.9 Pts
Limited understanding of the task was evident, but some requirements are missing. Marginally address how ethical, cultural, social and team (ESCT) issues may affect managerial behaviour.
2.9 to >0 Pts
No evidence that the student has understood what is required in this task. No attempt to address how ethical, cultural, social and team (ESCT) issues may affect managerial behaviour.
6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeStructure Synthesis of Research
4.0 to >3.2 Pts
Cohesive paragraph structure consistently encourages engagement with the content. New information from research is synthesised and presented thematically (topic by topic) to address the assessment question in an analytical way.
3.2 to >2.8 Pts
Cohesive paragraph structure supports engagement with the content. Uses discrete paragraphs to present information. New material from research is structured into themes to address the assessment question in an analytical way.
2.8 to >2.4 Pts
Some effort to achieve cohesive paragraph structure. Ideas not always presented in discrete paragraphs. Some effort to include new material from research into themes to address the assessment question in an analytical way.
2.4 to >2.0 Pts
Has used an essay structure to organise information logically. But has presented response composed of a series of discrete paragraphs based on the summary of main ideas from each article. This essay reads more like a book report than a piece of analysis.
2.0 to >0 Pts
Limited or no attempt at an essay structure. Information presented randomly or as a series of question/answers only. No sense of cohesion between ideas. No evidence for synthesis of new ideas from research. No analysis attempted.
4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten Expression
3.0 to >2.4 Pts
Uses discipline-specific language appropriate for an academic or professional audience. Writing is fluent and uses appropriate paragraph/sentence structures. No critical language or grammatical errors.
2.4 to >2.1 Pts
Includes discipline-specific language sufficient for an academic or professional audience. Writing is generally fluent and uses mostly appropriate paragraph/sentence structures. Minor language or grammatical errors usually do not interfere with meaning, but some editing and proofreading is required.
2.1 to >1.8 Pts
Some discipline-specific language included to meet general expectations of an academic or professional audience. Writing is generally clear and mostly uses appropriate paragraph/ sentence structures. Editing and proofreading would reduce errors and improve clarity.
1.8 to >1.5 Pts
Limited use of discipline-specific language which may not always meet expectations of an academic or professional audience. Inconsistent paragraph and sentence structures. Language and grammatical errors are frequent. Little evidence of proofreading or editing.
1.5 to >0 Pts
Limited vocabulary. Inappropriate or incorrect use of discipline-specific language. Consistent and numerous errors in writing (grammar, paragraph and sentence structure) make reading difficult. No evidence for editing or proofreading.
3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeResearch and referencing skills
2.0 to >1.6 Pts
Uses academic research skills to select 8 or more current, credible and authoritative academic references. The student has considered how the articles relate directly to assessment requirements. Uses Harvard referencing style and in-text citations with no errors.
1.6 to >1.4 Pts
Uses academic research skills to select 6 or more current, credible and authoritative academic references. Some evidence that the student understands the relevance of the articles to the assessment requirements. Uses Harvard referencing style and in-text citations with few errors.
1.4 to >1.2 Pts
Uses academic research skills to select 4 or more current, credible and authoritative Academic references. Attempt to understand relevance of the articles to the assessment requirements. Uses Harvard referencing style and in-text citations, but with errors.
1.2 to >1.0 Pts
Uses academic research skills to source 3 academic references. No real evidence that the student understands relevance of the articles to assessment requirements. Limited attempt at using Harvard referencing style. In-text citations are either missing or show errors throughout.
1.0 to >0 Pts
Has not located 3 academic references or selected references do not meet the task requirements. Uses general web searches to locate online webpages or articles rather than library databases. Little or no attempt to use a referencing style or include in-text citations.
2.0 pts Total points: 15.0
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.