Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Corporate Communication Preparation Research Paper
Hilliard argues that the key to a successful interview is preparation. I agree and would also argue that the key to success in general is also preparation. As an interviewer, it is important that I have a clear understanding of interviewee. Yes, I’m seeking to learn more and to have them share their story, but I want them to do it in an organized fashion so that I’m setting them up for success to be understood.
Hilliard argues that the writer should dig deep and I couldn’t agree more. The interesting details and richest stories often lie deep down and can be gracefully dug up while seeking truth. In corporate interviews, I believe there is no difference on the extent of preparation required.
If I am putting together a piece for a company, I want it to be detailed, accurate, and accomplish our defined goal. In order to do that, I am going to have to do my research and be adequately prepared. “Be sure your research is accurate by choosing your sources carefully and correctly and by evaluating what your sources tell you.
Be careful of individual points of view” (Hilliard, 2015, p. 270). Hilliard brings up a solid point to be intentional about how to gather research. This is also applicable in corporate communication. Hilliard adds that we want the facts first and that interpretation comes later (Hilliard, 2015).
The interviewer needs to be well educated on the atmosphere of the interview itself, as well as the feelings that might arise and have a strategic plan how to navigate such obstacles. In order to maintain control and be the driving force of direction, the interviewer must be ready for a number of scenarios and be prepared to navigate them successfully.
One of the most successful interviewers of all times is said to be Barbara Walters (Hilliard, 2015). Hilliard attributes a lot of her success to her extensive research she had her staff conduct prior to an interview. “From the research report Walters developed a list of more than 100 probe questions, only a fraction of which could be used in the actual interview” (Hilliard, 2015, p. 269).
She had her staff compile a large research report and then she created a long list of questions to cover her basis in the event that the interview went different directions. She conducted very successful interviews that sometimes led to headline-making statements that affected world affairs (Hilliard, 2015).
Her success is attributed to intensive research and preparation. The same goes for corporate communication and interviewers who need to ask educated and well-versed questions in order to conduct an intelligent conversation that will be beneficial to viewers. As for the position of the interviewee relative to myself, I see that as irrelevant.
My desire is to be respectful of others, regardless of status or seniority. I would not talk to a subordinate any different than a superior. James 2 is an excellent application of this scenario warning us as Christians against favoritism. We are called to treat others equally and with respect and ultimately, with the love of Christ. Scripture warns us of treating those in fancy clothes better than we treat the poor and needy.
Just because I might have authority over someone is irrelevant in how I speak to and treat them. When I look at Jesus as a perfect example, coming to serve others even though he was given authority over everything. Even if I was interviewing a superior, I can still ask deep and controversial questions while still remaining respectful.
Hilliard provided helpful techniques to remember. He suggests knowing probable answers so that as interviewers we can prepare for appropriate probe questions (Hilliard, 2015). He added to double check all the facts, write with intention and be specific with questions. In order to follow these suggestions effectively, it is going to require some extensive preparation.
As an interviewer I am trying to dive deep into the thoughts, opinions, and experiences of an interviewee. I not only need research on the interviewee, but I also need detailed goals and an outline of the interview to assure that I am covering the desired content.
Hilliard, R. L. (2015). Writing for television, radio, and new media. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Corporate Communication Preparation Research Paper
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.