- Expert Academic and Article Professional Writing Service
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
Corruption in the allocation of public housing
Corruption in the allocation of public housing
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Corruption in the allocation of public housing
Corruption in the allocation of public housing refers to the act of using one’s position or influence to secure housing or other benefits for themselves or their associates, rather than awarding them through a fair and competitive process. This type of corruption can have significant negative consequences for those in need of public housing, as well as for the overall integrity of the public housing system.Corruption in the allocation of public housing
One type of corruption in the allocation of public housing is known as “nepotism.” This occurs when housing or other benefits are awarded to a family member or close associate of a government official or employee, rather than going through a fair and competitive process. This type of corruption can lead to a lack of access to housing for those who need it most, as well as a lack of accountability in the allocation process.
Another type of corruption in the allocation of public housing is known as “bribery.” This occurs when individuals or companies provide money or other forms of financial support to government officials or employees in exchange for the award of public housing or other benefits. This type of corruption can lead to a lack of competition in the allocation process, as well as the potential for substandard housing or other benefits to be provided.
A further type of corruption in the allocation of public housing is known as “favoritism.” This occurs when government officials or employees award housing or other benefits to individuals or companies based on personal or political relationships, rather than on merit. This type of corruption can lead to a lack of competition in the allocation process, as well as a lack of accountability in the allocation process.
To prevent and detect corruption in the allocation of public housing, several steps can be taken. One important step is to establish and enforce strong transparency and oversight measures, such as regular audits and public reporting requirements. This can help to ensure that the allocation process is open and accountable to the public.
Another important step is to establish and enforce strong ethical standards for government officials and employees involved in the allocation process. This can help to ensure that everyone involved in the allocation process is committed to acting in the best interests of those in need of public housing.
Finally, to detect and prevent corruption, it is important to establish a strong whistle-blower protection program that encourages employees and other stakeholders to report any suspicious activity. This can help to ensure that any potential corruption is identified and dealt with quickly, before it can do significant harm to the public housing system.
In addition to the above steps, it is important to have laws and regulations in place that prohibit certain actions, such as nepotism, bribery and favoritism in the allocation of public housing. These laws and regulations should be designed to ensure that the allocation process is fair, competitive, and transparent, and that all parties involved in the process are held accountable for any corruption.
In conclusion, corruption in the allocation of public housing is a serious problem that can have significant negative effects on those in need of public housing, as well as for the overall integrity of the public housing system. By establishing and enforcing strong transparency, ethical standards, and whistle-blower protection programs, as well as having laws and regulations in place, government can help to prevent and detect corruption and protect the integrity of the public housing system. It is important for government to be vigilant in monitoring and enforcing these measures, so that the public can trust that public housing is allocated based on merit and need, rather than on personal gain.
Corruption in the allocation of public housing
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
