Cross Cultural Management Class Project Case Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Cross Cultural Management Class Project Case Assignment
There are three sections to this paper.
Assume that they are a consultant working for an American firm responsible for providing training to expatriates on international assignments. Prepare a training package that would be used to provide expatriates with a foundation for living and working in the country. Draw on available online library research (and include proper citation and references) and may also supplement with interviews with managers who have lived or worked in this country.
The report should include:
- A cultural analysis: The cultural roots of a country are reflected in the arts, literature, and mass media of that society. Select one form of art, literature, or mass media to understand the culture of that country. Describe specific examples of this aspect of the culture, then identify the underlying beliefs and values reflected in these examples. Discuss the similarities and differences between American culture and the culture of the country you choose. Do not focus only on history or geography, but also on cultural beliefs, values, and norms.
- A description of the current practices that American firms use to train professionals for assignments in your country of choice. You can use online LIRN library research, supplemented with interviews.
- A PowerPoint presentation on living and working in your country of choice.
Note: The Project will be 7 pages, 6 pages of the subject and a Reference Page in APA Format.
A PowerPoint presentation will be 4 slides long, on living and working in your country of choice.
Running head: HIPAA SECURITY AND PRIVACY RULES 1
HIPAA SECURITY AND PRIVACY RULES 4
HIPAA security and privacy rules
Medical Law and Ethics
HIPAA violations are a main concern in healthcare industry, and its fulfillment is one of the most significant factors to a health organization’s achievement. The HIPAA Security and Privacy rules were made to guarantee personal health information of a patient is kept secure and private. Enforcing the Privacy and Security laws process
requires the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), which uses three methods to guarantee that the healthcare professionals comply with the rules. To begin with, all the complaints are assessed through a thorough investigation process (Stephen, 2003).
When the compliant has been acknowledged for investigation the healthcare provider and the submitting party shall be contacted, where more details shall be composed and assessed.
By law, any specialized health care concerned with violations claim is mandatory to oblige with the investigations. Most HIPAA violations complains are resolved and closed after finding out that covered entity was operating in compliance of the laws. Another method is by reaching out to the enclosed entities and offering training and
education to assist in fostering of full accepting and complying with the requirements of the laws. In cases where noncompliance is detected, ruling can be made through a voluntary compliance, instantaneous corrective act, or conformity upon a ruling (Stephen, 2003).
The OCR can partner with the Department of Justice to work jointly on creating potential criminal charges. When resolution method has been recognized, and the health care expert does not meet the necessities as well as comply with it, a sudden fine can be issued.
The OCR moderates fulfillment with comprehensive reviews of enclosed entities to guarantee that they are working in compliance with the law. An example of a HIPAA violation and how it impacts one as a health care professional is viewed between prestige and a client.
A pharmacist at Prestige health care where I work gave medicine to his neighbor and noticed that the neighbor had been diagnosed with HIV AIDS. He went home and informed his wife who spread the rumor and when John had about it, it affected him since withdrew from him. John filed a lawsuit against Prestige and claimed it was
accountable for the HIPAA violation since it failed to train, teach and supervise its employee (Stephen, 2003). Prestige disputed that the pharmacist went beyond his job duties and was not accountable for the breach. The jury disagreed and the jury decided prestige was not accountable for the breach. The jury and the judge decide
prestige was responsible for 80% of the compensation owed to the plaintiff. Prestige has already agreed to appeal.
Health, (2013). Protecting personal health information in research: understanding the HIPAA
privacy rule (03-5388). Retrieved from website: http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/pdf/HIPAA_Privacy_Rule_Booklet.pdf
Cross Cultural Management Class Project Case Assignment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.