Deforestation in Ghana and Ivory Coast Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Deforestation in Ghana and Ivory Coast Essay
For this week’s Shared Practice, reflect on your own professional experiences and search reputable news sources on the internet to find an example in the news where managers and employees at a company fell short of doing the “right thing.” Consider the circumstances that surrounded the example and whether it makes the person or organization ‘bad’?
With these thoughts in mind:
Part 1 (300 words or more)
Post a response to the following:
Describe a case you have experienced or a story within the last three years that you have found through a reputable news source, where the manager(s) of a company did not act ethically or align their conduct with laws and regulations. Discuss the consequences that occurred, or might occur, as a result.
Hint: Your answer should address who was affected and what happened to the reputation of the organization or the individual(s) involved in the situation.
Explain actions would you take if you knew management at your organization was not aligning its actions to the valued and policies of the organization, or worse, to the law. Discuss how would you proceed, and the concerns might you have.
Hint: In your answer, be sure to consider seriously the obstacles you might confront. Your actions might put friends and colleagues in legal trouble, your own job might be at risk, and “whistle-blowers” often face severe backlash. Your answer should account for these challenges.
Part 2 (250 words for each Colleague)
Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.
Respond to two or more of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:
Share with a colleague an insight you have gained about the importance of a manager being aware of the legal and ethical risks that may occur in the work environment. Share whether you think such awareness could have avoided the ethical dilemma posted by your colleague.
Share with a colleague some specific resources you know of that can assist managers in the situation described in his or her original post. Discuss how to access or utilize resources, such as, human resources managers, legal/regulatory departments, or outside assistance.
1st Colleague to respond to:
Nestle has been under heat for decades with ethical allegations. More recently in 2017, there was an investigation into industry practices supporting the deforestation in Ghana and Ivory Coast. It was found that the cocoa beans traders were selling to Nestle were being grown in protected regions illegally (Maclean, 2017). This support of resources is adding to detrimental deforestation in West Africa. When confronted about buying from these illegal cocoa traders, Nestle did not deny their involvement. Instead, they stated they have pledged to work hard to remove these beans from their products (Maclean, 2017), but so far there has been no confirmation of efforts to verify/certify sourcing of legally cocoa beans being used.
For some, there is no surprise that Nestle has not been ethically sound on this issue, as there has been admittance to slave labor and other human rights issues within their plantations across the world (Hodal, 2016). For one, the future of the West African rainforest is continuing to look grim, and the farmers are not even benefiting from their crops. Because of the deforestation, it is becoming harder to find placers safe to grow and the local industry will not be able to keep up. This ethical situation seems to just promise those who are concerned that commitment will happen to only source from certified growers, but it is not happening fast enough. The rainforest is still dwindling away at the profit of larger companies for chocolate distribution. The main consequence of continuing to buy from illegal traders is complete and utter deforestation. Once the rainforest is lost, there is no rebuilding!
Going into college, I would be a bit withdrawn to confront issues that were seen to be beyond my control. Ten years later, I am in a completely different place in my life where I would take a stand against something I feel is not reflecting the organization in a positive manner. I would need to gather notations of observance and evidence of what I feel is misaligned with the organizational values and policies. Once my concerns were established, I would go to the department head (if they were not the ones involved) for guidance on how to approach HR or our legal/compliance head. I am well acquainted with both individuals at our institution, so I would not find it uncomfortable to reach out to them versus someone I didn’t know. Addressing the issues I feel that are misrepresenting the organization shows a refreshed intention of reminding the company managers to remember what the organization values itself as and what they came together to accomplish in the first place (Duska, 2004). Obviously, my main concern would be the backfire should the individual I approach fumingly disagrees or is part of the unethical situation. I know there are laws set up against that feared rebellion, but I would still prefer to connect with a higher up before moving forward with an accusation of unethical management. Having someone be aware of the movement I look to challenge is important for having my back looked out for, but also potentially dangerous for others. By jumping in fully prepared this way, I feel that I would have the support to countersuit any job security threats or putting others in the way.
Duska, R. F. (2004). Six cures for current ethical breakdowns. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 58(3), 23–26.
Hodal, K. (2016). Nestlé admits slave labour risk on Brazil coffee plantations. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/mar/02/nestle-admits-slave-labour-risk-on-brazil-coffee-plantations
Maclean, R. (2017). Chocolate industry drives rainforest disaster in Ivory Coast. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/13/chocolate-industry-drives-rainforest-disaster-in-ivory-coast
2nd Colleague to respond to:
The case study that I looked into is the Enron scandal. Enron Corporation was an American energy, commodities, and services company based in Houston, Texas. Before its bankruptcy on December 2, 2001, Enron employed approximately 20,000 staff and was one of the world ‘s leading electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion in 2000. Ghosh states “At the end of 2001, it was revealed that its reported financial condition was sustained substantially by institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting fraud, known as the Enron scandal.”The shareholders of this company lost $74 billion and the employees lost their jobs and billions in pension. Executives were involved in this fraud. By December 31, 2000, Enron’s stock was priced at $83.13 and its market capitalization exceeded $60 billion, 70 times earnings and six times book value, an indication of the stock market’s high expectations about its future prospects. In addition, Enron was rated the most innovative large company in America in Fortune ‘s Most Admired Companies. In addition, its complex business model and unethical practices required that the company use accounting limitations to misrepresent earnings and modify the balance sheet to indicate favorable performance.
Enron’s plunge occurred after it was revealed that much of its profits and revenue were the result of deals with special purpose entities. The result was that many of Enron’s debts and losses that the company suffered were not reported in the financial statements. Enron had created offshore entities that were being used for planning and avoiding taxes, which in turn raised the profitability of the business. The executives and insiders at Enron faced an ethical dilemma because they knew about the offshore accounts that were hiding losses for the company. However, the investors knew nothing of the fraudulent practices. The combination of these issues later resulted in the bankruptcy of the company. In this, particular dilemma and whether or not it is ethically wrong takes time and critical thinking. The accountants of Enron could have avoided this situation by stepping in and explaining to their superiors the cost of the long-term consequences compared to the short-term benefits was not worth what they were putting out on the line.
If I knew management at the organization where I work was not aligning its actions to the values and policies of the organization, or worse even the law. Admin. (2013) notes, “In many organizations, managers behave badly, negatively affecting employees and the workplace environment, and putting their companies at risk. Bad management behavior can range from minor to major offenses but can be destructive, eventually chase away great employees, and sometimes even cause a lawsuit.” In situations like this, I would have to report the incident to persons that are higher than myself so that the company can avoid open shame and the risk of avoiding its employees from being placed under investigation. I believe that office policy is to be followed by all employees and this will help in the growth of a company. Something that I have learned is to always make documentations, so I would have my documentation before I address all concerns.
Admin. (2013, November 4). What to Do When Managers Behave Badly. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://www.yourerc.com/blog/post/what-to-do-when-managers-behave-badly.
Ghosh, T. (n.d.). Enron Corporation: A Case Study. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://www.academia.edu/28328128/Enron_Corporation_A_Case_Study.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.