Developing Resiliency from Crisis Critique Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Developing Resiliency from Crisis Critique Assignment
Review the case study provided. Write a paper of at least 750 words (not including title page, abstract, and reference page) in current APA format critiquing of the crisis in the case study. Paper content must explore the nature of the crisis presented and suggest steps for alleviating the crisis, teaching coping skills, and developing resiliency.
An additional section must assess the grieving process of the primary victim and whether he/she effectively grieved through the loss. Integration of at least 3 scholarly sources is required. Outside sources must be current (published within the last 5 years).
Case Study: Rachel was on her regular commute to work one Tuesday morning. She had dropped her two children off at school and had plans to meet her husband for lunch later that day. Everything was going well, as she looked forward to working with clients during the morning and teaching a self-care workshop for some medical staff members at the local hospital that afternoon.
She was turning left in to her counseling practice when out of nowhere a truck hit the passenger side of her car, causing her to be thrown from the vehicle. A person at the business across the street witnessed the accident and immediately called 911 to inform them help was needed for Rachel and for the man driving the truck. Neither of them seemed to be moving on first glance.
Paramedics arrived on the scene a few minutes later, one person assessing the man and one person assessing Rachel. The man appeared to be badly bruised and may have a broken arm, so was transported to the hospital. Rachel, however, was in serious condition and at least had a broken leg. She was rushed to the hospital and assessed while her husband was notified of the accident.
Rachel woke up in a hospital room, her husband sitting by her bed, and a nurse assessing her vital signs. She was hooked to monitors and cords, and realized she had little feeling in her legs. The nurse gently oriented her to the situation and where she was, which she was appreciative of. She smiled and nodded her head, but didn’t speak. Her husband was asking if she was okay, what he could do, wondered how she was feeling, but she couldn’t answer any questions. She barely remembered what happened.
Weeks passed and Rachel remained in the hospital, eventually regaining some memory of what happened in her accident that day. She began physical therapy for her legs, as both were broken in the accident. Day after day she told herself she had what it took to get through this.
After all, she had a strong support system and her training in counseling gave her the resources she needed to deal with this horrible thing that had happened to her. Some days, however, none of this was enough.
She battled depression and anger, knowing the man who was responsible for this was already back to work, living his life. He didn’t have to suddenly close his counseling practice he worked so hard for, didn’t have to find someone else to help care for her children when she couldn’t be there and her husband was working to stay ahead of medical bills.
He didn’t have to attend physical therapy and endure such pain every day, just to be able to walk again. Rachel met with her pastor weekly, but didn’t know if she should be honest about the struggle she was feeling. She wanted to prove to herself and to her family that she had what it took to get through this.
Deep down, she really questioned whether she did, and whether her family would still stand by her if they eventually found out how she was really feeling. Maybe they wouldn’t have to…maybe it would just get better…someday.
Developing Resiliency from Crisis Critique Assignment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.