Discourse, Authority and Research Exertion Writing Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Discourse, Authority and Research Exertion Writing EssayWord Count: 200 to 400 wordsInstructions: Using any of our assigned readings since Minor Essay I, I want you to write an extended definition of one of the following terms:DiscourseAuthorityResearchPlease make sure to select only one of those terms. You must include at least one direct quotation from our source material. In addition to defining the term, I want you to consider the application of this term outside of Composition I. In other words, how will understanding your selected concept help me in coursework aside from ENC1101?Your response must be between 200 to 400 words. This assignment must be submitted as a Microsoft Word Document (.doc or .docx file type). If you submit using a different format, you will be asked to submit the assignment again.RubricMinor Essay RubricMinor Essay RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment of PurposeYour essay needs to establish a clear purpose to the writing, providing a clear introduction that offers context to the writing, consideration of exigency, and development of a focused thesis related to the assignment prompt.10.0 to >8.5 ptsExemplaryContains a clear thesis that is relevant to the prompt and provides purpose and reasoning. Provides a clear context to the overall goals of writing this essay — this context is relevant to the selected thesis, rather than just repeating the assignment prompt.8.5 to >7.5 ptsProficientProvides a clear thesis with purpose and reasoning. Context present, but only repeats the assignment prompt.7.5 to >6.5 ptsSatisfactoryProvides a clear thesis with purpose and reasoning. Lacks context.6.5 to >4.5 ptsDevelopingProvides an unclear thesis, or thesis is not relevant to the overall goals of the assignment4.5 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThesis is completely confusing. Alternatively, answer is irrelevant to the assigned question.0.0 ptsMissing, or UnacceptablePurpose is not appropriate to the assignment, or the purpose is missing.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of ReasoningSupporting details should explain why you have accepted certain ideas to be true — there should be a clear establishment of why you think the way you think, and elaboration on how an outsider might understand your thinking (which may include illustrations of your points through clear, self-created examples)10.0 to >8.5 ptsExemplaryIdeas are fully developed and connected to thesis — both explains and illustrates idea to audience, making it clear and understandable.8.5 to >7.5 ptsProficientIdeas are mostly developed, and mostly connected to thesis — provides explanation and illustration of points, even if they are somewhat muddled.7.5 to >6.5 ptsSatisfactoryIdeas are connected to thesis — provides at least an explanation or illustration of points, but may be missing one or the other.6.5 to >4.5 ptsDevelopingIdeas are not relevant to the thesis, or make little sense. No clear explanation of thinking or illustration of point present.4.5 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementSimply summarizes source material — no effort made to answer question posed in prompt.0.0 ptsMissing, or UnacceptableReasoning is not present, or is so confusing that it only evokes confusion in the audience.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation of EvidenceSource material has been synthesized into your point — the source material is used to help clarify the origin of your point, or to help give precedence to your reasoning.10.0 to >8.5 ptsExemplaryClear and correct synthesis of source material. Reasoning is backed up with source material. Uses appropriate documentation methods.8.5 to >7.5 ptsProficientPresents source material that backs up source material, but may lack clear explanation of how source material supports reasoning. There may be some issues with documentation, but at minimum contains a signal phrase and quotation marks.7.5 to >6.5 ptsSatisfactorySource material present and relevant to thesis; however, there are clear errors in documentation or synthesis of material.6.5 to >4.5 ptsDevelopingSource material is irrelevant to thesis, or inadequate to defend reasoning. Little to no effort made to properly document material. May only summarize the material, rather than providing a direct quotation.4.5 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementEvidence provided is not used correctly (misinterpreted or misquoted).0.0 ptsMissing, or UnacceptableFails to provide evidence, or evidence is not one of the assigned sources.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection of PurposeBy the end of the essay, you should take time to reflect on the significance of your ideas — why do you think your ideas will matter to your audience, or what actions do you think your audience should take now that they understand your purpose?10.0 to >8.5 ptsExemplaryFinal conclusion explains relevancy of ideas to audience, and offers either a reflection on the significance of the ideas presented, or provides a final call to action to the audience.8.5 to >7.5 ptsProficientFinal conclusion attempts to explain relevancy of ideas to audience, but may not adequately elaborate on that significance.7.5 to >6.5 ptsSatisfactoryFinal conclusion provides a weak explanation of the relevancy of the ideas to the audience.6.5 to >4.5 ptsDevelopingFinal conclusion simply restates the main ideas of the essay.4.5 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementConclusion is irrelevant to the thesis provided.0.0 ptsMissing, or UnacceptableConclusion missing.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of Revision, Editing, and FormatThis is still an essay — there should be signs that you reviewed the material, revised for style and ease of reading, edited for grammatical issues, and formatted the essay to conform to MLA guidelines.10.0 to >8.5 ptsExemplaryEssay shows clear signs of revision — material is polished and contains almost no errors.8.5 to >7.5 ptsProficientEssay mostly revised, though could use some polish for either grammar, sentence structure, style, or MLA format.7.5 to >6.5 ptsSatisfactoryEssay needs some revision — there are clear errors in either sentence structure, grammar, style choices, or MLA format.6.5 to >4.5 ptsDevelopingLimited signs of revision — there are significant errors in either sentence structure, style choices, grammar or MLA format. Begins to hinder the readability of the essay.4.5 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementErrors are significant, and prevent readability of material.0.0 ptsUnacceptableEssay cannot be understood in current condition.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.