- Expert Academic and Article Professional Writing Service
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaysolver.com
Effective Leadership Critical Tool in a Corporate Environment Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Effective Leadership Critical Tool in a Corporate Environment Essay
Description/Paper Instructions
Effective Leadership Critical Tool in a Corporate Environment Essay
Top of Form
Effective leadership is a critical tool in a corporate environment. However, some leaders have inadequate leadership skills that interfere with their performance, interfering with the performance of their corporations—the case of Marissa Mayer, a leader who served at Yahoo suits this context.
Mayer was a former employee at Google before she secured a position as the CEO with Yahoo to restore the status of the ailing corporation (Carson, 2015). Employees and other executives had great hope in Mayer, with the perception with her enigmatic figure and previous experiences at Google.
However, her arrival was a disappointment, to a greater extent, as she failed to implement change in the company, contrary to the expectations of senior executives. Mayer was a total disgrace to the entire company, Yahoo. The company had a grand vision of changing its consumer’s experiences through the internet and developing an excellent brand image, to effectively maneuver in a competitive environment with other companies, including Google (Myatt, 2015).
Mayer exemplified a sophisticated leadership style, coupled with biased approaches. Although a leader should exemplify excellent listening skills, Mayer was obsessed with listening, other than engaging in constructive discussions with other executives on how to turn around the company. Her decision-making processes were flawed; she could devise solutions to challenges affecting the company without critically analyzing the problem.
One and a half years after her arrival, employees were beginning to revolt her leadership strategies. On one occasion, she read a book meant to educate young children to her employees, who were angry concerning her leadership (Carson, 2015). Things were getting out of track.
Mayer had failed to create a conducive environment for her employees; there was inadequate trust between her and other executives. Trust in different constituencies in a corporate environment is critical. Mayor also steered the developed a toxic corporate culture, which is an indicator of an incompetent leader.
She made attempts to transform and amend a culture she never understood, the greatest failure of a CEO who is expected to steer an international company. Corporate culture is a critical tool that shifts a corporation’s position in the global scale, develops and stabilizes an excellent momentum.
In her transformation procedure, Mayer adopted multiple strategies without focusing on a single approach for an effective turnaround. Initially, Mayer had a variety of excellent strategy, however, the implementation phase was inconsistent, creating more trouble than good.
Her change strategy consisted of a variety of initiatives, ranging from acquisitions to novel technologies (Myatt, 2015). Acquisitions are effective in restoring a corporation, but for Mayor, they did not work in either way. During her tenure, Mayer signed acquisitions with fifty-one different companies, which led to the closure of forty-one, others reported huge losses, including Tumblr. Indeed, several approaches could have been integrated into the company for an excellent turnaround.
I disagree with Mayer’s decision and initiatives to implement change at Yahoo. An excellent leader should focus on establishing outstanding efforts to promote corporate success. For Mayer, creating a good rapport with other executives, developing a vision, and sharing ideas could have been an excellent strategy.
Establishing excellent attachments in an organization builds trust and necessitates the achievement of corporate goals. As a leader, being well-versed with cultural aspects of an organization is crucial before engaging in a transformation process, Mayer should have followed a similar strategy.
Also understanding the fragility of a corporate culture in the corporate’s ecosystem is crucial. Lastly, having unified strategies, other than focusing on scattered strategies is essential in an attempt to promote organizational success; here, Mayer could have focused on one initiative other than integrating multiple approaches simultaneously.
References
Carlson, N. (2015). Marissa Mayer and the fight to save Yahoo! Hachette UK.
Myatt, M. (2015, December 13). Marissa Mayer: A case study in poor leadership. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikemyatt/2015/11/20/marissa-mayer-case-study-in-poor-leadership/#3d2ffdd73b46
Top of Form
The modern world of business is made up of intricate connections built on technology, global connectivity and strong organizational cultures. Researchers in both academia and practice argue that culture is a concept that is much-studied and talked about but seldom understood (Rajiv, 2019).
The centrality of culture in business performance is a critical factor to consider when planning ahead and performing such important duties as selecting an organization’s CEO. It is important to point out that not all highly talented managers and leaders are CEO-ready.
In any organization’s quest for success and superior performance, the CEO is a critical factor because they not only create the vision but also lead the team of employees toward its attainment. This post briefly and precisely discusses the case of corporate failure at Yahoo! Under the leadership of Marissa Mayer due to culture-related challenges.
As a newly seated CEO, one of the most critical things that one needs to do first is to build trust and confidence across all constituencies, but more especially with the workforce (Rajiv, 2019). From a global leadership viewpoint, a CEO should create firm relationships with the members of the workforce because the employee is the life and blood of the organizations.
The extent to which an organization can achieve high levels of innovation and creativity is directly connected to their ability to contribute in the decision making process. Mayer went against this best practice and opted to speak more than she was willing to listen to the people she was leading (Myatt, 2015).
She aimed at making everyone follow her example as she could work 130 hours a week. This resulted in lower levels of satisfaction because with the long working hours came the indefinite suspension of the work-from home program and the alteration of scheduling which affected the unlimited vacations.
What Mayer did was to want to make Yahoo another Google by overhauling the culture and introducing a new, seemingly fast-paced culture. Global best practice indicates that the most appropriate thing to do is to first understand the culture of the new workplace for CEOs like Mayer (Zucker, 2019).
She did not take time to understand her workers, something that saw numerous business magazines and online platforms term her the most disliked CEO in the US. Mayer did not recognize the fact that culture is the glue that cements all the business functions together.
Failing to understand the culture of the organization creates a toxic climate, which inhibits the employees’ ability and willingness to contribute. An organizational culture is a delicate ecosystem made up of multiple components, which, if not properly handled, could easily disentangle very fast.
Mayer constantly disempowered the employees by not allowing them to make mistakes. Global leadership best practices suggest that a good CEO is one that considers the employees more than themselves, and that all employees should be allowed to make mistakes. Mayer was about listening to herself and wanting everyone else to follow her options (Myatt, 2015).
With such a toxic climate, the employees stop offering their insights and suggestions, some of which could steer the organization toward the achievement of its goals and ultimately its vision. In addition to violating the culture at Yahoo! Mayer failed to work with a clearly articulated strategy, instead opting to go for acquisitions, with the hope of new people coming in with new solutions.
If I were in her position, I could have done things totally differently by allowing the culture of Yahoo to thrive and by involving the employees at every point of the decision making process. I could have acknowledged the centrality of unlearning because Mayer did not want to unlearn; instead, she preferred to force her approach on the employees.
I could have chosen more intricate strategies and adopted a better execution method. I could have been more open-minded because Mayer’s close-mindedness played a role in hurting the culture of Yahoo, one that supported work-life balance.
References
Myatt, M. (2015). Marissa Mayer: A Case Study in Poor Leadership. Forbes Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikemyatt/2015/11/20/marissa-mayer-case-study-in-poor-leadership/#662036793b46
Rajiv, A. (2019). Turnaround Management: An Explorative Investigation of the Strategic Leadership Competencies for the Turnaround of Indian IT Firms (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland).
Zucker, R. (2019). Why Highly Efficient Leaders Fail. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2019/02/why-highly-efficient-leaders-fail
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Effective Leadership Critical Tool in a Corporate Environment Essay
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
