- Expert Academic and Article Professional Writing Service
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaysolver.com
Employee Voice Discussion Post Assignment
Employee Voice Discussion Post Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Employee Voice Discussion Post Assignment
- What data would you gather about your organization (or large department or division) to accurately evaluate its organizational climate?
To accurately assess the climate of my organization, I would assess the corporate culture, the commitment of employees, evaluate communication, and asses the perception of ethics within the division (CHRM, n.d). I would also like to gauge if there is a potential turnover problem, find ways to improve the organization, and attempt to determine if employees are happy.
- How would you collect that data?
Anonymously through an online survey. I have seen many surveys throughout my career and most of them are flooded with redundant, but mandatory questions. These questions must be answered to progress or submit the survey. I believe this lowers participation giving less data to analyze.
- How often would you collect data and analyze it?
Frequency is another factor that could deter someone from taking a survey. If it offered too frequently, the employee could question if their input matters and become fatigued. Surveys should be conducted when a senior leader changes in the organization or a merger.
According to Marritt (2017) employees may be asked the same question every quarter. I believe it depends on the number of questions in a survey and what data is trying to be obtained. If the survey is short, quarterly should be fine. If the survey takes forty minutes to complete, quarterly may be too frequently.
- How would you analyze it?
I believe analyzing the commitment would be one of the best factors to understand the climate of an organization. According to Meyer, Stanley, & Parfyonova (2012), there are three types of commitment to an organization.
The first is affective commitment or the emotional desire to remain attached to the company. The second is normative commitment or sense of obligation to stay. The last is continuance commitment; the cost of leaving. I believe pulling data in this manner could really shed light on how committed employees are.
- What is an example of an HRM action that might result based on data gathered?
The first thing that comes to mind during a survey is the potential removal or change in leadership. However, there are other actions we can track through survey data. Surveys can ask employees how long they plan on remaining with the organization also allow employees to be heard and positively influenced. (Miller, 2018).
- What are your experiences with evaluating organizational climate as an administrator or as part of a work group?
As a previous acting First Sergeant, I assisted the commander with administering the DEOMI Equal Opportunity Climate Survey (DEOCS). The objective of this survey is to enhance commander accountability, address issues of equal opportunity, improve effectiveness in the organization, and provide a uniform assessment across all Services & DoD components.
The survey results are forwarded to the commander’s immediate supervisor, the survey was done annually or withing 120 days of assuming command, and out of cycle request for additional surveys are not authorized (DEOCS Information, n.d.).
References
CHRM. (n.d.) What is the organizational climate assessment ad how is it down? Retrieved from https://www.chrmglobal.com/Qanda/73/1/What-is-organizational-climate-assessment-and-how-is-it-done-.html
DEOCS Information. (n.d.). Unit climate assessment/DEOCS. Retrieved from https://www.hanscom.af.mil/Portals/57/documents/eo/AFD-141125-006.pdf?ver=2016-07-07-110320-487
Marritt, A. (2017, January 29). How frequently should you survey employees? Retrieved from https://www.organizationview.com/insights-articles/2018/5/27/how-frequently-should-you-survey-employees
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 1-16. Retrieved from Science Direct in the Trident Online Library.
Miller, B. (2018, April 09). Pros and cons of employee engagement surveys. Retrieved from https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/2018/04/09/pros-cons-employee-engagement-surveys/
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Employee Voice Discussion Post Assignment
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
