Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Please respond to the eight questions below:1)
What is the definition of globalization?
2)Explain what a current account deficit is and why the international community is concerned about a country’s current account deficit.
3)Explain the function of the Bretton Woods institutions in globalization (IMF, World Bank, and GATT/WTO). Take note of the Bretton Woods institutions’ positive and bad repercussions.
4)What impact has globalization had on social movements?
5) Describe the hegemonic stability hypothesis and the hegemon’s role(s) in the global arena. Then, in terms of the likelihood of interstate war, explain whether hegemonic stability theory reflects contemporary trends in international relations.
6) In the contemporary “global era,” how has the character of conflict changed?
7) Explain the confluence and influence of globalization and New Nationalism in the article “The Future of New Nationalism.pdf download.” Make sure you explain whether “New Nationalism” is indeed new, and if it is, what makes it such.
8)Explain how the United Nations’ declaration on cyber security epitomizes (or does not) the nature of the relationship between the state and the UN in terms of governance and international law by analyzing the declaration.
The UN Working Group on Cybercrime is still in session (March 2021)
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are having an impact on all three pillars of the UN’s work: peace and security, human rights, and sustainable development.
In the ICT environment, the importance of establishing and maintaining international peace, security, collaboration, and trust has never been more evident.
ICT skills are being developed by states for military purposes.
The employment of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in future inter-state conflicts is becoming increasingly likely.
ICT capabilities are used by both state and non-state entities, including terrorists and criminal organizations.
States also concluded that ICT activity that intentionally damages critical infrastructure or otherwise impairs the use and operation of critical infrastructure to provide services to the public, in violation of international law, could pose a threat not only to security but also to state sovereignty, economic development and livelihoods, and, ultimately, the safety and well-being of the public.
Reaffirmation of States:
International law, particularly the United Nations Charter, is applicable and necessary.
Negotiation, inquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and judicial resolution are all peaceful methods for resolving problems.
States should avoid and desist from taking any actions that are contrary to international law, particularly the United Nations Charter.
More shared understandings of how international law applies to state use of ICTs are needed. Adopt:
The need for voluntary, non-binding norms of responsible State behavior to reduce threats to international peace, security, and stability because norms play an essential role in strengthening predictability and minimizing the danger of misperceptions, thereby contributing to conflict prevention.
States underlined that standards do not replace or modify enforceable international responsibilities or rights but rather provide particular extra guidance on what constitutes responsible state action in the use of it. Norms do not seek to restrict or prohibit behavior that is otherwise legal under international law.
States must take reasonable measures to protect the supply chain’s integrity, including the creation of objective cooperative measures.
Attempt to prevent the spread of hazardous ICT tools and techniques, as well as the usage of potentially harmful hidden functions.
Vulnerabilities must be reported responsibly.
States should not engage in or knowingly support ICT activity that purposefully damages critical infrastructure or affects the usage and functioning of critical infrastructure to provide public services in violation of their international commitments.
Exchanging views among States and highlighting specific themes of international law for further in-depth discussion within the United Nations are required to deepen common understandings on the applicability of international law.
Establish confidence-building measures (CBMs), which include transparency, cooperation, and stability measures aimed at preventing conflicts, reducing tensions, and avoiding misperceptions and misunderstandings.
Maintain national and regional systems and institutions, as well as the development of sufficient resources and capabilities, such as national Computer Emergency Response Teams (CERTs),
Each country must improve its ability to plan for and respond to cyber threats.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.