Factors Leading To High Cases of Healthcare-Acquired Infection
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Factors Leading To High Cases of Healthcare-Acquired Infection
INFECTION PREVENTION 1
INFECTION PREVENTION 15
Phase # 3 Implementation
Task Duration Assessment of the current practices 1 week Identification of the factors leading to high cases of healthcare-acquired infection 5 weeks Pre-Training Two weeks Training 5 weeks Process of assessing the situation and communication with the key stakeholders Ongoing process
The implementation plan process of this research project is aimed at addressing issues related to the knowledge, practices, and other factors such as the socio-demographic factors, and the healthcare facility factors which are considered to be playing important roles towards the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. The implementation process for the change implementation plan in reducing the healthcare-acquired infections requires adequate resources which will be necessary towards training the healthcare providers to have the required knowledge needed to improve their skills in relation to the prevention of the healthcare-acquired infections. Resources will also be important in ensuring that the required tools or equipment are purchased to help in ensuring that their effective control or preventive measures in place.
Some of the important tools or equipment which will be necessary to be purchased includes the gloves, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol disinfectant, sterilizer machine, and the alcohol hand disinfectant. Other resources or tools required include pens and notebooks which will be important when training the staffs on the safety measures in relation to the process of preventing healthcare-acquired infections. The implementation program towards the reduction of the healthcare-acquired infection will be based on stages.
The first stage will be involving the process of assessing the current practices in place which are being used towards a reduction of the infection rates. This stage will also involve the assessment of the knowledge of the healthcare providers especially nurses regarding the techniques and the effective methods being used to help in the reduction of infections in the facility. The assessment will also involve looking at some of the steps which have been put in place to help in combating the incidences of the prevention rates within the facility. One-week duration will be enough towards ensuring that there is a complete assessment of the areas which requires improvement.
The second stage will involve the identification of some of the factors which are contributing to the spread of the infection rate within the facility to help in the designing of the effective training approaches which meets the gaps within the facility in relation to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. This stage will be taking around 5 days for completion.
The third stage of the implementation process the pre-training which will take about two weeks. This stage will involve the assessment of the tools and then scheduled for the training sessions (in-person training).
The fourth stage will involve the training process whereby there will be a performance of the in-person training sessions towards quality healthcare improvement. Training webinars will be checked in this stage. There will also be a collection of the baseline information; making completion of the implementation preparedness checklist. This stage will take around five weeks.
The next stage will be a continuous bi-weekly gathering to make a continuous assessment of the situation. There will be an updating of the action plans as well as the implementation of the checklist. The last stage will be involving a contours process whereby activities such as continuous weekly meeting will be important to help in determining the challenges being faced as well as the areas which are successful. In this stage, there will be the determination of the successful intervals for the healthcare providers. Frequent collection and analysis of the data regarding the practices towards preventing healthcare-acquired infections will be analyzed.
There will be a review of relevant supplementary learning network webinars. There will also be a pilot like interventions through the selection of specific departments or wards which are usually having a continuous flow of patients to help in giving a clear picture regarding the effectiveness of the program. There will be continuous training of the current and new as well as the assessment of the healthcare providers with regard to how they are being affected by socio-demographic factors i.e. age, marital status, religion, ethnicity, level of education, and the work experiences and health facility factors.
There will be assigned of the responsibilities to the staffs to help in improving the implementation process aimed at reducing healthcare-acquired infections. Each healthcare provider will be assigned the responsibility with a focus on the identification of the factors which might be further increasing the rate of healthcare-acquired infections other than those which have been identified to be the major contributors.
There will be continuous communication and giving reports in relation to the prevention processes. The prevention practices of healthcare-acquired infection are only developed through having a continuous operational procedure which is involving reporting the emerging issues and areas that requires improvement; therefore, through the existence of continuous communication process, it will be possible to deal with the issue of healthcare-acquired infections as a team. Regular assessment of the progress and creating a plan to keep the process of implementation of the targeted practices to other departments within the facility will be of great value.
Communication with the key stakeholders of the healthcare facility is another important step and this has to be an ongoing process. Stakeholders, in this case, are the individuals who are directly involved or are affected by the increasing incidences of the healthcare-acquired infections. The stakeholders include patients, healthcare providers; groups providing financial support to the hospital, and the hospital management among others. There will be continuous communication and consultation with the stakeholders to help in rolling out the program as well as expanding the process of building the sustainability of the program. Stakeholders will be important in providing feedback regarding the program aimed at addressing the existing gaps in addressing issues related to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infections. The stakeholders will be helping in identifying the areas which require some form of refinement as well as giving suggestions on the new approaches of initiatives which should be applied or adopted.
Continuous cooperation, as well as collaboration with patients, will be important in ensuring that there is a success in improving the process of addressing issues related to the prevention of healthcare-acquired infection. Patients are the highly exposed individuals to healthcare-acquired infection, therefore, an effective process of educating them on how to report and stick by the instruction of the healthcare providers especially those who are placed on an isolated room will be important in helping to reduce the exposure to healthcare-acquired infections such as tuberculosis. With regard to working together with the management of the healthcare facility, the success of the program will be achieved through support from the management. The top management is key stakeholders who are the individuals who are giving go ahead with the process of making an improvement to the issue of concern. Top management will be providing the financial support needed to purchase the materials required towards making the mission of healthcare-acquired infection prevention activities possible. It cannot be possible to make an improvement to the concerns related to the infection if the management is not fully engaged since the project is doom to fail due to a lack of full support.
In order to meet the objective of full implementation of the program, it is important to have the required resources in place. These resources are the materials or the equipment which are supposed to be purchased to help in ensuring that every activity being undertaken such as the training of the staffs as well as engaging the key stakeholders i.e. healthcare providers, management, financial supporters, and the patients are effectively involved in the process of implementation. Therefore, the materials and the activity of training and communicating with the stakeholders are categorized below based on the amount required to support each activity or purchase of the materials needed.
Materials/ Activities Costs Gloves $ 300 Manila paper for designing the waste segregation protocol $ 15 More laboratory coats $ 100 Hydrogen Peroxide $ 500 Alcohol Disinfectant $ 300 Sterilizer Machine $ 800 Alcohol Hand Disinfectant $ 100 Pens and Notebooks $ 150 Construction of the isolation room $ 5000 Training of healthcare providers $ 3000 Communication with the stakeholders $ 800 Miscellaneous $ 2000 Total $ 13,065
Batran, A., Ayed, A., Salameh, B., Ayoub, M., & Fasfous, A. (2018). Are standard precautions for hospital-acquired infection among nurses in the public sector satisfactory? AMHS , 6 (2), 223-227. Desta, M., Ayenew, T., Sitotaw, N., Tegegne, N., Dires, M., & Getie, M. (2018). Knowledge, practice and associated factors of infection prevention among healthcare workers in Debre Markos referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res, 18, 465. Haque, M., Sartelli, M., McKimm, J., & Bakar, A. M. (2018). Healthcare-associated infections – an overview. Infection Drug Resist, 11, 2321-2333. Imad, F., Ayed, A., Faeda, E., & Lubna, H. (2015). Knowledge and Practice of Nursing Staff towards Infection Control Measures in the Palestinian Hospitals. ERIC, 6 (4), 79-90. Jahangir, M., Ali, M., & Riaz, M. S. (2017). Knowledge and Practices of Nurses Regarding Spread of Nosocomial Infection In government Hospitals, Lahore. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci, 16 (3), 149-153. Moyo, G. (2013). Factors influencing compliance with infection prevention standard precautions among nurses working at Mbagathi district hospital, Nairobi, Kenya. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi. Stone, P. (2017). Economic burden of healthcare-associated infections: an American perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 9 (5), 417-422. Teshager, A. F., Engeda, H. E., & Worku, W. Z. (2015). Knowledge, Practice, and Associated Factors towards Prevention of Surgical Site Infection among Nurses Working in Amhara Regional State Referral Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia. Surgery Research and Practice.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.