Give Feedback to Toulmin Analysis
| Order ID |
53563633773 |
| Type |
Essay |
| Writer Level |
Masters |
| Style |
APA |
| Sources/References |
4 |
| Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Give Feedback to Toulmin Analysis
Description
Give feedback to toulmin analysis.
For your response, create a substantive reaction to a peer’s post that engages what they have posted. What insight did they notice about the nuanced similarities and differences there are among and between the two models of argument (Toulmin Argument and Classical Argument)? You are required to have a minimum of 50 words.
Toulmin analysis #1:
Claim-. my claim was that liquids vaping can be beneficial in ways we didnt know.
Grounds- I started my grounds in my classical argument by explaining how the use of liquid vaping is harmful to the our bodys. but went on to show how it can also help us I had three main claims for my classical argument. My first claim liquid vaping is safer than other types of regular cigarettes. My second claim, Is that liquid vaping has no smell and can be smoked indoor and outdoor . My third claim is how it is beneficial to our bodys as well as it not being the healthy way.
Warrant- To back up these sources, I explained in my first claim how dangerous other types of cigarettes are compared to liquid vaping . To back up my second claim, I explained that liquid vaping sent is less then regular cigarettes. My last source stated how liquid vaping can be beneficial to our bodys by releasing a relaxing feeling that makes it less stressful on a person but in the same source I stated how it is not the healthy way of releasing stress as there are healthier ways
Backing- The argument about healthy vs. not healthy is what I believe is the backing part of my argument. It explains how the healthy way and not healthy way are competing.as we know there good things that come from it and many bad we still dont know how much bad does as studys keep happening
Qualifier- In my argument, I had a few sentences that limited the strength of my argument, which were. As studys keep on happing we are finding out that the new wave of liquid vaping is taking over the world.
Rebuttal- My counterclaim or rebuttal for my classical argument was the thought that all this time we could have invited a new way of smoking which can be harmless.as which now we are unsure of liquid vaping vs regular cigarettes.
Toulmin Analysis #2:
Backing – I have some backing that is supporting some of my warrants, without really proving the main point. Although there are a few that do not really support the warrant they tend to support the main point more. While doing the toulmin essay I will try to improve proving evidence specifically to back up my warrant. But yes I do provide some backing.
Warrant – In my classical essay I did provide warrants many times.
Grounds – In my classical argument I provide several facts for all my claims that I stated even the rebuttal. I think in my toulmin essay I could find better evidence to prove my point to the fullest potential.
Qualifier – I don’t think I provided a qualifier in my classical argument but the toulmin essay has some different criteria compared to the classical essay.
Claim – my claim that I used in my classical argument essay was Global warming is a real issue that is occurring today. I believe I could use the same claim for my toulmin essay.
Rebuttal – Now for the rebuttal that I used for my classical argumentative essay was Global warming is fake, it is nothing but phony science the government made up to hide something from the public’s eye. In my opinion, I think I should change it but I don’t know what too.
Give Feedback to Toulmin Analysis
|
RUBRIC
| QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
| Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
| Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
| Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
| Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
 GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
|
| Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
 |
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
