Gridlock in New York City Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Gridlock in New York City Case Study
Running head: CONCEPT JUSTIFICATION 1
CONCEPT JUSTIFICATION 7
The rationale for the concept
The United States has one of the most advanced transport systems in the world. However, that is not to say there are no challenges. There are many problems which the country’s transport systems still face, and there is a need for all people, all stakeholders, to contribute ideas which may help to improve the transport system. Notably, this paper focuses on the activities of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), especially with regards to the Open Gangway Subway Cars Project in New York City. New York City is one of the busiest cities in the United States, and commuters usually experience a wide range of challenges. There are times when the city witnessed some of the worst gridlocks in the county, and these occurrences usually lead to the loss of human time. Statistics suggest that gridlocks in the highways lead to the loss of productive time running into billions of dollars (Congestion Pricing, n.d).
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) sees more than 14.8 million people going through its transport system each day. That is a massive figure which is likely to cause chaos in the event where it is not properly handled. It is essential to have an understanding of the possible positive contributions which this project as well as some of the adverse effects which it may bring. In the long run, the findings may be useful in the development of changes which may help the organization. The introduction of the concept of Open Gangway Subway Cars Project is likely to play a key role in making sure that the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) improves its management of the transport systems within the New York region (Authority, 2016).
The project appears to utilize the advantages presented by emerging technologies to improve the region’s transport system. The development of new technologies makes it incredibly necessary for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to improve its traffic management (Kurzhanskiy & Varaiya, 2015). It is essential to note that most of the traffic problems which New Yorkers are facing may be addressed through the adoption of the most appropriate approaches which may address traffic snarl-ups and congestion on New York.
Fig. 1.0: Gridlock in New York City.
From the image above, it is evident that there are times when the highways of New York may experience some hugely devastating traffic congestions. The new project by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) presents an opportunity to address one of the most devastating managerial and infrastructural problems which have caused most of the traffic problems in New York. It is important to note that the development of this project is likely to lead to the realization of better management of the city’s transport system.
The idea being promoted in this case is the Open Gangway Subway Cars Project, which is aimed at addressing the transport challenges which are being experienced by the commuters in New York City. While there are many cities in the United States which are experiencing transport challenges in the United States, this project is being developed to address the unique challenges facing the New York City transport system. Since the project has been designed and tailored to meet the unique needs of the New York transport challenges, the only market available for it is the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) (MTA, 2016). It is only this organization which is mandated to manage the New York transport challenges as well as addressing the various challenges facing the region’s transport.
There are many stakeholders who are seeking to come up with ideas aimed at addressing the transport system challenges being witnessed in the country. With each passing day, different stakeholders and entrepreneurs are seeking to come up with suggestions which they think if implemented, will contribute to the development of the transport systems (Martens, 2016). However, it is important to note that there are several factor competitive aspects of the Open Gangway Subway Cars Project which gives it an edge over its rivals.
- The project is designed solely to address the unique challenges facing New York’s transport systems; unlike many institutions or stakeholders which bring ideas and projects which are aimed at addressing the many transport challenges, it is notable that the current project has been developed with sights set only on the unique transport challenges facing New York.
- The project creates space for the application of emerging technology; there is no way in which technology may be omitted from the management of modern transport challenges. One of the primary advantages of the Open Gangway Subway Cars Project is that it makes it possible to utilize the most appropriate technologies to solve the problems.
- Value for money; one of the most critical issues for consideration in the development of projects is the ability to get value for money. The meaning of this is that the benefits which are to be obtained from the implementation of the project must be greater than the costs. As the analysis of this project indicates that the benefits will most likely outweigh the costs. Most importantly, the project is not so expensive that it will be unaffordable by the organization. The utilization of appropriate technology is likely to lower the costs of the project, and that will make sure that the project funding will not have adverse effects on the finances of the organization. When looking at project funding, it is essential to make sure that the costs of funding a single project do not prevent the implementation of other projects within the organization.
There is a clear union between the Open Gangway Subway Cars Project and the mission, vision, and priorities of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). In the first case, it is essential to note that the primary responsibility of the organization is to make sure that New York City has an effective transport system. Since this project will contribute to the effectiveness of the performance of the transport system in New York, there is a clear union between the two. Additionally, in the recent past, the organization has demonstrated its desire to adopt and implement appropriate technologies in the management of the transport system in New York. Thus, in the development of infrastructural changes to improve the transport system in New York, it would be necessary to make sure that there is adequate utilization of technology. The current project utilizes appropriate technology, and that makes it be in alignment with the needs and objectives of the organization.
There are specific features which characterize innovation. Not any new idea which is being introduced is innovative. However, an old or a pre-existing idea may be used in a way which demonstrates innovation. The following is an analysis of the extent to which the project demonstrates innovation;
- The project uses a new idea to solve an existing problem; while the idea of creating an Open Gangway Subway Cars may have been around for quite some time, it has never been seen as a way through which the transport challenges in New York may be addressed. The application of this idea to solve the transport problem is innovative.
- The project will use locally available resources; innovative idea usually entails the utilization of locally available resources to address existing problems (Gault, 2018). Looking at the nature of the Open Gangway Subway Cars project, it is evident that all the resources which would be used are capable of being obtained locally. Thus, the fact that the project uses existing resources to solve existing challenges makes it innovative.
- It can be twisted and adjusted to improve the quality of the outcome; like many other innovative ideas, the Open Gangway Subway Cars project may be twisted and changed in several ways in order to make sure that there is an improvement in the outcome.
Authority, M. T. (2016). Metropolitan transportation authority.
Congestion Pricing. (n.d). $100 Billion Cost of Traffic Congestion in Metro New York. Retrieved from https://pfnyc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2018-01-Congestion-Pricing.pdf
Gault, F. (2018). Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy, 47(3), 617-622.
Kurzhanskiy, A. A., & Varaiya, P. (2015). Traffic management: An outlook. Economics of transportation, 4(3), 135-146.
Martens, K. (2016). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. Routledge.
MTA. (2016). The MTA Network: Public Transportation for the New York Region.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.