Homework for BUS3055 Operations Management
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Homework for BUS3055 Operations Management
Week 2 Discussion Issue Task: Respond to this topic during the second week of discussion. The deadline is June 11 at 12:59 a.m. Accountant’s Liabilities and Warranties
Please examine the link “Doing Discussion Questions Right,” the extended grading criteria for the forum, and any special instructions for this week’s topic before commencing work on this week’s discussion forum.
There are two components to the discussion assignment. Part 1: Choose one of the questions and respond Part 2:
Submit your Part 1 and Part 2 solutions to this Discussion Area by the due date. In one thread, post the solutions to both portions. Part 1 and Part 2 of your answers should be labeled, but do not repeat the scenario language in your responses. Begin reviewing and replying to your classmates as soon as feasible during the week. By the conclusion of the week, you should have reviewed and critiqued the work of other students using the extended rubric.
Part I of the discussion question
Choose one of the scenarios below and explain why it is the best answer. Include any ethical considerations that arise in your remarks. To back up your answer, find at least one scholarly source from the SUO Library or one case that has been decided or is now pending.
1st Scenario: Warranties
Michael, a mechanic, has a 2,000-pound machine to install in his shop. The equipment will have to be lifted to the second storey for installation. Michael goes to Home Depot and informs the manager, Brett, that he requires heavy-duty chain for his auto repair shop. Michael buys a half-ton chain after Brett recommends it. Michael tried to move the piece of equipment off the ground by wrapping the chain around it. The chain suddenly snaps. The equipment is severely damaged when it crashes to the ground. Michael discovered that the job required at least a one-ton chain. Michael initiates a lawsuit against Brett and Home Depot for breaching the implied warranty of merchantability.
Will Michael’s case be successful? Explain the various possibilities as well as the most likely outcome.
Scenario 2: Liability of the Accountant
Memphis Mini Golf and Go Carts (MMGGC) CEO Walker sought to sell the company to Go Carts, Golf & Games. Walker hired Blanchard, an accountant, to undertake an audit of MMGGC to create a foundation for the deal. Blanchard was well aware that Go Carts, Golf & Games will almost certainly rely on the audit report in deciding whether or not to buy the company from MMGGC. MMGGC’s company was profitable, according to Blanchard’s audit report. In agreeing to purchase MMGGC’s business and consenting to the terms of the transaction, William, Go Cart’s president, relied on this study. It was later discovered that the accountant had made several errors and that the business that had been sold was actually insolvent. Walker and Blanchard were sued for damages by William and Go Carts. The accountant was accused of negligently misrepresenting the facts, according to the lawsuit.
Discuss the reasons for each side, decide who should win, and back up your conclusion with legal evidence.
Discussion Part 2 of the question
Provide the following information about the business you founded in Week 1 in two to three paragraphs.
Discuss potential product liability issues and how your company might avoid these risks based on the type of product your company will sell. If your company just provides services, choose a product that your company will buy and use it to answer this question. Explain how the UCC applies to your transactions and how you plan to manage sales contracts and warranties. Explain why the UCC will not apply if your company delivers a service.
What is the difference between FOB Destination and FOB Shipment? Explain the benefits and drawbacks of each. Identify and explain the shipping term(s) you intend to use for your company.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.