Increasing Clients Muscular Power Research Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Increasing Client’s Muscular Power Research Paper
- Josh Young
For my final project, I want to focus on increasing a client’s muscular power. There will be some element of increasing strength as well, but the main focus will be on power. In addition to increasing power, I will also build into the program balance and agility training.
The three tests that I will be using are: Sahrmann core stability test (Gibson, Wanger, & Heyward, 2019) for core stability, standing long jump (Gibson, Wagner, & Heyward, 2019) for lower body power, and lastly the kneeling chest pass (Aipa, 2017) for upper body power. These tests will provide a baseline for the client’s muscular power and core stability, which is needed to generate power in the limbs.
There will be a total of five training days per week, broken down as follows:
- Day 1 – strength/power
- Day 2 – strength/power
- Day 3 – balance/agility
- Day 4 – strength/power
- Day 5 – balance/agility
Each workout session will train both upper and lower body, but more emphasis will be given to the lower body and core muscle groups, as that is where both power and balance are generated.
Based on the updated information, I have begun to narrow my differential diagnoses to swimmer’s shoulder/impingement, slap tear, rotator cuff tear.
Swimmer’s shoulder/impingement – Starkey and Brown (2015) and Tovin (2006) agree that swimmer’s shoulder, or internal impingement occur as the result of the rotator cuff tendons being compressed against the glenoid. Additionally, Starkey and Brown (2015) describe this type of impingement as “posterosuperior” (p. 667), which would fit the description of where the patient feels the pain (right on top of the glenohumeral joint to slightly posterior).
This can be the result of overuse (Starkey & Brown, 2015), and if the patient has never swam 2.4 miles before and started training to do so, then he is likely experiencing overuse through that area.
Slap tear – the area that the patient describes the pain is close to the where the labrum lies. This is the only thing that makes me think this could be the injury, as the patient reported no popping or clicking.
Rotator cuff tear – Harvard Medical School (2018) identifies repetitive reaching, such as swimming, as a mechanism to rotator cuff tears. Pain may be felt as the arm is lifted up and out and may even present itself at night (Harvard Medical School, 2018). The patient does have pain lifting his arm up and out of the water, and he did report pain at night, which makes me think that we have to consider a rotator cuff tear a possibility.
I would perform a posture assessment during the exam. If his shoulders are rounded forward, that could indicate tight chest muscles, which would alter scapular positioning, which could cause impingement-type symptoms (Cools et al., 2014). In addition to the posture assessment, I would have the patient actively abduct the arm. If there is a rotator cuff tear, then shoulder elevation and possibly lateral trunk flexion to the opposite side would be observed as compensatory movements.
- Adam Jent
After receiving the new information from our patient, I still feel as though Swimmer’s shoulder/impingement is a serious consideration for the cause of his pain. Hersh (2018) states that when dealing with a shoulder impingement, a patient is likely to have a constant pain in their arm.
This pain can be described as minor but constant according to Hersh. Additionally, Hersh characterizes this condition as having “night” pain, which also seems to coincide with our patient’s description. When we consider his training program, it is easy to see that our patient may be doing too much too soon. As Hersh further points out, shoulder impingements generally result from overuse.
After review, there are a few conditions I think we should eliminate as likely causes of our patient’s pain. The following are the conditions I would eliminate from our differential list: Torn Rotator-Cuff, Ruptured Tendon, Bone Fracture, and Dislocation. With these conditions, I do not feel our patient would continue swimming.
I am also inclined to remove SLAP as a potential cause of the patient’s pain. Cluett (2019) explains that patient’s experiencing SLAP tears often complain that the pain is “deep”. In opposition, our patient complains of a pain that is more superficial.
My new list of possible diagnosis after the new information provided is as follows:
- Shoulder Impingement/Swimmer’s Shoulder
- Upper Cross Syndrome
- Rotator Cuff Strain/Tendinopathy
In order to further determine the cause of our patient’s pain, I think we need to consider the use of imaging and undergo a barrage of range of motion and strength tests. By conducting an x-ray, we can further eliminate arthritis as a cause while also determining an impingement. Additionally, by undergoing a variety of range of motion and strength tests, we can determine if there are weaknesses or tightness located in specific areas. This would help us determine if a condition like Upper cross syndrome is possible.
- Marcus C
My original differential was shoulder impingement, rotator cuff tendinopathy, and biceps tendinopathy. With the updated information I would consider biceps tendinopathy to be less likely due to the pain felt superior and posterior on the shoulder. The two diagnoses of shoulder impingement and rotator cuff tendinopathy are still possible. I would add glenohumeral instability due to the possibility of overuse causing laxity and decreased subacromial space (Allegrucci, Whitney, & Irrgang, 1994).
According to an article by Matzkin, Suslavich, & Wes (2016), the exam should consist of a postural exam looking at the neck, thoracic spine, and scapular position. The exam should also include cervical spine and shoulder ranges of motion as well as comparing shoulder strength bilaterally.
Scapulohumeral rhythm should also be assessed due to the possibility of scapular dyskinesis (Matzkin, 2016). Some tests for impingement are Neer’s test, Hawkins Kennedy, Impingement sign (Vizniak, 2020). Some tests for rotator cuff tendinopathy are the empty can test, Codman’s arm drop, and internal rotation lag sign (Vizniak, 2020).
Some tests for glenohumeral instability are load and shift (anterior and posterior), sulcus test, Faegin’s test, relocation test, and Norwoods posterior drawer test (Vizniak, 2020). I would also go through the mechanical diagnosis and therapy shoulder and cervical exam.
There is a possibility of shoulder pain that comes from the cervical spine which can be ruled in or out with end range loading. Shoulder end range loading can also be used to classify the patient’s condition. It has been shown that even when patient’s had positive impingement and rotator cuff tests that end range loading treatments had positive results (Kidd, 2013).
- Todd S
Based on the new information that was provided for our patient’s history, I would be leaning more towards shoulder impingement, rotator cuff strain, and rotator cuff tendinopathy. Shoulder impingement would still be in my differential partially because the location of the pain can correlate with this diagnosis.
The patient also reports he is experiencing sharp pain during the front crawl. This swimming style requires a variety of movements, with a few important ones being abduction and adduction. If these movements were the cause of pain, this would correlate with shoulder impingement. Rotator cuff strain would still be in my differential because of the patient’s increase in activity.
The patient does not have a history of swimming frequently, and since he has started training for his triathlon he has increased his swimming frequency to three times per week for at least 30-60 minutes. Since the patient doesn’t have a prior history of swimming this much, this opens to the door for an increased amount of stress to be placed on these joints during the activity.
I initially was thinking bicipital tendinopathy during last week’s assignment, but I would remove that from the differential. Bicipital tendinopathy patients would complain of pain more in the anterior aspect of their shoulder, and not the superior/posterior aspects (Vizniak, 2015).
With this being said, I think tendinopathy could still be a potential diagnosis so I would agree with the differential of rotator cuff tendinopathy. This diagnosis has the potential to affect our patient due to his increase in activity and repetitive motions. As far as the exam goes, I would begin with shoulder ranges of motion.
By assessing active, passive, and resisted ranges of motion we would be able to not only pinpoint which movements are provocative, but we would also be narrow down which type of tissue was involved. Since the patient is denying radiation, neurological exams would not be required but could still be completed to effectively rule out other conditions that weren’t mentioned in the differential.
Orthopedic assessment would include tests such as Neer’s test, Hawkins-Kennedy test, empty can test, Codman drop arm test, Apley scratch test, and Yocum’s test (Vizniak, 2015). These were just a few of the orthopedic tests that could be used in this case. Positive results from the Neer’s, Hawkin-Kennedy, empty can, and Codman drop arm tests would help support the diagnosis of shoulder impingement syndrome (Vizniak, 2015).
In regards to the rotator cuff strain and tendinopathy, tests like Apley scratch test, Yocum’s test, and Codman drop arm test could be used to help with these diagnoses (Vizniak, 2015). With a rotator cuff strain it would be expected for the patient to demonstrate an increase in pain with resisted ranges of motion, indicating more of a muscular involvement (Vizniak, 2015).
Increasing Clients Muscular Power Research Paper
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.