Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Leveraging the Cloud and Open Source Technologies in Performance Testing
With the current day trend where customers’ product expectations are rapidly changing and everyone needs products that are really rich, fast and intuitive to use, the kinds of testing that are imperative are very different than a few years ago. With excellent internet bandwidth that is now available, products and applications are all scaling very well in their performance and this is something the customers are also expecting from the products they use. That said, such a fast and flawless implementation of products is not as easy as it sounds. There are a lot of challenges associated with meeting the product’s performance goals which include:
- Increasing complexity of product architecture
- Several interfaces that the product has with external systems and dependencies
- Increased user base, leading to heavy load on the system
- Performance goals undergoing a lot of change owing to competition in the market and demanding customers
- Faster time to market for product release, which shrinks available time for performance testing
- Shortage in availability of specialized testers for performance testing
- Investment in performance testing infrastructure and tools, which are often very expensive and may become obsolete soon
If you see the above list, some of them are product and user specific challenges while some are test process challenges. The key to solving the product and user specific challenges is really around developing a robust performance test strategy and adequately testing the product for its performance before release. So, what we really need to be looking at is how to address the performance testing challenges; this forms the core of our discussion below.
Performance testing has long been in existence, however it has rightfully been given a lot of thought around specialization, domain centric testing, using the right infrastructure which mimics end user environment etc. only in the recent years. As product development technology advances with use of secured protocols, rich internet applications, service oriented architecture, web services etc. developing performance testing scripts has also become more complex. No longer will a regular “record and play” tool work across a major set of products by business it support services. There are a lot of very advanced performance testing tools that are entering the market from commercial players like HP, Microsoft, IBM which are constantly being enhanced to keep pace with the changing product technology.
However, taking advantage of such tools does not come for free. These are all very expensive Commercial of the Shelf (COTS) tools, which you need to very carefully evaluate before investing. These might especially make sense for a product company to invest in, but not so much for a testing services company, because the services company is often required to use a tool that its clients have aligned their product with. On the other end of the spectrum, we have some excellent open source testing tools available for performance testing lately, which give the COTS a run for their money. A lot of companies, including product companies have started looking at such tools as good alternatives from a cost and feature standpoint, to use in their performance testing efforts.
Jmeter is one such tool which a lot of companies are leveraging in the recent years. Again talking of trade-offs here, Jmeter is an open source tool available free of cost, easy for a tester to ramp up on, but is not comprehensive in its feature set, unlike the COTS. It has quite a few limitations around its reporting capabilities, which is a very important feature in performance testing, especially when the tester is handling large volumes of data. Also, this is data that the management and business teams are going to be interested in viewing, so a performance testing tool has to certainly offer very rich reporting functions.
This is where a company can draw its balance and decide to go with using an open source tool to take advantage of what it has to offer, but also invest in building reusable intellectual property (IP) on top of it, to address the tool’s limitations. Doing so, is beneficial for all entities involved as seen below:
- Clients (Product companies)are able to get performance testing done at a cheaper cost without compromising on quality
- Vendors (Test Service companies)are able to offer good value add services to their clients, differentiate themselves in the services market amongst their competition and also offer interesting out-of-project opportunities for their employees to work on building such core IP
- Very challenging and interesting opportunities and thus good career path progression avenues are available for the employees of test services companies
Such reusable IP and frameworks often also serve as productivity enhancers – e.g. data generation, especially user data creation is quite an overhead in a performance testing effort compared to regular functional testing. If the performance testing tool that you choose does not offer good user data generation features out of the box, this is an area worth investing some time on upfront as it will save time both in the current test cycle as well as future cycles. Automating such time consuming and monotonous jobs, also frees up time for the tester to focus on more important areas such as performance benchmarking, system analysis, competitive data analysis etc. Also, to maximize the performance testing efforts, the product company should involve the performance testing team right in the early stages of product design.
This will help the performance test team work in unison with the business team to understand end user’s performance expectations from the product under development; Understanding this will help the team chalk out “measurable” performance goals for the product and help the entire product development team understand these goals on the same page. Another benefit to such early involvement is the suggestions that the performance test team can provide on the product architecture from a performance angle (e.g. it could be the number of interfaces the product has, how certain web service calls are made, threshold values that are being set, production system configuration parameters etc.) which will help reduce the number of performance bugs in the test cycle. Such interactions between the developer and tester truly help build a quality product in the limited available release time.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.