LIBOR Scandal Case Study Project Presentation

LIBOR Scandal Case Study Project Presentation

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

LIBOR Scandal Case Study Project Presentation

Individual Case Study Project

You are newly appointed as an Ethics and Compliance Officer at an established Investment Bank. Your first task is to investigate the LIBOR Scandal involving some of the largest and powerful banks in the world AND to present your findings to the Compliance Department at the Bank. Your research methodology, investigation and analysis should cover the background to the issue, the ethical dilemmas and relevant information from credible sources and be referenced using the Harvard Referencing Style. The research should cover

Coverage of the issue by philosophers and media in the past

Ethical concerns, such as bias, truth, justice, fairness, economic considerations

EDM models (Ethical Decision Making)

Stakeholder impact theories

Legal considerations

Professional considerations

Code of corporate Governance

Professional codes

Code of ethics

Opinions of experts in the field

Case Study Report (25 marks)

Prepare a detailed report analyzing the given case. Reports should be 3,500 words (excluding table of contents, bibliography, and references), double-spaced typewritten, with graphs and illustrations, if necessary. Your report must contain the following elements:

1)Background of the scandal (2 marks)

2)Triggers and Timeline of events (4 marks)

3)Consequences of scandal (4 marks)

4)Detailed literature review- analysis using philosophical theories, EDM, governance and professional codes (6 marks)

5)Key missing Governance pieces (2 marks)

6)Company’s ethical culture (2 marks)

7)Lessons to be learnt (2 marks)

8)Conclusion (3 marks)

Presentation (15 marks)

10 Microsoft PowerPoint slides covering

1)Introduction (1 mark)

2)Research Methodology (1 mark)

3)Presentation of Analysis (2 marks)

4)Presentation of Impact (2 marks)

5)Presentation of Ethical considerations (2 marks)

6)Presentation of Lessons Learnt (2 marks)

7)Content of presentation (2 marks)

8)Clarity and logical flow of content presented (1 mark)

9)Impactful use Voice in delivery (1 mark)

10)Appropriate of Gestures and Presentation Space (1 mark)

General Instructions & Format:

1) The word limit for this assignment report is 3,500 words (+/- 10%); excluding graphs and tables.

2) The assignment must be submitted on time (a soft copy to be uploaded on Turnitin submission link on My Class) to be considered for evaluation.

3) If you face any problem, please make sure to contact your lecturer before the due date.

4) You are expected to support your work with sources from the literature and use Harvard referencing style as appropriate, in text and in the list of references at the end of your assignment.

5) Format:

1. Font: Times New Roman
2. Use double spacing and sufficient margins (3-4 cm)
3. Headings & subheadings font size: 14 points; the rest of the text: 12 points
4. All pages should be numbered; include a table of content.

Grading

• The report and presentation will be marked out of 40 marks (40% of your final grade) based on the attached grading scheme. Please read the marking rubric with care as this rubric will be used for grading the report.

Academic Integrity:

• Fill in the BIBF Assignment Coversheet, scan it or capture it as a picture (to ensure that it does not affect the similarity % counted by Turnitin) and paste it in the first page of your assignment.

  Please insert your digital signature on the cover sheet of the soft copy submitted.

  By signing the coversheet and uploading your work on Turnitin, you confirm that:

– The work is your own, and that you have not copied another’s work or allowed anyone to copy your work, and that you have referenced the work of others in an appropriate way.

– You have read and understood the BIBF guidelines on Plagiarism and abided with the necessary practice

  Students who are suspected to have encountered any form of academic dishonesty will face further investigation

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.