Literature Review Assignment Three Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Literature Review Assignment Three Essay
Literature Review Assignment Three
A Literature Review is a coherent paper of literature on a given topic. It is a review of literature directly related to the topic or problem under study, followed by an explanation of how your research question grows out of that review. The purpose of the literature review is to know what others have discovered before you begin your investigation of your own, to ground your research paper.
The purpose of this assignment is to facilitate your abilities to research a topic of interest to (1) identify and formulate an inquiry question that defines what you’d like to learn, to (2) know how to search and locate literature (journal articles) using the library and scholarly internet resources, to (3) analyze information found in these articles, and to (4) synthesize new knowledge into a written literature review paper.
Complete a literature review on a particular social justice topic of your choice. Please be sure to write about any of the themes related to this course: Immigration, Systemic Racism, Mass Incarceration, Poverty, Privilege, Transgender, Gender, or Healthcare Inequities. Keep in mind you are NOT writing a research paper.
You are analyzing literature based on a research question and delving into a particular topic of your choice.
Locate at least 10 scholarly articles on your topic and write a 6 to 8-page literature review. (Six sources must be from the UM Library)
It is strongly recommended that you read the literature and establish 2 to 3 themes. Use approximately 4 articles per theme.
Steps to complete your literature review:
- Choose a topic that you are interested in studying.
- Formulate an inquiry question that specifically describes what would like to know about your topic.
- Go to the UM Library (online is fine) and search for and locate journals that include your topic’s information
- Find articles, read the abstracts and skim the articles to determine if they correspond well to your topic AND inquiry question.
- Read your articles and begin to sort and classify them by theme according to their findings (Use the Matrix it is part of the project).
- Organize your articles by sorting and classifying their findings in a meaningful way, always considering your original topic and inquiry question.
- Write your introduction then provide the lit review.
- Be sure to separate your literature by themes (subtopics) on the Matrix and submit it.
Outline for writing your literature review:
- Introduction (without a heading)
Write an introduction paragraph for your review. This paragraph
- states the topic and inquiry question for this review
- tells the reader specific background information to the issue and hand
- Literature Review (Heading)
Before you begin this section, be sure that you have sorted your articles into different themes based on the articles’ findings (sometimes called results or outcomes or perspectives). After you sort your articles, it is important to give your sorted groups a thematic name. The names of the sorted articles will become your headings for each of the sections that you write in the body of your review. The body of your literature review will include,
- Theme 1: several paragraphs that describe the first issue that you identified and compare, contrast and/or connect the articles you’ve selected in relation to that theme.
- Theme 2: several paragraphs that describe the first issue that you identified and compare, contrast and/or connect the articles you’ve selected in relation to that theme.
3 Conclusion (Provide a Heading)
This is the last paragraph of your literature review. In this paragraph, it is important to summarize the main findings from the articles that you reviewed and to point out how your inquiry questions were answered or not answered, what the gap is there if any.
This is the last page of your review. It serves as a listing of all references that you mentioned in your paper. Please make sure that only references cited in your drafts will be listed here. Please use APA style when completing this list.
- Additional Information
Remember to create an APA formatted cover page. Be sure you check your grammar usage and do not forget to synthesize your sources you are not describing the literature you are analyzing it.
The following chart will be used as a rubric to assess a small-scale literature review:
Super 100-90 Acceptable 89-80 Needs Work 79 or below Content This inquiry question was well established in a narrow context of a social justice topic. The inquiry question was established in the context of a social justice topic The inquiry question was established in the broad context of a social justice topic. At least 10 articles were selected, and each specifically related to the initial inquiry question. At least 9 articles were selected and related to the initial inquiry question. At least 8 articles were selected; some minimally related to the inquiry question. The findings/results/outcomes/perspectives of articles were thoughtfully compared, contrasted and/or connected to each other, and analyzed. The finding of articles were compared, contrasted and/or connected to each other with some analysis. The findings of articles were mentioned with little and or no comparison or connection to each other. Little analysis was provided. The conclusion of the review summarized the knowledge found from this review and related the knowledge gain to the inquiry question. The conclusion of the review summarized the knowledge found from this review. The conclusion of the review did not summarize the knowledge found from this review. The references were cited correctly using APA style The references were cited but not correctly in some areas. The references were not cited correctly. Organization The review was organized using APA headings and subheadings. The review was suitably organized considering the contents of the selected articles. The review was suitably organized considering the contents of the selected articles. Headings but no subheadings provided. The review was minimally organized, and writing was disorganized in each heading. Mechanics There were no grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors and transitional phrases were used to guide the reader throughout the text. There was an occasional grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation error that did not distract the reader. There were many grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors that distracted the reader from the content of the writing.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.