Microbiology Journal of Cellular Biochemistry task

Microbiology Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Microbiology Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

STAPH LAB REPORTS

Microbiology 311L – Fall 2017

first draft due in lab 7 & 9 November

final copy due Monday 20 November

You and your lab partner are producing and handing in a JOINT lab report for the Staph lab. You either both swim or you both sink. The format and grading scheme are described below. Realistically, you’re probably looking at 7-10 pages – maybe more.

Remember that you’re telling a story to a reader: what you did, why you did it and what you found. You’re telling the story in a way so that readers can interpret your data, come to their own conclusions, and if they want, have enough information to try and reproduce your experiments.

Please DO NOT INCLUDE the mixed Gram (+) and Gram (-) culture from the lab exercise or the PDFs of the DNA sequencing chromatograms.

TITLE and AUTHORS

• do this on a separate page – each of the other sections don’t have to start on separate pages
• come up with a descriptive title telling the reader what you did in your project
• list the names of the people who did the work – you decide on the order of the names
• Abstract: none needed for this report

INTRODUCTION

• Write some background of what is known about the Staphylococci which live on / infect humans and exist otherwise in the environment. This doesn’t need to be an exhaustive list with what they all are or do. Which ones are the big players in our normal flora / normal environment and which ones cause some of the major problems?
• Talk briefly about the idea of multi-test media and about 16S rRNA sequencing for identifying bacteria. Google 16S and you’ll hit some good information.
• Typically the last paragraph of an introduction says something like “In the present study, we attempted to…..” or “The goals of these studies were to…..” and then something like “In our studies, we found that…..”

MATERIALS AND METHODS

• Divide this section up into subheadings for each of your major techniques. Information you want to have in here includes:

– how/where you collected samples and how you plated them

– how you did Gram staining or tests like coagulase (reference these – not to my labs but to real publications!)

– which sample was inoculated into the Staph strip and how you finished the tests for the strip

– which sample was put into the PCR, how you set up the PCR reactions and how were they cycled

– how you cleaned up your DNA with the spin columns

– how you did a gel (here’s how to say it – modify it a bit for your report but this is the idea: 12 ml of each purified PCR reaction was mixed with 3 ml of 5x sample loading buffer and then run in a 1% agarose gel containing 1 mg/ml ethidium bromide in 1x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (TBE). DNA size markers (whatever we actually use) were run as standards. The gel was run at 125V in 1x TBE for approximately 45 minutes. PCR products were visualized and photographed on a UV transilluminator). “Hyperladder” is the brand name of a particular set of DNA gel size markers. We don’t use it so please just refer to them as markers

– how DNA sequence analysis was done (see lab 8)

– you can include a flow chart if it will help to explain things (call it a Figure)

– all the info for tests and molecular stuff is in your labs!

FIGURES / TABLES

• Make your figures and tables FIRST. They will be the basis for writing the rest of your paper.
• You could include any pictures (plates / Staph strips); a table of Staph strip results; a screen shot of your DNA sequence analysis; further sequence analysis (% identity etc)
• Keep the figures simple. Massive tables of numbers are a pretty sure way to loose the attention of a reader. You can use color to some extent, but remember that most journals are still in paper format and are published in black and white.
• If you show tables, make sure to provide column and row headings.
• Make sure to have a figure legend for each figure / table. Give a brief description of what the reader is seeing for each and briefly tell what was done. You can embed them in the text right next to the figure or you can put the figures and their legends in a separate section of the document.

RESULTS

• Walk the reader through your figures and make sure to refer to the figure/table numbers as you go. Assume they really don’t know much about what you did and use the results to tell them about it – think about some freshman bio major reading this, not Dr.O.
• Stick to the facts in this section but don’t interpret the findings here. That’s the purpose of your discussion. Lead the reader from one figure to the next in some logical order with some transitions between the figures in your text.
• If you didn’t get a PCR product from which to obtain DNA sequence, still show your gel (markers with sizes indicated) and just state what you were trying to do but that you didn’t get a product and so no DNA sequence is available.

DISCUSSION

• This is where you can discuss your interpretations of your results. Were your results in line with what is known at Staphylococci in general and about the particular ones you identified? Were your unknowns one that your would expect to find in the source (nose, throat, cell phone etc) you got them from? If not, why not???
• Here’s a good place to talk about some reasons why you might not have gotten a PCR product but what information you could have gotten from it (ie how does 16S rRNA sequence allow you to determine genus/species?)
• Often, the first paragraph describes again what you were trying to do and an overview of what you found.

REFERENCES / LITERATURE CITED

• You need to have at least 5 references IN ADDITION TO the textbook.
• ONLY 2 WEBSITES CAN BE CITED as sources!
• WIKI is NOT an acceptable reference for a lab report. It is, however, a good place to get started for some basic information. Google Scholar and PubMed are great places to look for real published information.
• Each scientific journal can have its own format for references. Let’s all use this one from the Journal of Cellular Biochemistry for citations from journals:

Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, Barone LM, Wilming L, Tassinari MS, Kennedy MB, Pockwinse S, Lian JB, Stein GS. 1990. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 143:420-430.

or this one for citations from books:

Owen, T. A., J. Holthuis, V. Shalhoub, E. Markose, M. Aronow, J. B. Lian, and G. S. Stein. 1990. Evidence for a functional relationship between proliferation and initiation of osteoblast phenotype development. in Calcium Regulation and Bone Metabolism. D. V. Cohn, F. H. Glorieux, and T. J. Martin, eds. Elsvier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. pp. 371-376.

GRADING

• This report is worth 20% of your lab grade (ie 10% of course grade) — 7% of your lab grade for the first draft — 13% of your lab grade for the final version
• Total points (100 possible) will be determined as follows for EACH version: (see the separate grading sheet for a more detailed break down of points)

Possible Points

Appropriate title, names 10

Introduction 20

Materials and Methods 20

Figures and Results 20

Discussion 20

References (number, validity, format) 10

PRACTICAL STUFF

• I’m not counting pages, but am looking for you to do a nice job telling your story.
• Please double space and use 11 or 12 point font. I’m old…….
• TAKE THE TIME TO PROOFREAD!!! In this age of spell and grammar check, there’s absolutely not excuse for typos and sentences that aren’t sentences. I will dock you points for this stuff!
• If there are journal articles you find in PubMed that you would like to use as sources but our library doesn’t have access to them, please send me the PubMed ID number (PMID) and I’ll try to get you the pdf file.

Micro 311L – Staph Lab format Fall 2017 Page 4

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.