MT 460 Presentation of Analytical Tools for Strategic Decision Making
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
MT 460 Presentation of Analytical Tools for Strategic Decision Making
MT 460 Presentation of Analytical Tools for Strategic Decision Making This project will be based on the same business as the last one. Strategic Decision-Making using Analytic Tools There are two parts to this
assignment. You began this project in Unit 3. This assignment will be completed and submitted in Unit 4. Execute the prerequisites listed below to complete Part 2 of this assignment. Parts 1 and 2 of this project will
be combined in Unit 4 and submitted to the Unit 4 Dropbox for grading. Procrastination can hurt your chances of succeeding in this class. This assignment evaluates the following Course Outcome: MT460-2: Monitor
and improve business strategy using a variety of analytical methods. MT 460 Presentation of Analytical Tools for Strategic Decision Making
In this project, you will do a business case study analysis in the form of a narrated PowerPoint presentation to address one Course Outcome. The Unit 4 Assignment Template is available for download. In your
investigation of your chosen case study, you will find the following material useful: Case Analysis: A Guide. This task will necessitate extensive interpreting abilities. To prepare, read through this Case Analysis Guide.
Make a checklist out of the grading rubric. To analyze your chosen company’s external (Part 1) and internal (Part 2) environments, use the following criteria: Scenario: To research, go to the Baldrige Performance
Excellence Program website and pick an award-winning organization. As a business case, you will assess the “”Award Application Summary. MT 460 Presentation of Analytical Tools for Strategic Decision Making
“” For your chosen company, you are the director of strategy and business intelligence. For an upcoming annual report, you’re doing an evaluation of your chosen company. Your objective is to exhibit skill and
knowledge in strategic analysis of your company’s strategic position. This report will be presented to the other C-level executives for their consideration. Make strategic decisions for your award-winning organization
using the criteria listed below. Part 1 of the assignment has the following requirements: Provide background information on your chosen company, such as its name, industrial sector, goods, and target market.
Extensive research should be used. Based on Figure 3.1 (pages 49Â–50 in your textbook), introduce the concept of strategic analysis. Explain how the strategic analysis methods in Chapter 3 of your textbook can
assist your chosen organization in developing a forward-thinking strategy. Explain what the macro-environment is, how to analyze it, and why it’s important for strategy formulation. To substantiate your thoughts,
opinions, and ideas, use theories, principles, and concepts from diverse research resources (see pages 50Â–53 in your textbook). Conduct a PESTEL analysis and select three strategically relevant aspects per
PESTEL component that may have an impact on your chosen company’s long-term future, such as its strategic vision and mission, objectives, and business model (pages 50Â–53 in your textbook). MT 460
Presentation of Analytical Tools for Strategic Decision Making
Explain what strategically relevant aspects are most likely to have a larger influence and which are most likely to have a lesser impact on your chosen company’s position and business plan after looking at the
PESTEL analysis table (page 50 in your textbook). Explain how the five forces framework (pages 53 and 68Â–69 in your textbook) might be used to diagnose competitive situations in a company’s industry. To
diagnose the competitive conditions in your chosen company’s industry, conduct an analysis utilizing the five forces framework. Examine the rivalry among your chosen company’s competing sellers (see pages
53Â–56 of your textbook). Examine the competitive dynamics associated with the danger of new entrants (see your textbook’s pages 57Â–62).
Examine the elements that influence replacement product competitiveness (see pages 62Â–64 of your textbook). Examine the elements that influence suppliers’ bargaining strength (see pages 64Â–66 of your
textbook). Examine the factors that influence buyer power (see pages 66Â–68 of your textbook). Explain why the SOAR framework is important for competitor analysis as a strategic analysis tool in your chosen
company’s industry (see pages 77Â–79 of your textbook). Part 2 of the assignment has the following requirements: Explain how the techniques for examining an organization’s internal environment found in Chapter
4 of your textbook can assist your chosen organization gain a competitive advantage over competitors (page 87 in your textbook). To substantiate your thoughts, opinions, and ideas, use theories, principles, and
concepts from a variety of supplementary study sites. Explain the components of a single-business company’s strategy (see your textbook pages 88Â–89).
Determine three important financial ratios. Explain why they are strategically essential and how they might be used by your chosen organization to examine its current condition for strategic planning reasons (see
pages 89Â–91 of your textbook). Explain why a corporation should do a SWOT analysis (see pages 91Â–92 of your textbook). Make a SWOT analysis of the organization you’ve picked. Determine the company’s
strengths and weaknesses in relation to market opportunities and threats (your textbook, pages 91Â–95). Explain how a SWOT analysis’ findings can be translated into strategic actions (page 95 in your textbook).
Explain how value chain operations affect a company’s cost structure and consumer value proposition (in your textbook, pages 102Â–112). Explain how the resources and competencies of your chosen organization
offer it a competitive advantage over competitors (see pages 96Â–112 of your textbook).
Explain why your chosen company’s strategic concerns and problems require immediate managerial response (page 115 in your textbook). Analyze the findings of your strategic studies and explain how this
knowledge might help managers make key decisions regarding their next strategic steps. Oral narration and annotations should be included on each slide. Your presentations should be designed by an expert. To
demonstrate your critical thinking and provide plausible reasons for your opinions, use at least three peer-reviewed academic research materials (including your textbook). Use the third person to write and talk, and
follow the APA citation and reference structure. In Unit 4, you’ll combine Part 1 and Part 2 to submit for grading. 1st of 1 slide
MT 460 Presentation of Analytical Tools for Strategic Decision Making
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.