Neoclassical theory and economic geography

Neoclassical theory and economic geography

Description/Paper Instructions

Neoclassical theory and economic geography

Neoclassical theory and economic geography are two different but complementary approaches to understanding economic development. Neoclassical theory focuses on the factors that drive economic growth at the national level, while economic geography focuses on the spatial distribution of economic activity.

Neoclassical theory

Neoclassical theory is based on the idea that economic growth is driven by the accumulation of capital, labor, and technology. The more capital, labor, and technology a country has, the faster its economy will grow. Neoclassical theory also assumes that markets are efficient, meaning that prices reflect the true value of goods and services. This means that resources are allocated to their most productive use, which leads to economic growth.

Economic geography

Economic geography is the study of the spatial distribution of economic activity. It focuses on the factors that attract businesses and people to certain locations, and the consequences of this distribution for economic growth. Some of the factors that economic geographers study include:

• The cost of transportation
• The availability of natural resources
• The quality of infrastructure
• The presence of skilled labor
• The level of competition

Economic geographers argue that the spatial distribution of economic activity is not random. Instead, it is shaped by the factors listed above. These factors can create agglomeration economies, which are benefits that accrue to businesses and people located in close proximity to each other. For example, agglomeration economies can arise from the sharing of knowledge and labor, the presence of specialized suppliers, and the economies of scale that can be achieved from large-scale production.

The relationship between neoclassical theory and economic geography

Neoclassical theory and economic geography are complementary approaches to understanding economic development. Neoclassical theory provides a general framework for understanding the factors that drive economic growth, while economic geography provides a more detailed understanding of the spatial distribution of economic activity.

One way to think about the relationship between neoclassical theory and economic geography is to see neoclassical theory as the “engine” of economic growth, and economic geography as the “steering wheel.” The engine provides the power for economic growth, while the steering wheel determines where that growth will occur.

For example, neoclassical theory would predict that a country with a large amount of capital, labor, and technology would grow faster than a country with a smaller amount of these factors. Economic geography would then help to explain why the growth in the first country would be concentrated in certain locations, such as cities or ports.

Conclusion

Neoclassical theory and economic geography are two important approaches to understanding economic development. Neoclassical theory provides a general framework for understanding the factors that drive economic growth, while economic geography provides a more detailed understanding of the spatial distribution of economic activity. These two approaches are complementary, and together they provide a more complete understanding of how economies work.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the intersection of neoclassical theory and economic geography. This is due in part to the fact that neoclassical theory has been criticized for its failure to account for the spatial distribution of economic activity. Economic geographers argue that neoclassical theory needs to be supplemented with a more spatial perspective in order to provide a more complete understanding of economic development.

There is still much work to be done in this area, but the potential benefits of integrating neoclassical theory and economic geography are great. By combining the strengths of these two approaches, we can develop a more comprehensive understanding of how economies work and how to promote economic development.

Neoclassical theory and economic geography

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.