Neoclassical theory and economic history

Neoclassical theory and economic history

Description/Paper Instructions

Neoclassical theory and economic history

Neoclassical Theory

Neoclassical theory is a school of economic thought that emerged in the late 19th century as a reaction to the classical school of economics. Neoclassical economists rejected the classical view that the economy was self-regulating and that government intervention was unnecessary. Instead, they argued that the economy was subject to market failures, such as monopolies and externalities, and that government intervention could be used to correct these failures.

Neoclassical theory is based on the following key assumptions:

• Rationality: Economic agents are rational and make decisions that maximize their utility or profits.
• Equilibria: Markets tend towards equilibrium, where supply and demand are equal.
• Efficiency: Markets are efficient, meaning that resources are allocated in the most productive way possible.

Neoclassical theory has been used to explain a wide range of economic phenomena, including economic growth, inflation, and unemployment. It has also been used to develop policy recommendations, such as the use of taxes and subsidies to correct market failures.

Economic History

Economic history is the study of the economic past. It examines how economies have evolved over time, and it seeks to understand the factors that have influenced economic growth and development.

Neoclassical theory has been used to analyze economic history in a number of ways. For example, neoclassical economists have used economic models to study the impact of technological change on economic growth. They have also used economic history to test the validity of neoclassical theory.

One of the most important contributions of neoclassical theory to economic history has been the development of the Solow growth model. The Solow growth model is a mathematical model that explains economic growth in terms of the accumulation of capital and technological change. The model has been used to study the economic growth of different countries over time.

Another important contribution of neoclassical theory to economic history has been the development of the new institutional economics. The new institutional economics is a school of thought that argues that institutions, such as property rights and contracts, play an important role in economic development. Neoclassical economists have used the new institutional economics to study the impact of institutions on economic growth and development.

Conclusion

Neoclassical theory has been a powerful tool for understanding and analyzing economic phenomena. It has been used to explain a wide range of economic events, and it has also been used to develop policy recommendations. Neoclassical theory has also been used to study economic history, and it has helped to shed light on the factors that have influenced economic growth and development.

In addition to the above, here are some other key concepts in neoclassical theory:

• Marginal analysis: The idea that economic decisions should be made on the basis of the marginal benefits and costs of those decisions.
• Opportunity cost: The value of the next-best alternative forgone when a decision is made.
• Allocative efficiency: The state of the economy in which resources are allocated in the most efficient way possible.
• Market failure: A situation in which the market does not allocate resources efficiently.
• Government intervention: The use of government policies to correct market failures.

Neoclassical theory has been criticized for a number of reasons, including:

• Its reliance on unrealistic assumptions, such as perfect rationality and perfect information.
• Its inability to explain certain economic phenomena, such as the business cycle.
• Its lack of attention to distributional issues.

Despite these criticisms, neoclassical theory remains one of the most influential schools of economic thought. It has been used to explain a wide range of economic phenomena, and it has also been used to develop policy recommendations.

Neoclassical theory and economic history

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.