Personality Theory Psychology Homework Help Case Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Personality Theory Psychology Homework Help Case Assignment
PSY111 Personality Theory Project Rubric – 100 Points
Psychology- 2 pages
What theory is the assessment you chose to take based on? Discuss the results of your test to show an understanding of the variables being assessed and the results.
Describe two specific events in your life that exemplify how your personality may have influenced your thoughts, behavior, and/or the outcome of the event. Include in your example mention of the terms or traits included in the personality assessment you completed. For example, if you scored very low or high on a particular trait, give an example of an (You can make up an experience to use in these two parts as long as it coincides with the results and the theory) experience that exemplifies that trait. Examples need to be concise, yet show understanding of the personality trait in question.
Part 2 – Examination of Personality Development
Considering your personality profile from the above assessment, which of the following theories most accurately explains your personality development: psychodynamic, humanistic, or cognitive-social? Briefly describe the theory and justify how this theory applies to your personality development. THE THEORY I WOULD LIKE TO USE IS SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY.
Copy of the Results from MY INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT as follows:
Big Five Test Results
Extroversion |||||||||| 32% Orderliness |||||||||||| 50% Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 44% Accommodation |||||||||||||||||||| 86% Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||| 79%
The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:
Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.
Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self-controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.
Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.
Accommodation results were very high which suggests you are overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense too often of your own individual development (martyr complex).
Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.
The following is the grading Rubric:
Excellent/Exceeds Expectations Good/Meets Most Expectations Incomplete/Meets Partial Expectations Points Possible 5 4 3-1 POINTS EARNED = (5 points)
a.) What is the underlying theory supporting the personality assessment you took?
Correctly identifies the theory on which the assessment is based. Fully supports description that explains how this assessment is an example of the theory selected. Correctly identifies the theory on which the assessment is based. Needs some additional detail to explain how this assessment is an example of the theory selected. Attempts to identify the theory on which the assessment is based. May identify incorrect personality theory OR needs significant detail to support theory selected. Feedback Comments: Points Possible 20-19 18-15 14-1 POINTS EARNED = (20 points)
b.) Discuss the results of your assessment to show an understanding of the variables being assessed and the results.
Complete discussion of assessment results to show an understanding of theory and variables being assessed. Fully supports discussion. Discusses assessment results to show an understanding of theory and most of the variables being assessed. Needs minor additional detail or support to be complete. Partial discussion of assessment results. Demonstrates partial understanding of theory and variables being assessed. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. Feedback Comments: Points Possible 30-28 27-22 21-1 POINTS EARNED = (30 points)
c.) Application of assessment: Describe two events that exemplify how personality influences thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Mention terms or traits from the personality assessment.
Describes at least two events that exemplify how personality influences thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of event. Mentions the terms/traits in the personality assessment. Examples properly apply concepts from assessment/theory and show understanding of the personality trait in question. Describes two events that exemplify how personality influenced thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Mentions some of the terms or traits from the personality assessment. Examples properly apply most concepts from assessment/theory and show some understanding of the personality trait in question. Needs minor additional detail to be complete. Attempts to describe two events that exemplify how personality influenced thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Demonstrates partial application of the results throughout examples OR example(s) are not appropriate application of results. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. Feedback Comments: Points Possible 25-24 23-19 18-1 POINTS EARNED = (25 points)
Part II. Describe which theory most accurately explains personality development psychodynamic, humanistic, or cognitive-social. Justifies how this theory applies to personality development.
Demonstrates ability to describe and apply theory to explain personality variation and development across the lifespan. Justifies how the theory applies to and exemplifies personality development. Fully supports description. Demonstrates some ability to describe and justify theory to explain personality variation and development across the lifespan. Needs minor additional detail or support. Provides description of a personality theory and attempts to apply and justify how theory explains personality variation and development across the lifespan. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. Feedback Comments: Excellent/Exceeds Expectations Good/Meets Most Expectations Incomplete/Meets Partial Expectations Points Possible 10-9 8-7 6-1 POINTS EARNED = (10 points)
Writing Mechanics sentence structure, run-ons, fragments, agreement, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, etc.
Demonstrates knowledge and use of writing mechanics, enhances the readability Demonstrates knowledge and use of writing mechanics but with errors that may detract from the readability Difficulties with readability due to inappropriate use of writing mechanics Feedback Comments: Points Possible 10-9 8-7 6-1 POINTS EARNED = (10 points)
Writing Organization Coherence: all writing fits together, makes sense, and flows in effective order – beginning, middle, end
Clarity: all writing is consistent and logical
Coherence: Well organized and purposeful writing; has beginning, middle, and end; strong and appropriate transitions
Clarity: Expresses ideas clearly and logically
Coherence: Sequence of information difficult to follow; lacks a clear beginning, middle, and end; few or inappropriate transitions
Clarity: Attempts to express ideas clearly; sometimes difficult to follow
Coherence: Unclear; lacks beginning, middle and end; fails to use transitions appropriately
Clarity: Disjointed connection of ideas; difficult to follow
For each requirement not completed, points(s) will be deducted as explained below.
(Maximum Deduction 10 Points)
POINTS DEDUCTED: Requirements for basic APA document formatting and citations
(Maximum Deduction 10 Points)
Your assignment requires the following:
Name at top of document (-1 point)
1 inch margins (-1 point)
Times/Times New Roman font (-1 point)
12 point font (-1 point)
Double spaced (-1 point)
Informal citations within the worksheet (-1 point)
Informal list of references (-2 points)
– Quotation marks when directly quoting a source (-2 points)
Feedback Comments: FINAL SCORE: Additional Feedback Comments:
Personality Theory Psychology Homework Help Case Assignment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.