Personality Traits Discussion Questions Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Personality Traits Discussion Questions Assignment
I’m stuck on a Communications question and need an explanation.
After watching the video, we ask that you respond to a few questions and post them here on the discussion board.
- Do you share any personality traits with John? If so, what are these traits?
- How can John improve on his behavior in a group setting?
- As the former student assigned to help the group, what steps or theories would you use to help improve this group?
- Who do you think is at fault in this situation? Is it Mike for shutting down John’s ideas, or is it John for being lazy and giving up?
- How could we help John change these problems?
CMN 504 University of New Hampshire Categories of Interpretation Being Questions
- We cannot permit the government unlimited access to electronic communication. While national security is indeed important, the invasion of privacy and the dangers to liberty such access entails far outweigh any national security rationale.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- The Trustees are in danger of destroying the academic reputation of the University, as professors leave for better opportunities elsewhere. Take for instance Professor Westphal in Philosophy. His recent Facebook post says he’s leaving UNH primarily to break free of the destructive policies and attitudes of the Trustees.
- Argument by Example C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- All of the players who arrived at the park on time heard the report of the scouting team. It follows that none of them will be fined by the management.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- The Munchkins should be considered citizens of Oz because their village falls within the administrative district of the Emerald City.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- Well, of course the University saves some money in the short term by cutting faculty positions and courses. In the long run, however, the quality of education will suffer, and that will hurt enrollment and make the budget problems worse.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- The law defines “adequate education” as “instruction that enables students to participate in contemporary economic and civic life.” It is clear that since the school district offers neither computer education, nor an approved civics curriculum, that they do not meet the standard set by the law.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- In a recent study, the UNH Survey center, having polled 450 citizens from all around the state of New Hampshire, determined that nearly 300 of those polled were born outside of the state of New Hampshire. This surprising result means that only one third of current residents were native-born citizens of the Granite State.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- To be sold as Irish Whiskey a product must be triple distilled within either Ireland or Northern Ireland, made from grains natural to the Irish countryside, and be aged for at least 12 years. This product, although old enough, and made from natural Irish grain, is nevertheless distilled and shipped from Edinburgh Scotland. It is not, then, Irish Whiskey.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- I know a balanced budget will bring us emotional satisfaction and political credit, but from an economic point of view it makes no sense. We should not pass the balanced budget amendment.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- We should not allow unregulated development of cloning technology. While the potential medical and scientific benefits are intriguing, the moral and ethical questions involved in tampering with natural genetic evolution and reproduction are more compelling.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- The case of the murder of Officer Briggs by Michael Addison proves the need for a death penalty in this state. How many more cases like this do you need before you see the solution?
- Argument by Example C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- All of the students who came to class before Thanksgiving got the extra practice quiz. It follows that none of them will fail the test on Monday.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- Since students using the latest version of Safari are unable to download the distance-learning lectures it seems likely that there is a technological incompatibility between the Kaltura lecture program and the MAC browser.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- An eligible scholarship recipient must meet certain criteria. He or she must be ranked in the top ten percent of his or her graduating class, must score at least 700 on the verbal portion of the SAT, must have studied Latin for four years in High School, and must be accepted to the Medieval Studies program. If you look at the file you will see that Anselm was ranked third in his class, scored 760 on his SAT verbal test, has studied Latin since Junior High, and is enrolled in Medieval Studies. He meets all the criteria and is therefore eligible.
- Generalization Argument C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
- United Nations peace missions inevitably end in failure. Take as a case in point the U.N. mission in Lebanon in the 1980s.
- Argument by Example C. Argument by Division E. Transitivity Argument
- Argument from Definition D. Dissociation Argument F. Hypothesis Argument
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.