Project 1 Virtualization Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Project 1: Virtualization Assignment
Hide Assignment InformationTurnitin®
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.Instructions
For this assignment, the Caduceus CTO, Eliza, has asked you to create a working proof of concept.
Step 1: Create an AWS Educate Account
CMIT 495 requires you to complete hands-on assignments in a virtual environment. We will be using Amazon Web Services (AWS) as our virtual environment. Amazon offers a free account for those that register. The AWS Educate Video below provides step-by-step instructions with visuals on how to register for a free AWS Educate account:
Step 2: Download the Week 1 Assignment Template
Watch the video and download the template from the Virtualization Assignment Resources page.
Step 3: Install and Configure a Virtual Machine
Using the newly created AWS free account, install and configure an Ubuntu server virtual machine (VM) using the most recent version of the 64-bit operating system.
You will need to provide a detailed overview of the steps required to install the Ubuntu server operating system on the virtual machine, including screenshots of each step in the process in the Week 1 Assignment Template.
For information on installing and configuring a virtual machine:
- Search for and use AWS documentation and tutorials for instructions and guidance to complete the assignments.
- Consult the AWS Connection Documentation in order to connect to the Ubuntu server.
Step 4: Complete the Week 1 Assignment Template and Upload to the Assignment Folder
Answer the questions and embed the appropriate screenshots of your Ubuntu server installation. When providing a detailed overview of the steps required to install the Ubuntu server operating system on the virtual machine, make sure to include screenshots of each step in the process. Further details and instructions are included within the Week 1 Assignment Template.
How Will My Work Be Evaluated?
The following evaluation criteria aligned to the competencies will be used to grade your assignment:
- 1.1.3: Present ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.
- 1.4.1: Produce grammatically correct material in standard academic English that supports communication.
- 2.3.1: State conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.
- 11.1.3: Install the software.
- 11.2.1: Configure technology according to stakeholder specifications and requirements.
- 11.3.1: Add and update systems as required.
- 13.2.1: Evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements.
When complete, export your file as a PDF and upload it to the LEO Assignments folder (e.g., Project 1 – Virtualization Assignment).
Step 5: Stop and Terminate Your Amazon Instance
After you complete the Week 1 Assignment, stop and terminate your Amazon deployment/instance so that you are not charged.
Due DateJan 19, 2021 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Project 1: Virtualization Assignment
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Evaluation CriteriaExceedsMeetsApproachesDoes not MeetCriterion Score1.1.3: Present ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.8 points
Presents a logical flow of ideas that is easily identifiable and completely appropriate to the task.
6.8 points
Presents ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.
6 points
Attempts to present ideas, but the logic is not clear and/or not appropriate to the task.
0 points
Does not present ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.
/ 81.4.1: Produce grammatically correct material in standard academic English that supports the communication.8 points
Produces grammatically correct material in flawless standard academic English that fully supports the communication.
6.8 points
Produces grammatically correct material in standard academic English that supports the communication.
6 points
Attempts to produce grammatically correct material in standard academic English, but mistakes in some areas affect the credibility of the communication.
0 points
Does not produce grammatically correct material, and the mistakes hamper the communication.
/ 82.3.1: State conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.8 points
States well-conceived conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.
6.8 points
States conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.
6 points
Attempts to state conclusions or solutions, but they are not clear or precise.
0 points
Does not state conclusions or solutions.
/ 811.1.3: Install software.19 points
Installs software that is fully functional and appropriate for the given requirements.
16.15 points
Installs software that is appropriate for the given requirements.
14.25 points
Installs software that may not be fully functional and/or appropriate for the given requirements.
0 points
Does not state conclusions or solutions.
/ 1911.2.1: Configure technology according to stakeholder specifications and requirements.19 points
Configures technology accurately and thoroughly to meet stakeholder specifications and requirements.
16.15 points
Configures technology that meets stakeholder specifications and requirements.
14.25 points
Attempts to configure technology according to stakeholder specifications and requirements.
0 points
Does not configure technology that meets stakeholder specifications and requirements.
/ 1911.3.1: Add and update systems as required.19 points
Exceeds all requirements to add and update IT systems.
16.15 points
Meets all requirements to add and update IT systems.
14.25 points
Meets some but not all requirements to add and update IT systems.
0 points
Does not meet requirements to add and update IT systems.
/ 1913.2.1: Evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements.19 points
Evaluate and provides detailed justification for vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements.
16.15 points
Evaluates vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements.
14.25 points
Attempts to evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements, but some recommendations lack detail or do not consider context.
0 points
Does not evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements.
/ 19Rubric Total ScoreTotal/ 100
Overall Score
Overall Score
Exceeds90 points minimum
Meets80 points minimum
Approaches70 points minimum
Does not Meet0 points minimum
Associated Learning Objectives
1.1.3: Present ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – 1.1.3: Present ideas in a clear, logical order appropriate to the task.Required Performance: Meets
1.4.1: Produce grammatically correct material in standard academic English that supports the communication.Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – 1.4.1: Produce grammatically correct material in standard academic English that supports the communication.Required Performance: Meets
11.1.3: Install software.Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – 11.1.3: Install software.Required Performance: Meets
11.2.1: Configure technology according to stakeholder specifications and requirements.Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – 11.2.1: Configure technology according to stakeholder specifications and requirements.Required Performance: Meets
11.3.1: Add and update systems as required.Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – 11.3.1: Add and update systems as required.Required Performance: Meets
13.2.1: Evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements.Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – 13.2.1: Evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements.Required Performance: Meets
2.3.1: State conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – 2.3.1: State conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.Required Performance: Meets
Submit Assignment
Files to submit(0) file(s) to submit
After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.Add a FileRecord AudioCommentsSkip Toolbars for Comments.
More Insert actions.Format Paragraph Address Preformatted H1 – Heading 1 H2 – Heading 2 H3 – Heading 3 H4 – Heading 4 H5 – Heading 5 H6 – Heading 6
More Text actions.
More Paragraph Style actions.Font Family Arabic Transparent Arial (Recommended) Comic Sans Courier Ezra SIL Georgia SBL Hebrew Simplified Arabic Tahoma Times New Roman Traditional Arabic Trebuchet Verdana 돋움 (Dotum) 宋体 (Sim Sun) 細明體 (Ming Liu) Font Size 1 (8pt) 2 (10pt) 3 (12pt) 4 (14pt) 5 (18pt) 6 (24pt) 7 (36pt)
Show All Components
![]()
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.