PS 356 Political Science Final Exam Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
PS 356 Political Science Final Exam Essay
PS 356 – Exam
Exam Rubric Please refer to this rubric when completing your Exam. It outlines the expectations, due dates, grading, and other information that you will need to successfully complete the project.
Skills This project will help you to develop several skills:
- Writing Concisely – You are expected to explain the complex issues of representation and redistricting in no more than a few paragraphs, which will help you to write concisely for a broad audience.
- Critical Thinking – You are expected to evaluate concepts that do not always have a single “correct” answer, and you will evaluate claims made in previous research.
For this assignment you will need to refer to this rubric, readings from the course reading list, and find appropriate original resources from outside the course readings to answer the Exam questions.
This assignment is due on Friday, May 1st, at 11:59 P.M. (uploaded to Canvas or emailed if Canvas is not responsive).
This assignment is worth (300) points (or 30 %) of your course grade. In order to earn points for this assignment you must submit your final exam to Canvas by the due date.
How to Submit Your Assignment
To submit your paper: 1. Log in to Canvas (https://oregonstate.instructure.com/) and navigate to our PS
356 course site. 2. Submit your paper to the submission link called Exam.
Late submissions will not be accepted unless students are able to provide a reason and documen- tation in line with the course Makeup Policy outlined in the syllabus. In all other cases a late assignment earns a score of zero.
Select two of the essay prompts below for your exam. Your exam should result in a submission that is between 8 and 9 pages in length (Times New Roman, 12-point font, 1-inch margins, double spaced). Your submissions should have a title page and a reference page. Note these pages do not count toward the minimum page length for your submission.
Your analysis should include multiple citations and resources. Each essay should include a min- imum of three outside academic resources and a minimum of at least 8 academic resources in total. Citations should be generously weaved throughout your submission in order to support your analysis (20+).
Please select two of the prompts below to address in your exam. Each prompt should receive equal attention in your exam.
Prompt 1: What do IR scholars mean by regional integration? What different forms of inte- gration are there? Which actors are involved in regional integration? What are the motivations leading different actors to seek integration, or to prevent?
How do these actors facilitate in- tegration? How successful has the Asia-Pacific been in terms of regional integration? Provide examples and explicate the reasons by which these actors have failed, or been successful in terms of regional integration. What factors have facilitated, or hampered regional integration in the Asia-Pacific?
Prompt 2: What is ASEAN and why is it (un)important in the region? What are its origins? How has ASEAN developed and evolved over time? What are the principal features and actors of ASEAN? Which IR theory or theories best explain the successes/failures of ASEAN as an institution? Has ASEAN facilitated greater integration within the region? If so, how? Provide clear examples to support your analysis.
Prompt 3: What role has geography and history played in the interstate politics of the Asia- Pacific? How has/could the region been conceptualized? What limitations and difficulties exist in conceptualizing the Asia-Pacific as a region?
In what ways does geography facilitate or attenuate regional integration? How has history shaped the politics of the region over time and into the modern era? Provide clear examples of how historical events have and continue to affect the region’s politics.
Synthesize the readings and content from our course when you answer this question. You can draw on our course readings, but it would also be a good idea to use outside sources that can support your analysis.
Justify, Support, and Cite: Demonstrate your mastery of subject while providing numerous citations, defining terms and concepts, and supporting your argument by scaffolding citations and evidence to support your analysis. Do not assume the reader know what is going on in your head. Be explicit, detailed, and thorough in your analysis.
Outside Sources: While you may, and are expected to use, readings from our course I also expect that you will examine sources not form our course readings. These sources should be a mix of academic (peer-reviewed) sources, but may also include sources from organizations and actors that may be relevant in your exam essay.
For instance, you may use data from the WB or IMF, a web page document from an NGO, or a report from the United Nations or another IGO. Reputable news sources may also be used to frame your issue, but the vast majority of your outside sources should be from academic sources, or come directly from reports, information, and data acquired from the institutions and actors that you are using in your essay.
You should provide a minimum of 3 outside sources in your analysis.
Quality Matters: Do not get fixated on the minimum pages for this assignment. Instead, focus on putting together a quality essay and response that is well cited, grounded in the literature, provides analytical excellence through nuance and depth.
PS 356 Political Science Final Exam Essay
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.