Security policy verification for multi-domains in cloud systems
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Security policy verification for multi-domains in cloud systems
Reply to Two Discussion (150 words)
Reference when it applies.
Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 150-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:
- What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?
- What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
- What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
- What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?
1st Discussion to reply
- How do you think the enterprise content management practices of an organization without formal enterprise content management can be evaluated? According to the story above about enterprise content management (ECM) has a strategy, method and tools that can be capture, manage, store, preserve, and delivering content along with documents that are related to organization process. In addition, if a company has an IT person and he/she doesn’t have any-type of training nor education on how (ECM) operate it can make the job difficult. I can see why many companies find their selves missing out on a huge growth, especially when it comes to international companies. However, the problem is that many companies feel intense because of the governance and regulatory guidelines. So it take’s them longer to update their system or even add the ECM data due to the cost. The best practices of an organization without formal enterprise content management that can be evaluated would be “cloud-based”. Cloud-based allow users to be able to access to software application that can run off the same internet, and computer resource. This will help kept track of any information that the clients may have. It’s also a platform of many challenges, by having high-speed tech and can be accessible from anywhere. So in other words No it will not be wise to management a company without formal ECM.
2.What steps should be followed to properly evaluate an organization’s enterprise content management practices? In order to follow proper steps to evaluate. It would be best to Evaluate Cost Compare the Value, Determine the amount of Complexity, Proper levels of Security, Find Resources, and Business need and Technology. These steps will help anyone on how to help the business in the long-run. Furthermore, most companies face economic recession organizations base on how enterprise management worth. Making it a timely matter for other companies decision. Second, how well the company know or need ECM request. By using software as a service through BCM as a streamline for any business. Also help solving any issue along the way. Third, having security that will protect the company and their clients information at all times by choosing the right security software. Then you have finding the right resources for as updating systems, right software, and training others. Last you have to determine how to balance the business and technology needs. For as recognize the company needs through ECM that relies on the system by using platform perceive drive implement.
3.Select 1 of the most likely problem of an organization’s enterprise content management infrastructure, and discuss how the difficulties could be overcome. The one I selected to be most likely a problem for organizations enterprise content management infrastructure is called “Unstructured Document Formats”. “Documents come in many layouts, from simple, structured forms to free form text on a page. If you’re only processing structured forms in standardized formats, you’re getting a percentage of the benefit of automation, but not the full potential. Processing unstructured, free form document layouts requires costly manual processing, which is error and expensive” (Benjamin Antin, 2018). And also this type of format will help make keep things in order and easy to use over an over again. Instead of recreating the same format every time you need information.
GOUGLIDIS, A.; MAVRIDIS, I.; HU, V. Security policy verification for multi-domains in cloud systems. International Journal of Information Security, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 97–111, 2014. Disponível em: <http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.cecybrary.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tsh&AN=95064448&site=ehost-live&scope=site>. Acesso em: 12 out. 2019.
POWNER, D. A. Information Technology: Agencies Need to Improve the Accuracy and Reliability of Investment Information: GAO-06-250. GAO Reports, [s. l.], p. 1, 2006. Disponível em: <http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.cecybrary.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=19805316&site=ehost-live&scope=site>. Acesso em: 12 out. 2019
HerrNeckar, A. D. (2008). Enterprise management software approaches for economical selective outsourcing by managed service providers (Order No. 3304199). Available from ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304828588). Retrieved from https://proxy.cecybrary.com/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy.cecybrary.com/docview/304828588?accountid=26967
2nd Discussion to Reply
How do you think the enterprise content management practices of an organization without formal enterprise content management can be evaluated?
First of all, I found this question a bit confusing, and really hard to research. But I came to the conclusion that this question addressed the difference between management of current information of an organization and the organized and systematic collection and organization of information (aiim, n.d.), and how to evaluate this information at hand.
All information and content management practices can be evaluated, the difference is that an organization that thinks it has control over its information without formal Enterprise Content Management (ECM), may either lose lots of time by duplicating information, lose storage valuable storage space, possibly even clients and business.
What steps should be followed to properly evaluate an organization’s enterprise content management practices?
So how do you evaluate the current ECM, and what steps should be taken? Just like a formal ECM, any ECM in existence needs to be evaluated for its core components. The core components are Capture, Management, Storage, Preservation, Delivery (M.U.S.E, 2019). It is equally important to evaluate how the data, content and documents are handled, to identify each component, and if and how they work with one another. The evaluation of the system is there to identify weaknesses as well as the strengths, and what improvements can be made.
Select 1 of the most likely problem areas of an organization’s enterprise content management infrastructure, and discuss how the difficulties could be overcome.
Although there may be many areas that could be addressed in an organizations ECM infrastructure, the one I am focusing on is the document disorganization in quality management (Laureys, 2019). Document control is a vital function in a business, and if not properly managed can cause serious consequences such as loss of business, business closure, which will create loss of jobs. To avert this possibility, it is pertinent for an organization to organize all documents, develop policies and procedures to create/update them, establish proper disposal procedures of outdated and expired documents, as well as a centralized location within the ECM with access to all individuals in need of the information. In addition, it is pertinent for all parties involved to be have knowledge of all changes that are conducted, to ensure success of the program.
aiim. (n.d.). aiim. Retrieved from What Does That Mean?: https://www.aiim.org/What-is-ECM#
Laureys, T. (2019, 01 07). AMPLEXOR. Retrieved from 6 common challenges in Enterprise Content Management: https://blog.amplexor.com/6-common-challenges-in-enterprise-content-management
M.U.S.E. (2019). Retrieved from Enterprise Content Management: https://class.ctuonline.edu/_layouts/MUSEViewer/Asset.aspx?MID=16095109&aid=16095110&pIType=read_it
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.