Sense of Complacency in My Neighborhood Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Sense of Complacency in My Neighborhood Discussion
Discussion 1: Developing a Change Plan – Introducing a Sense of Urgency
As counterintuitive as it may seem, it can be dangerous for a company to be too successful. Oftentimes, along with success, an air of complacency can emerge. By focusing only on the current success, an organization may be at risk of failing to either recognize opportunities for new growth or identify potential challenges resulting from their competitors’ innovations. Likewise, in communities or even in our personal lives, there are similar risks that can lull us into a sense of complacency.
In order for the change process to begin, managers and leaders often need to create momentum—and when no visible crisis exists, it may be necessary to develop strategies to make transformational change appear to be the best option for overcoming organizational inertia.
Consider the following:
Is complacency always negative?
What is the difference between a sense of urgency and a sense of emergency?
How can leaders and managers create a sense of urgency without creating a sense of emergency Day 3
Post a cohesive response based on your analysis of the Learning Resources and your professional experience. Be sure to discuss the following:Describe an area in your own community or organization (or one with which you are familiar) where you recognize a level of complacency. After reviewing the different sources of complacency on p. 40 of the Leading Change course text, explain which source(s) may be contributing to this complacency and in what ways.
Reflect on the suggested methods for overcoming this complacency by creating a sense of urgency. Identify which of these approaches you would use to address the complacency issues you identified, and explain why you selected them.
Putting yourself in the role of the leader or manager responsible for the area in your community or organization you identified, create a specific plan for how you would implement the approach to create the sense of urgency for the change. (Be creative and ensure that you touch hearts as well as heads.)
Be sure to support your ideas by connecting them to the week’s Learning Resources as well as other credible resources you have read or to what you have observed and experienced.General Guidance: Your original post, due by Day 3, will typically be 3 or 4 paragraphs in length, as a general expectation/estimate. Refer to the Week 2 Discussion 1 Rubric for grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use the rubric to assess your work.Read a selection of your peers’ postings.By Day 5
Respond to at least two of your peers’ postings in one or more of the following ways:Compare your example with what your colleague presented and examine how the sources of complacency are similar or different and why you think that is so.
Offer additional ideas for how your colleague could address the complacency issues he or she identified and offer examples to support your suggestions.
Evaluate the plan your colleague presented and offer insights or suggestions that would further improve creating a sense of urgency.
Examine how your colleague’s input has changed your thinking about creating a sense of urgency.
Discussion 2: Developing a Change Plan – Forming a Guiding Coalition
As a sense of urgency for change is developed within an organization, there needs to be a structure in place to manage the change. In the Kotter model, this need is filled by the establishment of a change management team composed of a variety of individuals with different competencies and roles. The composition of the key players in the change process is important, and while those with solid management skills may be needed, leadership skills are vital. These key players must align together in a coalition based on trust and common goals. A successful coalition is not necessarily composed of top management, but a blend of people within an organization—a selection based on position, skills, integrity, and leadership qualities that will garner the necessary commitment of the entire organization. Key players in the change process can exist at all levels of an organization.To prepare for this Discussion:Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially:
By Day 5
Post a cohesive response based on your analysis of the Learning Resources and your professional experience. Be sure to discuss the following:If you were tasked with establishing a network for change, which types of individuals within your organization would you select? Why?
Do these individuals represent all areas in your organization that would be affected by the change?
As the change project evolves, it will be necessary to include key individuals from every level of the organization that is affected. Explain how you have included these managers and leaders in your guiding coalition.
What challenges might a manager or leader face when enlisting individuals from diverse areas within the organization?
What could be the consequences of not identifying key individuals or of not including individuals that represent all areas of the organization? What additional work would that then create in managing change?
Be sure to support your ideas by connecting them to the week’s Learning Resources as well as other credible resources you have read or to what you have observed and experienced.General Guidance: Your original post, due by Day 5, will typically be 3 or 4 paragraphs in length, as a general expectation/estimate. Refer to the Week 2 Discussion 2 Rubric for grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use the rubric to assess your work.Read a selection of your peers’ postings.By Day 7
Respond to at least two of your peers’ postings in one or more of the following ways:In developing a guiding coalition for change, how can your peers ensure that they have identified the crucial individuals to include? What criteria would you recommend they use to select individuals for their guiding coalition? Explain why those criteria are important.
Evaluate the type of individuals your peers have included in their guiding coalition. Are there additional types of individuals they should consider adding? If so, why? If not, what makes their coalition complete?
Analyze the list of challenges your peer discusses. Have they overlooked any key challenges? What do you believe will be their biggest challenge? Do you have any advice for them based on your own personal experience with managing change?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.