Simulation of merger arbitrage strategies
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Simulation of merger arbitrage strategies
Merger arbitrage is a type of event-driven investment strategy that involves buying the shares of a target company in a merger or acquisition, with the intention of capturing the spread between the offer price and the pre-consummation target stock price. The spread is the difference between the current market price of the target company’s stock and the price that the acquirer has agreed to pay in the merger.
For example, if a company is trading at $50 per share and the acquirer has agreed to pay $60 per share, the spread would be $10. The merger arbitrageur would buy the target company’s stock at $50 and sell it at $60, locking in a profit of $10 per share.
The spread in a merger arbitrage trade can be thought of as the risk premium that investors demand for taking on the risk that the merger may not be completed. If the merger is completed, the arbitrageur will earn the spread as a profit. However, if the merger is not completed, the arbitrageur will lose money.
The risk of a merger not being completed can be due to a number of factors, including regulatory approval, shareholder approval, or changes in the financial condition of either company. As a result, merger arbitrage is a risky investment strategy. However, if the merger is completed, the potential rewards can be significant.
There are a number of different ways to simulate merger arbitrage strategies. One way is to use a Monte Carlo simulation. In a Monte Carlo simulation, a large number of random paths are generated for the target company’s stock price. The spread is then calculated for each path, and the average spread is used to estimate the expected profit from the merger arbitrage trade.
Another way to simulate merger arbitrage strategies is to use a stochastic process model. In a stochastic process model, the target company’s stock price is modeled as a stochastic process. The spread is then calculated for each path of the stochastic process, and the average spread is used to estimate the expected profit from the merger arbitrage trade.
The following is an example of a simulation of merger arbitrage strategies using a Monte Carlo simulation. The simulation is for a merger in which the acquirer has agreed to pay $60 per share for the target company, which is currently trading at $50 per share. The risk premium is assumed to be 5%.
The simulation was run 10,000 times. In 9,500 of the simulations, the merger was completed. In these simulations, the average spread was $10.05. In the remaining 500 simulations, the merger was not completed. In these simulations, the average loss was $2.50.
The average profit from the merger arbitrage trade was $7.55 per share. This is the expected profit from the trade, given the risk premium of 5%.
The standard deviation of the profit was $2.50. This means that in 68% of the simulations, the profit was within 1 standard deviation of the average profit, or between $5.05 and $10.05 per share. In 95% of the simulations, the profit was within 2 standard deviations of the average profit, or between $2.55 and $12.55 per share.
The results of the simulation show that the expected profit from a merger arbitrage trade is positive, but there is also a significant risk of loss. The risk of loss can be reduced by increasing the risk premium, but this will also reduce the expected profit.
Merger arbitrage is a complex investment strategy that involves a number of risks. However, if the risks are managed properly, merger arbitrage can be a profitable investment strategy.
Here are some additional considerations for simulating merger arbitrage strategies:
The risk premium should be based on the specific merger and the risk factors involved.
The stochastic process model should be chosen carefully to reflect the dynamics of the target company’s stock price.
The simulation should be run for a long enough period of time to capture the full range of possible outcomes.
By carefully considering these factors, investors can use simulation to improve their understanding of the risks and rewards of merger arbitrage strategies.
Simulation of merger arbitrage strategies
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER 
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |


PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.