Supply-Side Economics Essay Assignment Help Case Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Supply-Side Economics Essay Assignment Help Case Assignment
DISCUSSION BOARD INSTRUCTIONS:
Each thread must contain at least 3 or 4 paragraphs including a minimum of 300 words.
- In the first paragraph, discuss the relevant economic theory of your topic (your textbook is a good source for this paragraph).
- In the second paragraph, you mustinclude outside research to corroborate your thread
- In the third paragraph, cite and discuss a real-world example of your topic.
- In the fourth paragraph, integrate biblical insightsinto your discussion board posts.
Title your thread according to your topic
(Sources such as Wikipedia, About.com, book reviews, and blogs are prohibited.)
Discussion Topic 1: PICK FROM THE TOPICS BELOW: Follow the Discussion Board Instructions in the Assignment Instructions folder and choose from the following topics. There should be no more than 3 students writing about the same topic:
- New Classical Economist (neoclassical)
- Supply-side Economics
- Tax cuts and economic growth
- Money Supply
- The role of banks
- Deposit Insurance
- Fractional Reserves
- How the Fed controls the money supply
- The importance of Federal Reserve Independence
- Money as a medium of exchange
- The U.S. Treasury
- Do we need a central bank?
Discussion Topic 2 : Topic: Follow the Discussion Board Instructions in the Assignment Instructions folder and choose from the following topics. There should be no more than 3 students writing about the same topic:
- The effect of monetary policy on the economy
- Money supply and inflation
- Rational Expectations hypothesis
- Gains from Trade
- Investment in Human Capital
- Economic Freedom
- Technology in expanding the economy
- How the legal system impacts growth
- The limits of monetary policy
- The effect of interest rates on economic growth
- Income levels
- The effect of foreign policy on economic growth
- Causes of productivity changes that increase GDP
Taking the bias out of meetings
Make sure the right people are involved
Create the right atmosphere
Ensure diversity of backgrounds, roles,
risk aversion profiles, and interests;
cultivate critics within the top team.
Invite contributions based on expertise,
not rank. Don’t hesitate to invite
expert contributors to come and present
a point of view without attending the
Make sure predecision due diligence is
based on accurate, sufficient, and
independent facts and on appropriate
Request alternatives and “out of the
box” plans—for instance, by soliciting
input from outsiders to the decision-
As the final decision maker, ask others
to speak up (starting with the most
junior person); show you can change
your mind based on their input;
strive to create a “peerlike” atmosphere.
Encourage admissions of individual
experiences and interests that create
For the portion of the meeting where a
decision is going to be made, keep
attendance to a minimum, preferably
with a team that has experience making
decisions together. This loads the
dice in favor of depersonalized debate
by eliminating executives’ fear of
exposing their subordinates to conflict
and also creates, over time, an
environment of trust among that small
group of decision makers.
Consider setting up competing fact-
gathering teams charged with
investigating opposing hypotheses.
Encourage expressions of doubt
and create a climate that recognizes
reasonable people may disagree
when discussing difficult decisions.
Encourage substantive disagreements
on the issue at hand by clearly
dissociating it from personal conflict,
using humor to defuse tension.
The biases that undermine strategic decision making often operate in
meetings. Here is a menu of ideas for running them in a way that will mitigate the
impact of those biases. Not every suggestion will be applicable to
all types of decisions or organizations, but paying attention to the principles
underlying these ideas should pay dividends for any executive trying to
run meetings that lead to sounder decisions.
Dan Lovallo and
On the cover: Seeing through biases in strategic decisions
Manage the debate
Before you get going, make sure
everyone knows the meeting’s purpose
(making a decision) and the criteria
you will be using to make that decision.
For recurring decisions (such as
R&D portfolio reviews), make it clear
to everyone that those criteria include
“forcing devices” (such as comparing
projects against one another).
Take the pulse of the room: ask
participants to write down their initial
positions, use voting devices, or ask
participants for their “balance sheets” of
pros and cons.
Use the premortem technique to
expand the debate.
Commit yourself to the decision.
Debate should stop when the decision
is made. Connect individually with
initial dissenters and make sure
implementation plans address their
concerns to the extent possible.
Monitor pre–agreed upon criteria and
milestones to correct your course or
move on to backup plans.
Counter anchoring: postpone
the introduction of numbers if possible;
“reframe” alternative courses of action
as they emerge by making explicit
“what you have to believe” to support
each of the alternatives.
Pay attention to the use of comparisons
and analogies: limit the use of inappro-
priate ones (“inadmissible evidence”) by
asking for alternatives and suggesting
or requesting additional analogies.
Force the room to consider opposing
views. For vital decisions, create an
explicit role for one or two people—the
Conduct a postmortem on the decision
once its outcome is known.
Periodically step back and review
decision processes to improve meeting
preparation and mechanics, using an
outside observer to diagnose possible
sources of bias.
Dan Lovallo is a professor at the University of Sydney, a senior research
fellow at the Institute for Business Innovation at the University of
California, Berkeley, and an adviser to McKinsey; Olivier Sibony is a director
in McKinsey’s Brussels office. Copyright © 2010 McKinsey & Company.
All rights reserved.
Supply-Side Economics Essay Assignment Help Case Assignment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.