- Expert Academic and Article Professional Writing Service
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaysolver.com
Target CEO Case Study Analysis
Target CEO Case Study Analysis
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Target CEO Case Study Analysis
Title ABC/123 Version X
1
Target CEO Case Study Analysis MGT/521 Version 15
1 University of Phoenix Material
Target CEO Case Study Analysis
Target CEO Works to Retain Consumer Trust after the Company Was Hacked
Minneapolis—Executives settled around a square table inside a Target Corp. conference room here earlier this month and munched on store-brand snacks as they chewed over something far less appetizing.
Opinion surveys commissioned by the company found that the massive cybertheft that waylaid Target late [in 2013] had knocked confidence and trust in the 51-year-old retailer to an all-time low.
Target was having trouble shaking the fallout from a key decision by Chief Executive Gregg Steinhafel that made the crisis appear even worse than it already was.
The initial evidence had indicated that credit and debit card numbers of about 40 million Target customers had been stolen. But the retailer had learned later that the hackers gained access to partial names and physical or e-mail addresses for as many as 70 million people—a breach that some top executives counseled against disclosing because it was unclear what kind of fraud danger it posed.
Nevertheless, Mr. Steinhafel insisted on making the bigger number public, sparking news reports that as many as 110 million Target customers had been affected.
At the meeting, Chief Marketing Officer Jeffrey Jones groused about the huge number. The public “keeps hearing that equals one-third of all Americans,” he said. “That’s hammering us.”
Mr. Steinhafel says he has no regrets about the aggressive disclosure and other costly decisions in the wake of the crisis. “Target won’t be defined by the breach, but how we handle the breach,” he says.
The executives acknowledge the crisis has damaged the retailer’s bull’s-eye brand, while analysts estimate it may cost Target billions of dollars. During the holiday-shopping season, Target’s sales and store traffic plummeted. Call-center volume overwhelmed employees. Executives testified before congressional panels, and the company is facing federal and state investigations into how the cybercrime occurred from its store registers and computer network.
Over the two months since the crisis erupted, Mr. Steinhafel, 59 years old, has lurched from one difficult decision to another.
At one point, he proposed in a meeting that Target would provide free credit monitoring and identity-theft insurance for one year to all its customers. Scott Kennedy, a senior executive, asked: “You’re saying we will give this to any customer who’s ever been in a store, but we aren’t checking?”
Mr. Steinhafel nodded.
“Then we’re offering this to all Americans,” Mr. Kennedy replied.
Target went ahead with that plan.
The breach could wind up costing Target, which notched $73 billion in sales in 2012, a few billion dollars, people familiar with the matter say.
New chip technology to replace magnetic strips on credit cards could cost about $100 million, one executive told Congress. Card-monitoring services for customers could cost tens of millions, according to one executive. Hundreds of millions of marketing dollars could be diverted to repairing the brand. In addition, costs are mounting for reissuing cards, staffing call centers, forensic and data-security units, and lawyers for public inquiries and private lawsuits. . . .
The CEO, who likes to say “retail is detail,” is known internally for paying surprise visits to Target stores—there are about 1,800 in the U.S. that drew about 32 million customers a week before the crisis. Store managers say they warn each other to be alert for a man snooping around the aisles, frequently snacking from a box of animal crackers.
Recently, Mr. Steinhafel says, he stopped a manager who was reading e-mail on her cellphone as she passed through Target’s downtown Minneapolis headquarters. “Please be in the present,” he recalls telling her.
From November 27, the day before Thanksgiving, through December 18, Target executives say, shoppers’ payment-card data was captured through “malware” installed in Target’s computer network. The hackers had entered the network through a vendor.
The breach got wide publicity. Shoppers clogged Target phone lines and stores. Some sent tweets and emails that they would never again shop at Target. On the last weekend before Christmas, the big crowds at Target stores had dwindled.
On December 20, Mr. Jones, the chief marketing officer, urged Mr. Steinhafel to appear in a video on Target’s website. The CEO was reluctant. He didn’t have a script and was exhausted.
With a camera rolling, Target’s public-relations chief, Dustee Jenkins, asked him questions. Mr. Steinhafel, clad in Target’s trademark red shirt and khakis store attire, thanked customers for their trust, provided tips to monitor their accounts, and promised zero liability to shoppers for any fraudulent charges.
Mr. Steinhafel began holding twice-daily “status meetings” in a 32nd floor conference room.
Early this month, prompted by the Target data breach, Congress held hearings on cyberattacks. As Mr. Mulligan, the CFO, made his appearances, Mr. Steinhafel and his executive team watched from the company’s “situation room.”
A Secret Service official testified that the data breach was “highly technical and sophisticated,” prompting Mr. Steinhafel to remark: “That shows it’s not just our operation. It would be hard for any retailer to withstand this.”
At a daily status meeting early this month, Mr. Steinhafel pushed to accelerate to early next year the timeline for Target to replace magnetic strips on its payment cards with a new chip technology widely used in Europe and Canada that is less vulnerable to fraud.
Source: Langley, M.(2014). Target CEO Works to Regain Consumer Trust after the Company was Hacked. In Kinicki, A., Williams, B.K. (Eds.), Management: A Practical Introduction (pp. 37-38). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Case Analysis Questions
Answer the following in 175 words each:
- Describe the managerial functions that were demonstrated in the case description. Provide examples of how each function you discuss was evident in the case study.
- Assess the success with which the Target management team handled the management challenges identified in Chapter 1.
- Describe the primary management viewpoint demonstrated in the case study. Evaluate your concept of its success in this case. Do you think another management viewpoint would have been more appropriate?
- Assess your ideas regarding Target’s need and ability to operate as a Learning Organization in the future.
Target CEO Case Study Analysis
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
