The Anti-Discrimination Policy AB 2542 and Discrimination Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
The Anti-Discrimination Policy AB 2542 and Discrimination Essay
The purpose of this multi-part assignment is to develop competence on a given policy in:
researching social policy legislation;
analyzing bodies of legislation related to a particular issue;
developing and articulating recommendations; and
providing written and oral testimony in a succinct manner.
INSTRUCTIONS
A Policy Brief is a concise and neutral summary of a particular issue and/or related policy. The goal is to evaluate policy options, provide recommendations, educate legislators and stakeholders and ultimately affect change.
This assignment will be worked on throughout the duration of the course and includes several, interrelated, and graded pieces. Each piece builds upon and/or is related to the preceding pieces. The pieces are:
Selection of a legislative policy with which to work (due in Week 1, non-graded)
Issue Brief – Draft (10% of assignment grade)
Issue Brief – Final (30% of assignment grade)
Written and Oral Testimony (60% of assignment grade)
The section below details the requirements of this assignment part:
Part D – Testimony
After submitting your brief, prepare a short written and oral (video) testimony. The written testimony should align with and reflect that the oral testimony is to be about three (3) minutes long. Play the role of a social worker providing testimony in front of legislative committee members who will vote on a bill.Written Testimony:
In a succinct document, include the following: Your name and where you are located (city/state)
A title
State whether you support or oppose the proposed legislation and why
Use the bill number and title of the bill (Example: HB 1234 An Act Concerning Firearms)
Summarize your recommendation, then explain your rationale
Use facts and data to support your testimony
Restate your position on the bill
Thank the legislators for their time and consideration of your position.
Provide contact information and offer to answer any questions.
There should not be any spelling or grammar issues, and the testimony should flow. Oral Testimony:
Determine why you are testifying: to persuade, dissuade, provide “expert” information, or delay action. Include the same information as your written testimony, but follow this format: Greet the members of the committee
Introduce yourself
Include all the information from your written testimony
Dress appropriately for testimony. Business dress or business casual is preferred. In real life, your testimony may be televised.
Mute or turn of your phone.
Avoid technical jargon. Many legislators are not familiar with terms and acronyms.
DO NOT threaten or antagonize or argue with the legislators.
Present your testimony effectively. Use a friendly, relaxed tone of voice. Avoid a monologue or a formal speech. Be conversational. Do not read to the committee.
Practice several times before the hearing (recording), so you are familiar with your tone, the flow, and your material.
Be very professional and stayed within the allotted time (about 3 minutes).Use the VoiceThread link below this assignment to record your oral testimony. Then copy and share the link to your VoiceThread video in this forum along with your written testimony.
Peer Feedback:
You will have the opportunity to get and provide feedback on the oral testimony from your peers. The peer feedback will serve as a sounding board on how effective the testimony was based on argument and delivery of it.After you have shared your oral and written testimony, watch the oral testimony of two of your peers.
I ONLY NEED HELP IN WRITTING THE WRITTEN TESTIMONY …EVERYTHING THAT YOU WOULD NEED TO BASE YOUR ANSWERS ON IS BELOW. THANK YOU
Discrimination policy AB-2542 (2019-2020): MOVING TOWARDS DISCRIMINATION-FREE CRIMINAL PROCEDURES. The beginning of the end
HIGHLIGHTS.
Implementation of the discrimination policy will pave way to fair trial for Hispanics and people of Colour without prejudice of any form ensuring that they will be confident in obtaining justice from the court system. This will be a great welcome .
There has been a rise in cases being unlawfully predetermined based on a convicted individual race, which has necessitated the development of this policy to try and salvage this situation. The bill makes it illegal for the government to convict someone based on their ethnicity, race, or national origin. The statute also empowers the court to investigate any infractions committed against the victim; hence, people are no longer incarcerated to file a motion to stop any ruling based on race or breach the statute’s provisions.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Discrimination based on race and ethnicity in our criminal justice system has harmed Hispanics and Latinos, as well as the entire justice system. The majority of the United States Supreme Court has stated that prejudice occurs in the administration of justice (Park, 2017). Discrimination erodes the public’s trust in the country’s justice system and makes equal justice under the law more difficult to achieve. In today’s legal system, it is acceptable for people to use racial language, images, and stereotypes in criminal cases. Since the usage of animal imagery has historically been linked to racism, the defendant is subjected to racial discrimination anytime the images are utilized in the
Courtrooms. Such misdemeanor should not be tolerated in judicial systems, so the current regulation must be changed.
People should speak openly about race and prejudice, in my opinion, as part of this effort. All legal systems should follow the constitution, which accommodates all individuals without discrimination. People must recognize the problem of discrimination and work to develop a solution that will bring about justice and fairness.
IMPORTANCE OF THE PROBLEM
Even though racial prejudice is generally recognized in our criminal justice system, most courts have dealt with it in its most apparent form. The majority of judges have acknowledged that the fight against racial discrimination in our legal system is tough. Even when it comes to criminal cases, racism is a problem there. One judge in a California court, for example, noticed that there were prejudices in the legal system, which made establishing legal rules to avoid racial discrimination difficult because of the selection of the jury, which was ineffective (Donnelly, 2018). In addition, to show purposeful discrimination in a court of justice is challenging because of the high standards set to prove any context.
In a case involving the death penalty in Georgia, the United States Supreme Court discovered a discrepancy in 1987 that demonstrated the connection between race and the death penalty (Donnelly, 2018). On the other hand, the court did not interfere because no evidence of discrimination was offered to demonstrate that our criminal justice system is riddled with inequities.
The problem’s policy implication, which demonstrates the problem’s current importance and policy relevance, is that the legislature recognizes that biases substantially impact the criminal justice system. It is also obvious that detrimental implicit discrimination is designed to hurt people of color, indicating that the policy’s aim has not been met. The policy’s intended result is that people are becoming more aware of racial bias. However, one of the policy’s unpredictable results is that it exposes long-hidden criminal justice.
Discrimination in Law Courts Critique of Policy Options
The policy fails due to various loopholes found within the law that allows for discrimination in law courts.
These loopholes include the high standards set to prove context. It paves the way for discrimination as purposeful discrimination aimed at eliminating bias against people of color is hard to explain why they are and differ from any other forms of discrimination.
The policy has failed to cover the section of selection of juries to help in cases, which leaves it open to selecting incompetent juries who make poor decisions that encourage discrimination in law courts.
For example, one judge in the court of California observed that the legal standards to prevent racial discrimination were challenging because there were biases in the jury’s selection, which was ineffective (Donnelly, 2018)
Judges have admitted to the rulings that have been influenced by the races from which these defendants come (Donelly,2018). The 1987 death penalty case in Georgia had undertones of racial bias that were not investigated because proper evidence was not brought forward.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
All the law systems should apply the constitution that accommodates Hispanics and Latinos without discrimination to eliminate loopholes that allow for discrimination of people of color. People must acknowledge the issue of discrimination and try to find a solution that will create fairness injustice. If a Hispanic or a Latino has filed a motion to disclose the defense evidence, the description of the records or information should be provided. The court shall then order the release of the documents upon which the prosecution can redact the information it needs to disclose for them to be treated fairly in the court of law.
The country cannot obtain a criminal conviction based on race or ethnicity to eliminate chances of conviction based on race (Grosso & O’Brien, 2017). Any violation shall not be witnessed. The judge should not enforce a law biased towards the defendant due to their race, ethnicity, or national origin. Also, the judge should not involve any racially discriminatory witness during the defendant’s trial based on the language. A long and severe sentence should be imposed relatively without looking at the race and ethnic group of the victim. If a motion is filed in the trial court, the court should hold a court hearing. On hearing, the evidence should be presented without limitation of the information or testimony of the witness.
REFERENCES
AB-2542 Criminal procedure: discrimination (2019-2020). Assembly Bill No. 2542. Chapter 317. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextC… Donnelly, E. A. (2018). Can legislatures redress racial discrimination in capital punishment? Evaluating Racial Justice Acts in response to McCleskey. The Journal of Criminal Law, 82(5), 388-401. Grosso, C. M., & O’Brien, B. (2017). Grounding criminal procedure. J. Gender Race & Just., 20, 53. Park, K. H. (2017). Do judges have tastes for discrimination? Evidence
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.