The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Happy Workers

The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Happy Workers

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

 

Description

This module contains the article “The Cost-Benefit of Well Employees” under the heading “Article, The Cost-Benefit of Well Employees.”

Read the article and write a paper of at least 1250 words (does not include headings or references). The following points should be addressed in the paper:

1- Your overall assessment of the article’s accuracy.
2- Go over each of the six points one by one, critiquing their veracity. Is each point distributed fairly to each employee? Why do you think that is?

3- Do you have any additional suggestions for enhancing employee health and lowering health-care expenditures for businesses?

4- Because this material is out of date, how relevant is it to contemporary workplace difficulties, and are there any current issues that should be addressed?

Your paper must be at least 1250 words long (excluding headings and references). Remember that this is worth 20% of your grade, so make sure you provide enough information to earn a good grade. Include particular examples from the article as well.

Statement of the Thesis

The most serious criticism to the thesis offered in the assignment is raised. The argument is based on extensive research and logical reasoning.

Brings forward a reasonable counter-argument to the thesis offered in the assignment. The majority of the objection is based on study and logic.

Raises a counter-argument to the assignment’s thesis. The argument is based on some study and logical reasoning.

Makes an attempt to refute the thesis offered in the assignment. The objection is based on a bare minimum of research and logic.

The thesis objection is either non-existent or missing the elements specified in the assignment guidelines.
Counter Argument

Responds to the objection with a forceful and thorough refutation. The reply successfully illustrates that the thesis can survive the criticism and utilizes the charitable and accurate principles.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The reply primarily demonstrates that the thesis can resist the objection and primarily employs charitable and accurate concepts.

Provides a succinct response to the objection. The reply demonstrates that the thesis can survive the objection and uses certain charitable and accurate principles.

Attempts to refute the argument; nevertheless, the rebuttal just shows that the thesis can resist the challenge and does not follow the ideals of charity and accuracy.

The reply is either missing or does not include the elements listed in the assignment requirements.
Conclusion

– Makes precise and concise closing remarks that sum up the article completely. The statements take into account the larger debate and/or future research that could provide more insight into the moral solution to the business dilemma.

Offers concluding observations that sum up the essay. The majority of the remarks are focused on the larger debate and/or future research that could provide greater insight into the moral solution to the commercial dilemma. The closing remarks are a little hazy.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks only take a cursory look at the larger debate and/or other research that could provide more insight into the moral solution to business difficulties. The final remarks are ambiguous and/or vague. Attempts are made to include concluding remarks that summarize the essay; nevertheless, the statements do not take into account the broader controversy and/or additional research that might provide additional insight into the moral answer to the business dilemma. The closing remarks are hazy and confusing.

The final remarks are either missing or do not include the elements listed in the assignment requirements.

Context and Purpose of Writing in Written Communication
Demonstrates a rigorous approach to material structure and presentation. The goal of the text is obvious and simple to comprehend. In the sentences and paragraphs, summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally. The paper is easy to work with. Demonstrates a reasonable level of material arrangement and presentation. The writing’s goal is, for the most part, obvious and simple to comprehend. The merging of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes causes various issues. The paper has a nice flow to it.

In written work, demonstrates a weak comprehension of content organization and presentation. Although the aim of the writing is clear, it may not be interwoven throughout the task. The merging of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes has a number of flaws. In certain places, the paper does not flow well.
Content organization and display are very constrained. The writing’s objective isn’t evident. There isn’t much mixing of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. When reading, the paper does not flow smoothly.

The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.

Control of Syntax and Mechanics in Written Communication – Demonstrates precise grasp and arrangement of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. There are no faults in the written work, and it is quite straightforward to understand. Displays syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar, comprehension and organizing. There are only a few minor faults in the written material, and it is mainly understandable.

Basic syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar, are demonstrated. There are a few flaws in the written work that may cause the reader to become distracted.

Basic understanding of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar, is lacking. The reader gets distracted by glaring errors in the written content.

The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.

Formatting Requirements for Written Communication

Throughout the paper, title page, and reference page, employs the required formatting consistently.

Throughout the paper, the proper formatting is displayed. However, there are a few small flaws in the layout.

Throughout the work, he shows a lack of understanding of needed formatting. The layout, on the other hand, does not meet all of the standards.

Fails to demonstrate a fundamental understanding of the needed formatting. There are numerous flaws, making it impossible to identify the layout from the needed style.

The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.

Word Requirement for Written Communication

The paper’s length is equal to the requisite amount of words.

The paper’s length is practically identical to the acceptable word count.

The paper’s length corresponds to at least three-quarters of the acceptable word count.

The paper’s length is at least one-half of the acceptable word count.

The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.
Resource Requirement for Written Communication

Uses more scholarly sources than is required, offering strong proof to back your beliefs. Within the body of the assignment, all of the sources listed on the reference page are used and credited correctly.

Supports concepts with the required amount of scholarly sources. Within the body of the assignment, all of the sources listed on the reference page are used and credited correctly. To support concepts, he uses fewer references than is required. It’s possible that some of the sources aren’t scholarly. The majority of the sources listed on the reference page are used in the body of the paper. It’s possible that citations aren’t formatted appropriately.

Uses a small number of sources with little or no evidence to back up ideas. It’s possible that the sources used aren’t scholarly. The majority of the sources listed on the reference page are not used in the body of the paper. Citations are incorrectly formatted. The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.

 

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.