- Expert Academic and Article Professional Writing Service
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaysolver.com
The Employee Voice Case Study Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages The Employee Voice Case Study Paper
Description/Paper Instructions
The Employee Voice Case Study Paper
Case Assignment
In this assignment you have the opportunity to look at employee voice and protections and restraints on that voice.
Prepare a PowerPoint presentation (10-12 slides, not counting the cover slide or the references slide). Your presentation should include at least two of the following: tables, charts, pictures, drawings, or other visuals. (For example, you may want to include two tables, or one table and a pie chart.)
These visuals should provide important information to significantly enhance your presentation. Be sure to explain the visuals to your audience. The presentation is being conducted on the shop floor and is being specifically directed to first-line supervisors and must stipulate what employees can and cannot openly say about their coworkers, supervisors, and employer. Cover how the term “protected concerted activities” affects workplaces.
You may choose which is more effective for your presentation provide speaker notes (at the bottom of each slide), or record your actual voice over the slides.
Include at least 4 additional sources to help strengthen your discussion.
Cooper, C. A. (2018). Encouraging civil servants to be frank and fearless: Merit recruitment and employee voice. Public Administration, 96(4), 721–735. https://doi-org.ezproxy.trident.edu/10.1111/padm.12548
Huai-Liang Liang, & Yeh, T. (2019). The effects of employee voice on workplace bullying and job satisfaction. Management Decision, 58(3), 569-582. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.trident.edu:2048/10.1108/MD-01-2019-0112
Brown, G. (April 3, 2017). What Can You Say? D.C. Circuit Speaks on Employee Confidentiality. Littler Insight. Retrieved from https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/what-can-you-say-dc-circuit-speaks-employee-confidentiality .
Clarke, N. (2010, April 14). One team, many voices: A strong, independent and informed employee voice is one of the key ingredients of employee engagement in successful organisations. The Daily Telegraph, 2. Retrieved from ProQuest Newsstand. (Document ID: 2008178971).
Du Toit, A. (2014). Engage Your Employees By Giving Them a Voice. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20141120084540-65643596-engage-your-employees-by-giving-them-a-voice .
Please upload your paper by the module due date.
Assignment Expectations
Demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the relevant issues and HRM actions, drawing on your background reading and research.
Information Literacy: Evaluate resources and select only library/Web-based resources that provide reliable, substantiated information.
Give authors credit for their work. Cite sources of borrowed information in the body of your text as footnotes or numbered end notes, or use APA style of referencing.
EMPLOYEE VOICE
Required Material
Brown, G. (April 3, 2017). What can you say? D.C. Circuit speaks on employee confidentiality. Littler Insight. Retrieved from https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/what-can-you-say-dc-circuit-speaks-employee-confidentiality .
Clarke, N. (2010, April 14). One team, many voices: A strong, independent and informed employee voice is one of the key ingredients of employee engagement in successful organisations. The Daily Telegraph, 2. Retrieved from ProQuest Newsstand. (Document ID: 2008178971).
Du Toit, A. (2014). Engage your employees by giving them a voice. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20141120084540-65643596-engage-your-employees-by-giving-them-a-voice .
Gordon, P., & Appenteng, K. (Feb. 18, 2016). Workplace recording bans and the NLRA: Are “No Recording” policies still allowed? Littler Insight. Retrieved from https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/workplace-recording-bans-and-nlra-are-no-recording-policies-still .
Guerin, L. (2017). Can potential employers check your Facebook page? NOLO. Retrieved from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/can-potential-employers-check-your-facebook-page.html
National Labor Relations Board (2017). Protected concerted activity. Retrieved from https://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/protected-concerted-activity .
Optional Material
Employment Law Information Network. (Browse for useful related articles.) Retrieved from http://www.elinfonet.com/fedarticles/7/12
Huss, S. (2016). 5 beautiful benefits of giving employees a voice. Retrieved from http://blog.arkadin.com/en/5-beautiful-benefits-of-giving-employees-a-voice/.
NUS Business School. (2017). Speaking up or staying quiet: Understanding employee voice behaviour [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA5hGKE3EZE .
Olmstead, K., Lampe, C., & Ellison, N. (2016). Social media and the workplace. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/06/22/social-media-and-the-workplace/.
Zaken, M., and Totorica (Stamford), A. (2017). Second Circuit Rules on Bounds of Protected Concerted Activity. Ogletree Deakins. Retrieved from https://ogletree.com/shared-content/content/blog/2017/may/second-circuit-rules-on-bounds-of-protected-concerted-activity
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
The Employee Voice Case Study Paper
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
