The Fiscal Crisis and Public Problems In US Case Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
The Fiscal Crisis and Public Problems In US Case Assignment
practice it can ruin the health of a city by limiting the amount of money invested for future
needs.
Fiscal Crisis
The fiscal crisis of cities has two components. During the 1970s, many cities faced
budgetary shortfalls because of rising costs coupled with decreasing revenues caused
by the decline in manufacturing and the rapid deterioration of urban economies.
These cities were forced to resort to short-term borrowing to cover their costs. Compounding
the problem was the flight of middle-class families from the cities to the
suburbs (traveling on highways built with federal money to homes subsidized by federal
housing policies), taking with them potential tax revenue that the cities des –
perately needed. The lower-income and new immigrant communities in the cities
required relatively higher levels of health care, education programs, and housing services.
When New York and other cities appealed to higher levels of government for
financial relief, they were rebuked, and this precipitated the urban fiscal crisis. Cities
responded to this situation by cutting services and systematically laying off personnel.
New York City, for example, almost went bankrupt in 1976 and was placed in
the hands of a money management panel appointed by the state to bring expenditures
back in line with revenues and limit the amount of borrowing. As a result of
the changes caused by this fiscal crisis, New York is unable to offer a full range of services
to its residents. The closing of firehouses, reductions in the numbers of police
officers and the hours of policing, the shortening of library hours, and layoffs and
firings at city agencies are some of the austerity measures enacted in response to the
urban fiscal crisis.
In the 1980s, many cities, such as Cleveland, which had defaulted in 1978, and
New York, which was forced into austerity, regained their fiscal health. The banking
community renewed its faith in the obligations incurred by municipal governments.
Short-term borrowing was controlled, and many cities prospered. For a time, it appeared
that the urban fiscal crisis was resolved (Gottdiener, 1986). However, the problem
was simply transferred to higher levels of government. At present, many states face
a fiscal crisis; New York and California have been especially hard hit. These and other
states have had to cut back on budgets for social programs in education, health, and
other areas, with perceptible effects on the quality of life. Because state governments
can no longer aid cities, local jurisdictions must increase taxes or cut back services.
Hence, the effects of the state fiscal crisis have been especially troubling for local communities,
and there is no end in sight for the first decades of the twenty-first century.
The federal government has not been able to help, since it has acquired serious
debt problems of its own for the first time in U.S. history. In 1980 the federal deficit
was approximately $40 million, an unprecedented but still manageable number. During
the 1980s, it rose to more than $150 billion a year. The interest payments on this
massive debt made up 14 percent of gross national product (GNP), and the United
240 9 : M E T R O P O L I TA N P R O B L E M S
States became the world’s leading debtor nation. Although President Clinton made
deficit reduction of the federal budget a priority, little or no effort has been made to
restore either programs or funding cuts during the 1980s. In places such as New York
and California, governments at all levels are suffering cutbacks of services and programs
as a result of the fiscal crisis. The damaging effects of these cuts cannot be exaggerated.
In Los Angeles, the police department and the district attorney’s office blame
California’s Proposition 13, which froze property tax revenues, for cuts in social programs
that resulted in increased gang activity and led to Los Angeles becoming
known as the gang capital of the United States.
Now the national debt is beyond imagining at many trillions of dollars as a consequence
of President Obama’s “fiscal stimulation” policy, which aims to jump-start the
deep recession economy of 2009 through Keynesian measures of government spending.
All lower levels of government have been promised stimulation dollars from this
astounding accumulation of fiscal debt. As the fiscal crisis of cities has worked its way
up to the state level, California, in particular, has been hit so hard that it would have
declared bankruptcy if the massive and damaging cuts in social programs had not
been affected in 2008. Yet despite these measures, it still requires either massive help
or more massive cuts. As of July 2009, the Obama administration spending proposals
have not materialized to any extent, and although they are said to be “in the pipeline,”
all lower levels of government anxiously await financial relief.
In sum, declines in local government spending on public services can be catastrophic.
States as well as municipalities have been fighting fiscal crisis, and cuts—with
their damaging results—have become inevitable. One positive aspect of the current response
to our national economic crisis by the Obama administration is the promise
that critically needed money will be channeled to state and local governments. To
date, little of this deficit spending has trickled down to the local level, but there are indications
that it eventually will. In the meantime, large states, like California, remain
stressed and must continue to cut public resources in order to avoid the unprecedented
fiscal failure of bankruptcy. In fact, during the week of August 24, 2009, the
state of California ran a massive “garage sale,” where anyone could purchase government
equipment that was surplus or merely available for the event. The goal of this
sale was quite serious, namely to make as much money as possible by selling unwanted
items to the public in order to alleviate in a small way California’s astronomical fiscal
crisis and its need for draconian cuts in public services, employment, and programs.
S U M M A R Y
It often seems that each month brings new challenges to urban areas in the United
States. Part of the problem is that our society, with its ideology of privatism (see
Chapter 13), hangs its solutions of pressing social issues, like poverty, health care, and
affordable housing, on some variation of mixed private and public interventions.
There is no universal health care in our country, as there is in other Western developed
S U M M A R Y 241
societies. Our large demand for affordable housing, once dealt with inadequately by
public subsidization, was absorbed by profit-making capitalists in the 1990s as subprime
mortgage derivative investing and yielded cataclysmic results. Although some
violent crime has been reduced in our cities, the overall level remains abnormally high
compared to countries in Western Europe and Japan, and we seem to enjoy its media
representations because crime and law shows are so popular.
In this chapter we have seen that while many social problems are not typically “urban”
anymore, our metro regions play a role specific to their spatial attributes. Cities
concentrate people, so as a form of space, they also concentrate their problems. City
crime rates are higher than in the suburbs. There are more poor people and more concentrated
pockets of poverty and racial exclusion in central cities. Consequently, when
dealing with many social issues, cities remain important as places that need special
consideration from policy makers and municipal governments need resources from
higher levels of administration.
We have also seen in this chapter that when the current economic crisis hit, our
largest metro regions were affected by unemployment much more severely than
other places because of the industries located there. Yet economic downturns, like
the present housing crisis, have deep roots in our society’s inability to solve its basic
social dilemmas. Consequently, as we shall discuss in Chapter 13, public policy can
play an important role if it tackles the major issues, some of which, like health care
and adequate land-use planning, were resolved in favor of greater public power
scores of years ago by comparable countries in Western Europe.
K E Y C O N C E P T S
social disorganization
public vs. private intervention
racism
segregation and hypersegregation
poverty
unemployment
housing crisis
affordable housing
spatial effects of social problems
fiscal crisis
242 9 : M E T R O P O L I TA N P R O B L E M S
D I S C U S S I O N Q U E S T I O N S
What is social disorganization and how can it explain urban problems?
How can you compare the early Chicago School and the sociospatial approaches
to urban problems?
Why are racism and segregation problems?
Why is hypersegregation troubling and how does it relate to the case of Hurricane
Katrina?
What is the significance of the most recent figures on crime?
Why does the space of the city create more problems than the rest of the metro
region? Should this result justify an anti-urban attitude in choosing a place to live?
Why is unemployment especially worrisome today? How does it affect metro areas?
What is the link between the need for affordable housing and the current economic
crisis? Why hasn’t American society solved its affordable housing crisis?
What is meant by a fiscal crisis? What are the implications of a city fiscal crisis?
What happens when the fiscal crisis happens at the state level?
The Fiscal Crisis and Public Problems In US Case Assignment
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.